Literature DB >> 18421496

Species differences in the sensitivity of avian embryos to methylmercury.

Gary H Heinz1, David J Hoffman, Jon D Klimstra, Katherine R Stebbins, Shannon L Kondrad, Carol A Erwin.   

Abstract

We injected doses of methylmercury into the air cells of eggs of 26 species of birds and examined the dose-response curves of embryo survival. For 23 species we had adequate data to calculate the median lethal concentration (LC(50)). Based on the dose-response curves and LC(50)s, we ranked species according to their sensitivity to injected methylmercury. Although the previously published embryotoxic threshold of mercury in game farm mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) has been used as a default value to protect wild species of birds, we found that, relative to other species, mallard embryos are not very sensitive to injected methylmercury; their LC(50 )was 1.79 microg/g mercury on a wet-weight basis. Other species we categorized as also exhibiting relatively low sensitivity to injected methylmercury (their LC(50)s were 1 microg/g mercury or higher) were the hooded merganser (Lophodytes cucullatus), lesser scaup (Aythya affinis), Canada goose (Branta canadensis), double-crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus), and laughing gull (Larus atricilla). Species we categorized as having medium sensitivity (their LC(50)s were greater than 0.25 microg/g mercury but less than 1 microg/g mercury) were the clapper rail (Rallus longirostris), sandhill crane (Grus canadensis), ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), chicken (Gallus gallus), common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor), herring gull (Larus argentatus), common tern (Sterna hirundo), royal tern (Sterna maxima), Caspian tern (Sterna caspia), great egret (Ardea alba), brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), and anhinga (Anhinga anhinga). Species we categorized as exhibiting high sensitivity (their LC(50)s were less than 0.25 microg/g mercury) were the American kestrel (Falco sparverius), osprey (Pandion haliaetus), white ibis (Eudocimus albus), snowy egret (Egretta thula), and tri-colored heron (Egretta tricolor). For mallards, chickens, and ring-necked pheasants (all species for which we could compare the toxicity of our injected methylmercury with that of published reports where methylmercury was fed to breeding adults and was deposited into the egg by the mother), we found the injected mercury to be more toxic than the same amount of mercury deposited naturally by the mother. The rank order of sensitivity of these same three species to methylmercury was, however, the same whether the methylmercury was injected or maternally deposited in the egg (i.e., the ring-necked pheasant was more sensitive than the chicken, which was more sensitive than the mallard). It is important to note that the dose-response curves and LC(50)s derived from our egg injections are useful for ranking the sensitivities of various species but are not identical to the LC(50)s that would be observed if the mother bird had put the same concentrations of mercury into her eggs; the LC(50)s of maternally deposited methylmercury would be higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18421496     DOI: 10.1007/s00244-008-9160-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  42 in total

1.  Altered pairing behaviour and reproductive success in white ibises exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of methylmercury.

Authors:  Peter Frederick; Nilmini Jayasena
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Ecologically-relevant exposure to methylmercury during early development does not affect adult phenotype in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  Spencer A M Morran; John E Elliott; Jessica M L Young; Margaret L Eng; Niladri Basu; Tony D Williams
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Mercury in the eggs of aquatic birds from the Gulf of Gdansk and Wloclawek Dam (Poland).

Authors:  Agnieszka Grajewska; Lucyna Falkowska; Emilia Szumiło-Pilarska; Julia Hajdrych; Marta Szubska; Tomasz Frączek; Włodzimierz Meissner; Szymon Bzoma; Magdalena Bełdowska; Andrzej Przystalski; Tomasz Brauze
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Mercury levels in birds and small rodents from Las Orquideas National Natural Park, Colombia.

Authors:  Lucellys Sierra-Marquez; Sandra Peñuela-Gomez; Laura Franco-Espinosa; Daisy Gomez-Ruiz; Juan Diaz-Nieto; Juan Sierra-Marquez; Jesus Olivero-Verbel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Mercury exposure of a wetland songbird, Agelaius phoeniceus, in the New York metropolitan area and its effect on nestling growth rate.

Authors:  Allisyn-Marie Tsz Yan Gillet; Chad L Seewagen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Integrated mercury monitoring program for temperate estuarine and marine ecosystems on the North American Atlantic coast.

Authors:  David C Evers; Robert P Mason; Neil C Kamman; Celia Y Chen; Andrea L Bogomolni; David L Taylor; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Stephen H Jones; Neil M Burgess; Kenneth Munney; Katharine C Parsons
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.184

7.  Survival of postfledging Forster's terns in relation to mercury exposure in San Francisco Bay.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; Collin A Eagles-Smith; John Y Takekawa; Samuel A Iverson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Integrating mercury science and policy in the marine context: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Kathleen F Lambert; David C Evers; Kimberly A Warner; Susannah L King; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Effects of methylmercury on epigenetic markers in three model species: mink, chicken and yellow perch.

Authors:  Niladri Basu; Jessica Head; Dong-Ha Nam; J Richard Pilsner; Michael J Carvan; Hing Man Chan; Frederick W Goetz; Cheryl A Murphy; Kirsti Rouvinen-Watt; Anton M Scheuhammer
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.228

10.  Marine foraging birds as bioindicators of mercury in the Gulf of Maine.

Authors:  M Wing Goodale; David C Evers; Steven E Mierzykowski; Alexander L Bond; Neil M Burgess; Catherine I Otorowski; Linda J Welch; C Scott Hall; Julie C Ellis; R Bradford Allen; Anthony W Diamond; Stephen W Kress; Robert J Taylor
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.