S Ferrante1, A Pedrocchi, G Ferrigno, F Molteni. 1. Neuroengineering and Medical Robotics Laboratory, Bioengineering Department, Politecnico of Milan, Milan, Italy. simona.ferrante@polimi.it
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of cycling induced by functional electrical stimulation (FES) in patients with postacute stroke. METHODS:Twenty postacute inpatients were recruited and were randomly shared in a control group (56+/-9.2 years old, 50.8+/-24.5 days post-stroke) performing the standard rehabilitation (SR) and a FESgroup (51+/-12 years old, 56.1+/-22.8 days post-stroke) performing FES cycling in addition to SR. Both the groups performed 3 hours of rehabilitation per day for 4 weeks. The FES cycling was applied daily for 35 minutes and quadriceps, hamstring, gluteus maximus and tibialis anterior of both the legs were stimulated. The two groups were compared by the following outcome measurements before and after treatment: maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MVC) of quadriceps, walking and sit-to-stand ability, motricity index, upright motor control test and trunk control test. RESULTS: After the treatment, the U-Mann-Whitney test demonstrated that the FES group produced a significantly higher increase of the muscular force produced by both the quadriceps during MVC with respect to the control group (P<0.05). Seventy percent of FES patients learned how to perform the sit to stand movement with three different rising speeds while no control patients develop the ability to perform the task properly. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation including FES cycling was more effective in promoting muscle strength and motor recovery of the lower extremity than therapist-assisted SR alone. Tests on an enlarged number of patients are necessary for generalization before proposing FES cycling in the clinical rehabilitation of post-acute stroke patients.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of cycling induced by functional electrical stimulation (FES) in patients with postacute stroke. METHODS: Twenty postacute inpatients were recruited and were randomly shared in a control group (56+/-9.2 years old, 50.8+/-24.5 days post-stroke) performing the standard rehabilitation (SR) and a FES group (51+/-12 years old, 56.1+/-22.8 days post-stroke) performing FES cycling in addition to SR. Both the groups performed 3 hours of rehabilitation per day for 4 weeks. The FES cycling was applied daily for 35 minutes and quadriceps, hamstring, gluteus maximus and tibialis anterior of both the legs were stimulated. The two groups were compared by the following outcome measurements before and after treatment: maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MVC) of quadriceps, walking and sit-to-stand ability, motricity index, upright motor control test and trunk control test. RESULTS: After the treatment, the U-Mann-Whitney test demonstrated that the FES group produced a significantly higher increase of the muscular force produced by both the quadriceps during MVC with respect to the control group (P<0.05). Seventy percent of FESpatients learned how to perform the sit to stand movement with three different rising speeds while no control patients develop the ability to perform the task properly. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation including FES cycling was more effective in promoting muscle strength and motor recovery of the lower extremity than therapist-assisted SR alone. Tests on an enlarged number of patients are necessary for generalization before proposing FES cycling in the clinical rehabilitation of post-acute strokepatients.
Authors: Stacey E Aaron; Catherine J Vanderwerker; Aaron E Embry; Jennifer H Newton; Samuel C K Lee; Chris M Gregory Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Samuel C K Lee; Jun Ding; Laura A Prosser; Anthony S Wexler; Stuart A Binder-Macleod Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2009-08-24 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Alessandra Pedrocchi; Simona Ferrante; Emilia Ambrosini; Marta Gandolla; Claudia Casellato; Thomas Schauer; Christian Klauer; Javier Pascual; Carmen Vidaurre; Margit Gföhler; Werner Reichenfelser; Jakob Karner; Silvestro Micera; Andrea Crema; Franco Molteni; Mauro Rossini; Giovanna Palumbo; Eleonora Guanziroli; Andreas Jedlitschka; Marco Hack; Maria Bulgheroni; Enrico d'Amico; Peter Schenk; Sven Zwicker; Alexander Duschau-Wicke; Justinas Miseikis; Lina Graber; Giancarlo Ferrigno Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Janne Marieke Veerbeek; Erwin van Wegen; Roland van Peppen; Philip Jan van der Wees; Erik Hendriks; Marc Rietberg; Gert Kwakkel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Y P Ivanenko; G Cappellini; I A Solopova; A A Grishin; M J Maclellan; R E Poppele; F Lacquaniti Journal: Front Comput Neurosci Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 2.380