Literature DB >> 18418344

Interim within-season estimate of the effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine--Marshfield, Wisconsin, 2007-08 influenza season.

.   

Abstract

During clinical trials, the efficacy of vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccines for the prevention of serologically confirmed influenza infection has been estimated as high as 70%-90% among healthier adults. However, the effectiveness of annual influenza vaccination typically is lower during those influenza seasons when a suboptimal match between the vaccine strains and circulating influenza strains is observed. For example, in a 4-year randomized study of influenza vaccine among healthy persons aged 1-65 years, the predominant strain was drifted from the vaccine strain in 2 of the 4 years. Inactivated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against culture-confirmed influenza ranged from 71% to 79% when the vaccine and circulating strains were suboptimally matched to 74% to 79% when the matches were well matched. In contrast, a 2-year study of inactivated influenza vaccine among healthy adults aged 18-64 years found no measurable VE during a year when a poorly matched strain circulated, but found VE of 86% against laboratory-confirmed influenza during the following year when the vaccine and circulating strains were well matched. Although laboratory data on the antigenic characteristics of circulating influenza viruses compared with vaccine strains are available during influenza seasons, estimates of VE usually have not been made until months after the conclusion of the season. This report summarizes interim results of a 2008 case-control study to estimate the effectiveness of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine for prevention of medically attended, laboratory-confirmed influenza during the 2007-08 influenza season, when most circulating influenza A (H3N2) and B viruses were suboptimally matched to the vaccine strains. Despite the suboptimal match between two of three vaccine strains and circulating influenza strains, overall VE in the study population during January 21-February 8, 2008, was 44%. These findings demonstrate that, in any season, assessment of the clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccines cannot be determined solely by laboratory evaluation of the degree of antigenic match between vaccine and circulation strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18418344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  29 in total

1.  Suppression of influenza A virus replication in human lung epithelial cells by noncytotoxic concentrations bafilomycin A1.

Authors:  Behzad Yeganeh; Saeid Ghavami; Andrea L Kroeker; Thomas H Mahood; Gerald L Stelmack; Thomas Klonisch; Kevin M Coombs; Andrew J Halayko
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  Establishment and characterization of a Madin-Darby canine kidney reporter cell line for influenza A virus assays.

Authors:  M Jaber Hossain; Sandra Perez; Zhu Guo; Li-Mei Chen; Ruben O Donis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  An update on childhood and adolescent vaccines.

Authors:  Robert M Jacobson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Immunologic non-inferiority of a newly licensed inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine versus an established vaccine: a randomized study in US adults.

Authors:  James D Campbell; Christopher V Chambers; Rebecca C Brady; Michael C Caldwell; Nathan L Bennett; Marc A Fourneau; Varsha K Jain; Bruce L Innis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2011-01-01

5.  Cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent influenza vaccine in Hong Kong - A decision analysis.

Authors:  Joyce H S You; Wai-Kit Ming; Paul K S Chan
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Validation of Health Event Capture in the Marshfield Epidemiologic Study Area.

Authors:  Amy L Kieke; Burney A Kieke; Sarah L Kopitzke; David L McClure; Edward A Belongia; Jeffrey J VanWormer; Robert T Greenlee
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-12-08

7.  Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States during a season with circulation of all three vaccine strains.

Authors:  John J Treanor; H Keipp Talbot; Suzanne E Ohmit; Laura A Coleman; Mark G Thompson; Po-Yung Cheng; Joshua G Petrie; Geraldine Lofthus; Jennifer K Meece; John V Williams; Lashondra Berman; Caroline Breese Hall; Arnold S Monto; Marie R Griffin; Edward Belongia; David K Shay
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Evaluation of targeted influenza vaccination strategies via population modeling.

Authors:  John Glasser; Denis Taneri; Zhilan Feng; Jen-Hsiang Chuang; Peet Tüll; William Thompson; Mary Mason McCauley; James Alexander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Case-based surveillance of influenza hospitalizations during 2004-2008, Colorado, USA.

Authors:  Rosemary Proff; Ken Gershman; Dennis Lezotte; Ann-Christine Nyquist
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  New class of monoclonal antibodies against severe influenza: prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy in ferrets.

Authors:  Robert H E Friesen; Wouter Koudstaal; Martin H Koldijk; Gerrit Jan Weverling; Just P J Brakenhoff; Peter J Lenting; Koert J Stittelaar; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Ronald Kompier; Jaap Goudsmit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.