Literature DB >> 18423754

Decreasing size at diagnosis of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma: analysis from the National Cancer Data Base, 1993 to 2004.

Matthew R Cooperberg1, Katherine Mallin, Jamie Ritchey, Jacqueline D Villalta, Peter R Carroll, Christopher J Kane.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The proportion of renal cell carcinoma cases diagnosed at stage I is known to be increasing significantly. We characterized stage I tumors further in terms of tumor size at diagnosis using a large national cancer registry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base captures approximately 75% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases in the United States. The database was queried for all adults who were diagnosed between 1993 and 2004 with stage I renal cell carcinoma. Trends were assessed in mean size with time as well as in the proportion of stage I tumors diagnosed at less than 2.0, less than 2.5 and less than 3.0 cm.
RESULTS: There were 104,150 patients in the National Cancer Data Base diagnosed with stage I renal cell carcinoma during the study period. A total of 10,279 stage I tumors (9.9%) were less than 2.0 cm, 26,621 (25.6%) were 2.5 cm or less and 39,879 (38.3%) were 3.0 cm or less. Analysis of stage I renal cell carcinoma diagnoses with time demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the proportion of renal masses 3.0 cm or less between 1993 and 2004 (32.5% vs 43.4%). Of tumors 3.0 cm or less the proportion smaller than 2.0 cm increased significantly during the study period from 24.1% in 1993 to 29.4% in 2004. Mean tumor size decreased from 4.1 to 3.6 cm between 1993 and 2004 (p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size at diagnosis is decreasing with time in patients with stage I renal cell carcinoma. These data likely underestimate the proportion of all enhancing renal masses diagnosed at a small size. Patients with small masses may be appropriate candidates for nephron sparing surgery, energy based ablative therapy or active surveillance. Better technologies are needed to determine the diagnosis and prognosis of small enhancing renal masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18423754     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  30 in total

1.  Active surveillance as the preferred management option for small renal masses.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Assessing the burden of complications after surgery for clinically localized kidney cancer by age and comorbidity status.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov; Katie Hrebinko; Reza Mehrazin; Anthony Corcoran; Serge Ginzburg; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  The role of minimally invasive surgery in multifocal renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Serge Ginzburg; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Imaging renal cell carcinoma with ultrasonography, CT and MRI.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge; Peter J Bostrom; George Koulouris; Antonio Finelli; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: The McMaster University experience.

Authors:  Naji J Touma; Edward D Matsumoto; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Concerns about renal mass biopsy.

Authors:  Alireza Ghadian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Understanding Treatment Disconnect and Mortality Trends in Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Tumor Registry Data.

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Brian Egleston; John M Hollingsworth; Brent K Hollenbeck; David C Miller; Todd M Morgan; Simon P Kim; Aseem Malhotra; Elizabeth Handorf; Yu-Ning Wong; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass.

Authors:  Daniel Canter; Alexander Kutikov; Brandon Manley; Brian Egleston; Jay Simhan; Marc Smaldone; Ervin Teper; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Bilateral synchronous sporadic renal masses: intermediate functional and oncological outcomes at a single institution.

Authors:  Benjamin Woodson; Raul Fernandez; Carrie Stewart; Sree Mandava; Liang Wang; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Clinical characteristics associated with treatment type for localized renal tumors: implications for practice pattern assessment.

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Gauthami Churukanti; Jay Simhan; Simon P Kim; Jose Reyes; Fang Zhu; Alexander Kutikov; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.