Literature DB >> 18423318

Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy?

Caroline P Daly1, Janet E Bailey, Katherine A Klein, Mark A Helvie.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of breast cancer in women presenting for fine needle aspiration of sonographically diagnosed complicated breast cysts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. A retrospective study was performed of 186 consecutive women who presented for fine needle aspiration of 243 sonographic complicated cysts detected by clinical examination or imaging between January 2002 and August 2003. Sonographic complicated cysts were defined as those meeting most but not all criteria for simple cysts similar to current Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification. We excluded solid masses, cysts with solid components, intracystic masses, and simple cysts. Prospective mammography, ultrasound, and procedure reports were reviewed. A case was considered positive if cytology, core needle biopsy, or surgical excision was positive for cancer. Final diagnosis was established by biopsy, cytology, clinical resolution, or stability over time.
RESULTS: One of 243 (0.4%) lesions proved malignant (95% confidence interval 0-1.94%); 210/243 (86.4%) of cases yielded fluid on aspiration. Of 141 samples submitted to cytology, 138 (97.9%) were benign and 3 (2.1%) atypical. All cases of atypia were benign at surgical excision. Ninety five of 243 (39.1%) aspiration samples with typical cyst fluid were discarded. A total of 33/243 (13.6%) cases did not yield fluid, 1 of which was positive for cancer. Thirty cases underwent core needle or excisional biopsy for imaging discordance with benign results.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer presenting as a complicated cyst by ultrasound was rare (0.4%, 95% confidence interval 0-1.94%). These results provide support for classification of complicated cysts as probably benign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18423318     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Alan G Sechtin; Helga Marques; Zheng Zhang
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-08-15

3.  Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Accuracy of Cyst Versus Solid Diagnosis in the Breast Using Quantitative Transmission (QT) Ultrasound.

Authors:  Elaine Iuanow; Kathleen Smith; Nancy A Obuchowski; Jennifer Bullen; John C Klock
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Kim; Min Jung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Cystic breast lesions by conventional ultrasonography: sonographic subtype-pathologic correlation and BI-RADS Assessment.

Authors:  Man Chen; Wei Wei Zhan; Wen Ping Wang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.318

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.