Literature DB >> 18420335

Comparison of freehand 3-D ultrasound calibration techniques using a stylus.

Po-Wei Hsu1, Graham M Treece, Richard W Prager, Neil E Houghton, Andrew H Gee.   

Abstract

In a freehand 3-D ultrasound system, a probe calibration is required to find the rigid body transformation from the corner of the B-scan to the electrical center of the position sensor. The most intuitive way to perform such a calibration is by locating fiducial points in the scan plane directly with a stylus. The main problem of this approach is the difficulty in aligning the tip of the stylus with the scan plane. The thick beamwidth makes the tip of the stylus visible in the B-scan, even if the tip is not exactly at the elevational center of the scan plane. We present a novel stylus and phantom that simplify the alignment process for more accurate probe calibration. We also compare our calibration techniques with a range of styli. We show that our stylus and cone phantom are both simple in design and can achieve a point reconstruction accuracy of 2.2 mm and 1.8 mm, respectively, an improvement from 3.2 mm and 3.6 mm with the sharp and spherical stylus. The performance of our cone stylus and phantom lie between the state-of-the-art Z-phantom and Cambridge phantom, where accuracies of 2.5 mm and 1.7 mm are achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18420335     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  9 in total

1.  Adaptive spatial calibration of a 3D ultrasound system.

Authors:  Alex Hartov; Keith Paulsen; Songbai Ji; Kathryn Fontaine; Marie-Laure Furon; Andrea Borsic; David Roberts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Robot-assisted automatic ultrasound calibration.

Authors:  Fereshteh Aalamifar; Alexis Cheng; Younsu Kim; Xiao Hu; Haichong K Zhang; Xiaoyu Guo; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Phantom with multiple active points for ultrasound calibration.

Authors:  Haichong K Zhang; Alexis Cheng; Younsu Kim; Qianli Ma; Gregory S Chirikjian; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-27

4.  Fusion of coronary angiography and stress echocardiography for myocardial viability evaluation.

Authors:  S Bisplinghoff; C Hänisch; M Becker; K Radermacher; M de la Fuente
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Guided ultrasound calibration: where, how, and how many calibration fiducials.

Authors:  Elvis C S Chen; Terry M Peters; Burton Ma
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  User-friendly freehand ultrasound calibration using Lego bricks and automatic registration.

Authors:  Yiming Xiao; Charles Xiao Bo Yan; Simon Drouin; Dante De Nigris; Anna Kochanowska; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Model-based correction of tissue compression for tracked ultrasound in soft tissue image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Thomas S Pheiffer; Reid C Thompson; Daniel C Rucker; Amber L Simpson; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Spatial calibration of a 2D/3D ultrasound using a tracked needle.

Authors:  Francisco Vasconcelos; Donald Peebles; Sebastien Ourselin; Danail Stoyanov
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Hybrid electromagnetic-ArUco tracking of laparoscopic ultrasound transducer in laparoscopic video.

Authors:  Xinyang Liu; William Plishker; Raj Shekhar
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-02-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.