Literature DB >> 34901170

Encouraging Volitional Pedaling in Functional Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Cycling Using Barrier Functions.

Axton Isaly1, Brendon C Allen1, Ricardo G Sanfelice2, Warren E Dixon1.   

Abstract

Stationary motorized cycling assisted by functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a popular therapy for people with movement impairments. Maximizing volitional contributions from the rider of the cycle can lead to long-term benefits like increased muscular strength and cardiovascular endurance. This paper develops a combined motor and FES control system that tasks the rider with maintaining their cadence near a target point using their own volition, while assistance or resistance is applied gradually as their cadence approaches the lower or upper boundary, respectively, of a user-defined safe range. Safety-ensuring barrier functions are used to guarantee that the rider's cadence is constrained to the safe range, while minimal assistance is provided within the range to maximize effort by the rider. FES stimulation is applied before electric motor assistance to further increase power output from the rider. To account for uncertain dynamics, barrier function methods are combined with robust control tools from Lyapunov theory to develop controllers that guarantee safety in the worst-case. Because of the intermittent nature of FES stimulation, the closed-loop system is modeled as a hybrid system to certify that the set of states for which the cadence is in the safe range is asymptotically stable. The performance of the developed control method is demonstrated experimentally on five participants. The barrier function controller constrained the riders' cadence in a range of 50 ± 5 RPM with an average cadence standard deviation of 1.4 RPM for a protocol where cadence with minimal variance was prioritized and used minimal assistance from the motor (4.1% of trial duration) in a separate protocol where power output from the rider was prioritized.
Copyright © 2021 Isaly, Allen, Sanfelice and Dixon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ) cycling; barrier function; control design; euler-Lagrange; functional electrical stimulation (FES; safety-critical

Year:  2021        PMID: 34901170      PMCID: PMC8652117          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.742986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  12 in total

1.  Distributed Repetitive Learning Control for Cooperative Cadence Tracking in Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling.

Authors:  Victor H Duenas; Christian A Cousin; Courtney Rouse; Emily J Fox; Warren E Dixon
Journal:  IEEE Trans Cybern       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.448

2.  Increased bone mineral density after prolonged electrically induced cycle training of paralyzed limbs in spinal cord injured man.

Authors:  T Mohr; J Podenphant; F Biering-Sorensen; H Galbo; G Thamsborg; M Kjaer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  FES Cycling in Stroke: Novel Closed-Loop Algorithm Accommodates Differences in Functional Impairments.

Authors:  Courtney A Rouse; Ryan J Downey; Chris M Gregory; Christian A Cousin; Victor H Duenas; Warren E Dixon
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Physiologic effects of electrical stimulation leg cycle exercise training in spinal cord injured persons.

Authors:  S P Hooker; S F Figoni; M M Rodgers; R M Glaser; T Mathews; A G Suryaprasad; S C Gupta
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Cycling induced by functional electrical stimulation in children affected by cerebral palsy: case report.

Authors:  E Trevisi; S Gualdi; C De Conti; A Salghetti; A Martinuzzi; A Pedrocchi; S Ferrante
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.874

6.  Cycling with functional electrical stimulation in an adult with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Therese E Johnston; Susan F Wainwright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-04-28

7.  High-intensity resistance training improves muscle strength, self-reported function, and disability in long-term stroke survivors.

Authors:  Michelle M Ouellette; Nathan K LeBrasseur; Jonathan F Bean; Edward Phillips; Joel Stein; Walter R Frontera; Roger A Fielding
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Effects of electric stimulation-assisted cycling training in people with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Thomas W Janssen; J Marijke Beltman; Peter Elich; Peter A Koppe; Hermanna Konijnenbelt; Arnold de Haan; Karin H Gerrits
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Outcomes of a home cycling program using functional electrical stimulation or passive motion for children with spinal cord injury: a case series.

Authors:  Therese E Johnston; Brian T Smith; Oluwabunmi Oladeji; Randal R Betz; Richard T Lauer
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Evaluation of functional electrical stimulation to assist cycling in four adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Ann Tokay Harrington; Calum G A McRae; Samuel C K Lee
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2012-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.