UNLABELLED: Radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is a highly sensitive and specific marker for detecting neuroblastoma. A semiquantitative mIBG score (Curie score [CS]) was assessed for utility as a prognostic indicator for a cohort of patients with high-risk metastatic disease. METHODS: mIBG scans from 280 patients with mIBG-avid, stage 4 neuroblastoma enrolled on the Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol A3973 were evaluated at diagnosis (n = 280), after induction chemotherapy (n = 237), and after an autologous stem cell transplantation (n = 178). Individual mIBG scans were evaluated at 10 different anatomic regions, with the scoring of each site (0-3) based on the extent of disease at that anatomic region. RESULTS: There was no correlation between CS at diagnosis and subsequent treatment outcome. Patients with a CS > 2 after induction therapy had a significantly worse event-free survival (EFS) than those with scores ≤ 2 (3-y EFS: 15.4% ± 5.3% vs. 44.9% ± 3.9%, respectively; P < 0.001). A postinduction CS > 2 identified a cohort of patients at greater risk for an event, independent of other known neuroblastoma factors, including age, MYCN status, ploidy, mitosis-karyorrhexis index, and histologic grade. For MYCN-amplified tumors, the presence (CS > 0) versus absence (CS = 0) of residual mIBG avidity after induction was associated with a significantly worse outcome (3-y EFS: 11.8% ± 7.8% vs. 49.6% ± 7.7%, respectively; P = 0.003). After transplantation, patients with a CS > 0 had an EFS inferior to that of patients with a CS of 0 (3-y EFS: 28.9% ± 6.8% vs. 49.3% ± 4.9%, respectively [n = 133]; P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Curie scoring carries prognostic significance in the management of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. In particular, patients with CSs > 2 after induction have extremely poor outcomes and should be considered for alternative therapeutic strategies.
UNLABELLED: Radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is a highly sensitive and specific marker for detecting neuroblastoma. A semiquantitative mIBG score (Curie score [CS]) was assessed for utility as a prognostic indicator for a cohort of patients with high-risk metastatic disease. METHODS:mIBG scans from 280 patients with mIBG-avid, stage 4 neuroblastoma enrolled on the Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol A3973 were evaluated at diagnosis (n = 280), after induction chemotherapy (n = 237), and after an autologous stem cell transplantation (n = 178). Individual mIBG scans were evaluated at 10 different anatomic regions, with the scoring of each site (0-3) based on the extent of disease at that anatomic region. RESULTS: There was no correlation between CS at diagnosis and subsequent treatment outcome. Patients with a CS > 2 after induction therapy had a significantly worse event-free survival (EFS) than those with scores ≤ 2 (3-y EFS: 15.4% ± 5.3% vs. 44.9% ± 3.9%, respectively; P < 0.001). A postinduction CS > 2 identified a cohort of patients at greater risk for an event, independent of other known neuroblastoma factors, including age, MYCN status, ploidy, mitosis-karyorrhexis index, and histologic grade. For MYCN-amplified tumors, the presence (CS > 0) versus absence (CS = 0) of residual mIBG avidity after induction was associated with a significantly worse outcome (3-y EFS: 11.8% ± 7.8% vs. 49.6% ± 7.7%, respectively; P = 0.003). After transplantation, patients with a CS > 0 had an EFS inferior to that of patients with a CS of 0 (3-y EFS: 28.9% ± 6.8% vs. 49.3% ± 4.9%, respectively [n = 133]; P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Curie scoring carries prognostic significance in the management of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. In particular, patients with CSs > 2 after induction have extremely poor outcomes and should be considered for alternative therapeutic strategies.
Authors: Mark N Gaze; Yen-Ch'ing Chang; Glenn D Flux; Rob J Mairs; Frank H Saran; Simon T Meller Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Katherine K Matthay; Jessica C Tan; Judith G Villablanca; Gregory A Yanik; Janet Veatch; Benjamin Franc; Eilish Twomey; Biljana Horn; C Patrick Reynolds; Susan Groshen; Robert C Seeger; John M Maris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-01-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Claudiani; P Stimamiglio; L Bertolazzi; M Cabria; M Conte; G P Villavecchia; A Garaventa; E Lanino; B De Bernardi; G Scopinaro Journal: Q J Nucl Med Date: 1995-12
Authors: K K Matthay; B Shulkin; R Ladenstein; J Michon; F Giammarile; V Lewington; A D J Pearson; S L Cohn Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-04-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: G M Brodeur; J Pritchard; F Berthold; N L Carlsen; V Castel; R P Castelberry; B De Bernardi; A E Evans; M Favrot; F Hedborg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Katherine K Matthay; Gregory Yanik; Julia Messina; Alekist Quach; John Huberty; Su-Chun Cheng; Janet Veatch; Robert Goldsby; Patricia Brophy; Leslie S Kersun; Randall A Hawkins; John M Maris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan de Kraker; Kees A Hoefnagel; Arnauld C Verschuur; Berthe van Eck; Hanneke M van Santen; Huib N Caron Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Erin K Barr; Kathryn Laurie; Kristen Wroblewski; Mark A Applebaum; Susan L Cohn Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Zvi Bar-Sever; Lorenzo Biassoni; Barry Shulkin; Grace Kong; Michael S Hofman; Egesta Lopci; Irina Manea; Jacek Koziorowski; Rita Castellani; Ariane Boubaker; Bieke Lambert; Thomas Pfluger; Helen Nadel; Susan Sharp; Francesco Giammarile Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Elizabeth A Sokol; Roger Engelmann; Wenjun Kang; Navin Pinto; Adam Starkey; Hollie Lai; Helen Nadel; Barry L Shulkin; Yonglin Pu; Daniel Appelbaum; Gregory A Yanik; Susan L Cohn; Samuel G Armato; Samuel Volchenboum Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Navin Pinto; Arlene Naranjo; Emily Hibbitts; Susan G Kreissman; M Meaghan Granger; Meredith S Irwin; Rochelle Bagatell; Wendy B London; Emily G Greengard; Julie R Park; Steven G DuBois Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: K K Matthay; B Shulkin; R Ladenstein; J Michon; F Giammarile; V Lewington; A D J Pearson; S L Cohn Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-04-27 Impact factor: 7.640