Literature DB >> 18420166

Women tolerate drug therapy for coronary artery disease as well as men do, but are treated less frequently with aspirin, beta-blockers, or statins.

Jonathan R Enriquez1, Pravin Pratap, Joseph P Zbilut, James E Calvin, Annabelle S Volgman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women have worse morbidity, mortality, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with men. This may be related to underutilization of drug therapies, such as aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or statins. No studies have sought to describe the relationship of gender with adverse reactions to drug therapy (ADRs) for CAD in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of ADRs associated with common CAD drug therapies in women and men in clinical practice.
METHODS: In a cohort of consecutive outpatients with CAD, detailed chart abstraction was performed to determine the use of aspirin, beta-blocker, ACE inhibitor, and statin therapy, as well as the ADRs reported for these treatments. Baseline clinical characteristics were also determined to identify the independent association of gender with use of standard drug treatments for CAD.
RESULTS: Consecutive patients with CAD (153 men, 151 women) were included in the study. Women and men were observed to have a similar prevalence of cardiac risk factors and comorbidities, except that men had significantly higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (30 [19.6%] men vs 15 [9.9%] women; P = 0.03) and significantly lower mean (SD) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (45 [16] mg/dL for men vs 55 [19] mg/dL for women; P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the sexes in the prevalence of ADRs; however, significantly fewer women than men were treated with statins (118 [78.1%] vs 139 [90.8%], respectively; P = 0.003). After adjusting for clinical characteristics, women were also found to be less likely than men to receive aspirin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.164; 95% CI, 0.083-0.322; P = 0.001) and beta-blockers (OR = 0.184; 95% CI, 0.096-0.351; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Women and men experienced a similar prevalence of ADRs in the treatment of CAD; however, women were significantly less likely to be treated with aspirin, beta-blockers, and statins than were their male counterparts. To optimize care for women with CAD, further study is needed to identify the cause of this gender disparity in therapeutic drug use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18420166     DOI: 10.1016/s1550-8579(08)80008-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gend Med        ISSN: 1550-8579


  13 in total

1.  Peripheral arterial disease in women: the effect of gender on diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Eduardo A Hernandez-Vila
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Preventing and Experiencing Ischemic Heart Disease as a Woman: State of the Science: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jean C McSweeney; Anne G Rosenfeld; Willie M Abel; Lynne T Braun; Lora E Burke; Stacie L Daugherty; Gerald F Fletcher; Martha Gulati; Laxmi S Mehta; Christina Pettey; Jane F Reckelhoff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Understanding gender differences in statin use among elderly Medicare beneficiaries: an application of decomposition technique.

Authors:  Sandipan Bhattacharjee; Patricia A Findley; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Racial disparities in awareness and treatment of atrial fibrillation: the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

Authors:  James F Meschia; Peter Merrill; Elsayed Z Soliman; Virginia J Howard; Kevin M Barrett; Neil A Zakai; Dawn Kleindorfer; Monika Safford; George Howard
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Geographic variation in HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor use in dialysis patients.

Authors:  James B Wetmore; Jonathan D Mahnken; Purna Mukhopadhyay; Qingjiang Hou; Edward F Ellerbeck; Sally K Rigler; John A Spertus; Theresa I Shireman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Assessment of Sex Differences for Treatment, Procedures, Complications, and Associated Conditions Among Adolescents Hospitalized with Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Jennifer L Dotson; Josh B Bricker; Michael D Kappelman; Deena Chisolm; Wallace V Crandall
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 7.  Pharmacogenomics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: interaction with biological differences between men and women.

Authors:  Flavia Franconi; Ilaria Campesi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  Sex-based differences in cardiac ischaemic injury and protection: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  B Ostadal; P Ostadal
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Discharge Prescription Patterns for Antiplatelet Therapy Following Lower Extremity Peripheral Vascular Intervention.

Authors:  Nikhil Singh; Li Ding; Gregory A Magee; David M Shavelle; Vikram S Kashyap; Parveen K Garg
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 6.546

10.  Risk of peripheral artery disease according to race and sex: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  Caitlin W Hicks; Ning Ding; Lucia Kwak; Shoshana H Ballew; Corey A Kalbaugh; Aaron R Folsom; Gerardo Heiss; Josef Coresh; James H Black; Elizabeth Selvin; Kunihiro Matsushita
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.