Literature DB >> 18423341

Effect of axial length and keratometry measurement error on intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients.

Maya Eibschitz-Tsimhoni1, Omer Tsimhoni, Steven M Archer, Monte A Del Monte.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between axial length and keratometry measurement errors and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations for pediatric eyes.
METHODS: The sensitivity of IOL power calculation to errors in axial length and keratometry measurements was computed as a function of axial length and keratometry for the SRK II, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, SRK/T, and Haigis formulas.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the IOL power calculation to an axial length measurement error is increased at 4 to 14 D/mm error in axial length in children compared with 3 to 4 D/mm error in axial length in adults. The error in calculation is 0.8 to 1.3 D/D error in keratometry measurement for both children and adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Axial length measurement errors in pediatric eyes may lead to large errors in IOL power calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18423341     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  11 in total

1.  Predictability of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in infantile eyes with unilateral congenital cataract: results from the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study.

Authors:  Deborah K Vanderveen; Rupal H Trivedi; Azhar Nizam; Michael J Lynn; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Paediatric intraocular lens implants: accuracy of lens power calculations.

Authors:  M K O'Gallagher; M A Lagan; C P Mulholland; M Parker; G McGinnity; E M McLoone
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Repeatability of Ophtha Top topography and comparison with IOL-Master and LenstarLS900 in cataract patients.

Authors:  Sha-Sha Yu; Hui Song; Xin Tang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Predictability of intraocular lens calculation and early refractive status: the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study.

Authors:  Deborah K VanderVeen; Azhar Nizam; Michael J Lynn; Erick D Bothun; Scott K McClatchey; David R Weakley; Lindreth G DuBois; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03

5.  Comparison of the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Pediatric Eyes in Children of Different Ages.

Authors:  Jiaojiao Kou; Pingjun Chang; Lei Lin; Zhangliang Li; Yana Fu; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Update of intraocular lens implantation in children.

Authors:  Mohammed Al Shamrani; Shahira Al Turkmani
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-07

7.  Refractive changes after removal of anterior IOLs in temporary piggyback IOL implantation for congenital cataracts.

Authors:  Dong Hui Lim; Sung-Ho Choi; Tae-Young Chung; Eui-Sang Chung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-27

8.  Meta-analysis of optical low-coherence reflectometry versus partial coherence interferometry biometry.

Authors:  Jinhai Huang; Colm McAlinden; Yingying Huang; Daizong Wen; Giacomo Savini; Ruixue Tu; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Refractive prediction of four different intraocular lens calculation formulas compared between new swept source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry.

Authors:  Mi Yeon Song; Sung Rae Noh; Kook Young Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Intraocular lens power calculation formula in congenital cataracts: Are we using the correct formula for pediatric eyes?

Authors:  Savleen Kaur; Jaspreet Sukhija; Jagat Ram
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.