Literature DB >> 18420176

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair under spinal anesthesia: a feasibility study.

George Tzovaras1, Dimitris Zacharoulis, Stavroula Georgopoulou, Konstantinos Pratsas, Georgia Stamatiou, Constantine Hatzitheofilou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia has not been used as the sole anesthetic procedure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair due to the fear of potential adverse effects of the pneumoperitoneum. However, there are recent reports on the feasibility of performing laparoscopic procedures, such as cholecystectomy, in fit patients, under spinal anesthesia alone. The current study aimed to detect the feasibility of performing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair under spinal anesthesia.
METHODS: Twenty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II patients underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum under spinal anesthesia. In 9 cases the hernia was umbilical/para-umbilical, in 5 cases epigastric, and in 11 cases incisional. Intraoperative incidents, complications, postoperative pain, and recovery in general, as well as patient satisfaction at follow-up examination, were prospectively recorded.
RESULTS: All operations were completed laparoscopically and conversion from spinal to general anesthesia was not required in any of the cases. Median pain score at 4 hours postoperatively was .5 (range 0-5), at 8 hours 1.5 (range 0-6), and at 24 hours 1.5 (range 0-4). Most patients were discharged 24 hours after the operation; the median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1-3 days). At 2-weeks follow-up, no late complications were detected and all patients reported being satisfied with the anesthetic procedure.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum can be successfully and safely performed under spinal anesthesia. Furthermore, it seems that spinal anesthesia is associated with minimal postoperative pain and smooth recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18420176     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current options in umbilical hernia repair in adult patients.

Authors:  Hakan Kulaçoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-09-01

2.  ["Does minimally invasive surgery really imply minimally invasive anaesthesia?"].

Authors:  T Koch; R J Litz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Regional anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  George Vretzakis; Metaxia Bareka; Diamanto Aretha; Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Hemodynamic effects of anesthesia type in patients undergoing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair under spinal vs general anesthesia.

Authors:  C Sarakatsianou; S Georgopoulou; G Tzovaras; K Perivoliotis; M-E Papadonta; I Baloyiannis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair under regional anesthesia: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ioannis Baloyiannis; Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Chamaidi Sarakatsianou; George Tzovaras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Spinal versus general anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopy: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Berna Kaya Uğur; Lütfiye Pirbudak; Ebru Öztürk; Özcan Balat; Mete Gürol Uğur
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-10-02

7.  Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy with epidural vs. general anesthesia.

Authors:  Sharona B Ross; Devanand Mangar; Rachel Karlnoski; Enrico Camporesi; Katheryne Downes; Kenneth Luberice; Krista Haines; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.