Literature DB >> 18421111

A comparative study of energy minimization methods for Markov random fields with smoothness-based priors.

Richard Szeliski1, Ramin Zabih, Daniel Scharstein, Olga Veksler, Vladimir Kolmogorov, Aseem Agarwala, Marshall Tappen, Carsten Rother.   

Abstract

Among the most exciting advances in early vision has been the development of efficient energy minimization algorithms for pixel-labeling tasks such as depth or texture computation. It has been known for decades that such problems can be elegantly expressed as Markov random fields, yet the resulting energy minimization problems have been widely viewed as intractable. Recently, algorithms such as graph cuts and loopy belief propagation (LBP) have proven to be very powerful: for example, such methods form the basis for almost all the top-performing stereo methods. However, the tradeoffs among different energy minimization algorithms are still not well understood. In this paper we describe a set of energy minimization benchmarks and use them to compare the solution quality and running time of several common energy minimization algorithms. We investigate three promising recent methods graph cuts, LBP, and tree-reweighted message passing in addition to the well-known older iterated conditional modes (ICM) algorithm. Our benchmark problems are drawn from published energy functions used for stereo, image stitching, interactive segmentation, and denoising. We also provide a general-purpose software interface that allows vision researchers to easily switch between optimization methods. Benchmarks, code, images, and results are available at http://vision.middlebury.edu/MRF/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18421111     DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.70844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell        ISSN: 0098-5589            Impact factor:   6.226


  24 in total

1.  Deep monocular 3D reconstruction for assisted navigation in bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Marco Visentini-Scarzanella; Takamasa Sugiura; Toshimitsu Kaneko; Shinichiro Koto
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  NONRIGID VOLUME REGISTRATION USING SECOND-ORDER MRF MODEL.

Authors:  Dongjin Kwon; Il Dong Yun; Kilian M Pohl; Christos Davatzikos; Sang Uk Lee
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2012-07-12

3.  Reliable estimation of incoherent motion parametric maps from diffusion-weighted MRI using fusion bootstrap moves.

Authors:  Moti Freiman; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Michael J Callahan; Stephan D Voss; Kirsten Ecklund; Robert V Mulkern; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Brain MRI tissue classification based on local Markov random fields.

Authors:  Jussi Tohka; Ivo D Dinov; David W Shattuck; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Robust multiscale stereo matching from fundus images with radiometric differences.

Authors:  Li Tang; Mona K Garvin; Kyungmoo Lee; Wallace L M Alward; Young H Kwon; Michael D Abràmoff
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  A fast iterated conditional modes algorithm for water-fat decomposition in MRI.

Authors:  Fangping Huang; Sreenath Narayan; David Wilson; David Johnson; Guo-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Fast lipid and water levels by extraction with spatial smoothing (FLAWLESS): three-dimensional volume fat/water separation at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Sreenath Narayan; Fangping Huang; David Johnson; Madhusudhana Gargesha; Chris A Flask; Guo-Qiang Zhang; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  High-throughput detection of prostate cancer in histological sections using probabilistic pairwise Markov models.

Authors:  James P Monaco; John E Tomaszewski; Michael D Feldman; Ian Hagemann; Mehdi Moradi; Parvin Mousavi; Alexander Boag; Chris Davidson; Purang Abolmaesumi; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Class-specific weighting for Markov random field estimation: application to medical image segmentation.

Authors:  James P Monaco; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  ACTIVE MEAN FIELDS FOR PROBABILISTIC IMAGE SEGMENTATION: CONNECTIONS WITH CHAN-VESE AND RUDIN-OSHER-FATEMI MODELS.

Authors:  Marc Niethammer; Kilian M Pohl; Firdaus Janoos; William M Wells
Journal:  SIAM J Imaging Sci       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.