| Literature DB >> 18419819 |
Nicole J Crane1, Peter A Pinto, Douglas Hale, Frederick A Gage, Doug Tadaki, Allan D Kirk, Ira W Levin, Eric A Elster.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Standard methods for assessment of organ viability during surgery are typically limited to visual cues and tactile feedback in open surgery. However, during laparoscopic surgery, these processes are impaired. This is of particular relevance during laparoscopic renal donation, where the condition of the kidney must be optimized despite considerable manipulation. However, there is no in vivo methodology to monitor renal parenchymal oxygenation during laparoscopic surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18419819 PMCID: PMC2394515 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-8-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Surg ISSN: 1471-2482 Impact factor: 2.102
Figure 1Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. (a) Image of kidney extracted from DVD as a .tiff file. (b) Red CCD response, plotted in grayscale. (c) Blue CCD response, plotted in grayscale. (d) Red CCD response minus blue CCD response, set to special color scale. (e) Calculated CCD response image overlaid onto the original image at 55% transparency.
Figure 2Renal parenchymal oxygen tension (pO The FiO2 is indicated with dashed arrows. The times of blood draws, where blood gas measurements were made (sO2), are indicated by BD.
Patient Demographics
| 1 | 48 | 26.01 | female | 300 | 700 | 8600 | 1400 |
| 2 | 49 | female | 240 | 400 | 6200 | 3000 | |
| 3 | 27 | 23.20 | female | 220 | 100 | 6000 | 1400 |
| 4 | 53 | 26.23 | male | 300 | 300 | 6600 | 1900 |
| 5 | 39 | 26.79 | male | 240 | 400 | 8500 | 2400 |
| 6 | 26 | 23.30 | male | 340 | < 50 | 4400 | 1100 |
| 7 | 42 | 37.08 | female | 280 | 150 | 3700 | 900 |
| 8 | 28 | 22.74 | female | 355 | 200 | 5800 | 1400 |
| 9 | 22 | 20.69 | male | 385 | 100 | 5800 | 1665 |
BMI – body mass index; OR – operating room; EBL – estimated blood loss
* Fluid was lactated ringers in all cases.
Figure 3Linear relationship of calculated mean normalized ROI (region of interest) values and measured venous sO R2 = 0.9722 (○), 0.9854 (□), 0.9624 (△) and 0.9801 (◇).
Figure 4The normalized mean ROI values for nine donor laparoscopic nephrectomies: (a-i) case 1–9, respectively.
Mean intensity normalized ROI values. Mean intensity normalized ROI values of both the start and end time points for each case. All p-values are above 0.05 and indicate the mean ROI values for the start and end time points are not significantly different.
| Case | Mean ROI | σ* | Mean ROI | σ* | |
| 1 | 48.40 | 5.60 | 44.48 | 3.55 | |
| 2 | 54.88 | 14.56 | 65.02 | 11.31 | |
| 3 | 72.42 | 5.51 | 61.17 | 13.38 | |
| 4 | 84.27 | 3.38 | 75.58 | 7.15 | |
| 5 | 79.78 | 6.62 | 68.64 | 7.83 | |
| 6 | 81.17 | 7.24 | 75.98 | 0.97 | |
| 7 | 75.50 | 3.37 | 78.96 | 10.62 | |
| 8 | 62.41 | 10.58 | 60.29 | 6.90 | |
| 9 | 73.09 | 2.49 | 67.74 | 0.19 | |
* σ = one standard deviation
Donor and recipient serum creatinine levels (pre- and post-operative). Normal serum creatinine levels are ≤ 1.6 mg/dl.
| Pre-op day 1 | Post-op day 1 | Pre-op day 5 | Post-op day 10 | |
| 1 | 0.8 | 5.1 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| 2 | 0.7 | 5.1 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| 3 | 0.7 | 7.9 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 4 | 0.7 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 5 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| 6 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| 7 | 0.8 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 8 | 0.7 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 1.7 |
| 9 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 2.0 |
Recipient blood urea nitrogen values at post-operative days 1, 5 and 20. Normal BUN is 8–20 mg/dl.
| 1 | 30 | 27 | 15 |
| 2 | 34 | 23 | 16 |
| 3 | 53 | 35 | 20 |
| 4 | 27 | 17 | 15 |
| 5 | 58 | 21 | 12 |
| 6 | 22 | 14 | 19 |
| 7 | 35 | 20 | 15 |
| 8 | 22 | 38 | 15 |
| 9 | 45 | 27 | 28 |