Literature DB >> 18417842

Microwave histoprocessing versus conventional histoprocessing.

Alka Mary Mathai1, Ramadas Naik, Muktha R Pai, Sharada Rai, Poornima Baliga.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to compare the histologic quality of the microwave histoprocessing with that of conventional method and to determine its positive impact on turnaround times and reduction of costs of tissue processing. One hundred and eighty-five paired tissue sections from different organs were taken. Each tissue sections were of size of 15 mm x 10 mm x 3 mm and divided into two; one set as experimental group and the other as control group. The tissues in the experimental group were further divided into six groups and processed by vacuum-microwave method according to six protocols from I to VI. Other tissues in the control group were processed by the conventional method and compared. Overall, the quality of microscopic tissue from both the methods was identical. Microwave processing shortened the time of processing without compromising the overall quality of the histologic section and was cost-effective.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18417842     DOI: 10.4103/0377-4929.40383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pathol Microbiol        ISSN: 0377-4929            Impact factor:   0.740


  10 in total

1.  A Comparison of Conventional and Microwave Decalcification and Processing of Tooth and Mandibular Bone Specimens.

Authors:  A Thirumal Raj; Shankargouda Patil; Roopa S Rao
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

2.  Comparison of routine fixation of tissues with rapid tissue fixation.

Authors:  Meenakshi Tripathi; Rani Bansal; Mamta Gupta; Vinay Bharat
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

3.  Microwave-Based Rapid Tissue Processing Technique: A Novel Aid in Histopathologic Laboratory.

Authors:  Pallavi Mishra; Alokenath Bandyopadhyay; Harish Kumar; Kailash Chandra Dash; Lipsa Bhuyan; Abikshyeet Panda
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  Domestic microwave versus conventional tissue processing: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Bhuvanamha Devi R; Subhashree A R; P J Parameaswari; B O Parijatham
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-03-29

5.  Microwave processing: A boon for oral pathologists.

Authors:  Prasad G Kango; Rs Deshmukh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2011-01

6.  Comparative evaluation of different histoprocessing methods.

Authors:  Kartesh Singla; Simarpreet Virk Sandhu; Rana A G K Pal; Himanta Bansal; Ramanpreet Kaur Bhullar; Preetinder Kaur
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Facts in artifacts.

Authors:  Pr Bindhu; Rekha Krishnapillai; Priya Thomas; P Jayanthi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2013-09

8.  Comparison of routine decalcification methods with microwave decalcification of bone and teeth.

Authors:  R Sangeetha; K Uma; Vidya Chandavarkar
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2013-09

9.  Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions.

Authors:  Archana Srinivasyaiah; Priyanka Nitin; Usha Hegde
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

10.  Effect of Conventional and Microwave Tissue Processing Technique on DNA Integrity: A Comparative Molecular Analysis.

Authors:  Dhara Dwivedi; Sowmya Kasetty; Manisha S Tijare; Shreenivas Kallianpur; Nitin Prabhakar; Raju T Ragavendra; Ami Desai
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2018-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.