Literature DB >> 18422015

On loss aversion in capuchin monkeys.

Alan Silberberg1, Peter G Roma, Mary E Huntsberry, Frederick R Warren-Boulton, Takayuki Sakagami, Angela M Ruggiero, Stephen J Suomi.   

Abstract

Chen, Lakshminarayanan, and Santos (2006) claim to show in three choice experiments that monkeys react rationally to price and wealth shocks, but, when faced with gambles, display hallmark, human-like biases that include loss aversion. We present three experiments with monkeys and humans consistent with a reinterpretation of their data that attributes their results not to loss aversion, but to differences between choice alternatives in delay of reinforcement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18422015      PMCID: PMC2251327          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Commitment, choice and self-control.

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Pointing At Smaller Food Amounts In An Analogue Of Boysen And Berntson's (1995) Procedure.

Authors:  A Silberberg; K Fujita
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  S T Boysen; G G Berntson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1995-01
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Trends in Behavior-Analytic Gambling Research and Treatment.

Authors:  Mark R Dixon; Seth W Whiting; Karl F Gunnarsson; Jacob H Daar; Kyle E Rowsey
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2015-06-05

2.  Conceptual preferences can be transmitted via selective social information use between competing wild bird species.

Authors:  Jukka T Forsman; Sami M Kivelä; Jere Tolvanen; Olli J Loukola
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.653

Review 3.  Token reinforcement: a review and analysis.

Authors:  Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Social comparison mediates chimpanzees' responses to loss, not frustration.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Experience-based decisions and brain activity: three new gaps and partial answers.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Itzhak Aharon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-01-05

6.  To Take Risk is to Face Loss: A Tonic Pupillometry Study.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Ariel Telpaz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-22

7.  Problematic Internet Users Show Impaired Inhibitory Control and Risk Taking with Losses: Evidence from Stop Signal and Mixed Gambles Tasks.

Authors:  Qi Li; Weizhi Nan; Jamie Taxer; Weine Dai; Ya Zheng; Xun Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.