Literature DB >> 18417200

Motor programming in apraxia of speech.

Edwin Maas1, Donald A Robin, David L Wright, Kirrie J Ballard.   

Abstract

Apraxia of Speech (AOS) is an impairment of motor programming. However, the exact nature of this deficit remains unclear. The present study examined motor programming in AOS in the context of a recent two-stage model [Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1015-1027; Klapp, S. T. (2003). Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 135-150] that proposes a preprogramming stage (INT) and a process that assigns serial order to multiple programs in a sequence (SEQ). The main hypothesis was that AOS involves a process-specific deficit in the INT (preprogramming) stage of processing, rather than in the on-line serial ordering (SEQ) and initiation of movement. In addition, we tested the hypothesis that AOS involves a central (i.e., modality-general) motor programming deficit. We used a reaction time paradigm that provides two dependent measures: study time (the amount of time for participants to ready a motor response; INT), and reaction time (time to initiate movement; SEQ). Two experiments were conducted to examine INT and SEQ in AOS: Experiment 1 involved finger movements, Experiment 2 involved speech movements analogous to the finger movements. Results showed longer preprogramming time for patients with AOS but normal sequencing and initiation times, relative to controls. Together, the findings are consistent with the hypothesis of a process-specific, but central (modality-independent) deficit in AOS; alternative explanations are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18417200     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  19 in total

1.  Feedforward and feedback control in apraxia of speech: effects of noise masking on vowel production.

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Marja-Liisa Mailend; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Speech and nonspeech: What are we talking about?

Authors:  Edwin Maas
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.484

Review 3.  Contemporary Approaches to the Management of Post-stroke Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Alexandra Basilakos
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.761

Review 4.  The diagnosis and understanding of apraxia of speech: why including neurodegenerative etiologies may be important.

Authors:  Joseph R Duffy; Keith A Josephs
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Neurophysiology of speech differences in childhood apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Peter J Molfese; Nina Gumkowski; Andrea Sorcinelli; Vanessa Harwood; Julia R Irwin; Nicole Landi
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Neural recruitment for the production of native and novel speech sounds.

Authors:  Dana Moser; Julius Fridriksson; Leonardo Bonilha; Eric W Healy; Gordon Baylis; Julie M Baker; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Deficits in sequential processing manifest in motor and linguistic tasks in a multigenerational family with childhood apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Beate Peter; Le Button; Carol Stoel-Gammon; Kathy Chapman; Wendy H Raskind
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  To Lump or to Split? Possible Subtypes of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.773

9.  Modelling speech motor programming and apraxia of speech in the DIVA/GODIVA neurocomputational framework.

Authors:  Hilary E Miller; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas; Pélagie M Beeson; Brad H Story; Kenneth I Forster
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.