OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' views and experiences of the emergency and urgent care system to inform the development of a questionnaire for routine assessment of the system's performance from the patient perspective. METHODS: Qualitative research with people who had recently used the system: 47 people in eight focus groups and 13 individual interviews. RESULTS: Recurrent themes included characteristics of the system which are rarely addressed in service-specific questionnaires, in particular, confusion over the most appropriate service to use for particular health problems, coordination between services and informational continuity across services. Other characteristics were identified which, although commonly included in service-specific questionnaires, could have system-level consequences. These included communication between health professionals and patients, and ease of access to services. For example, patients' perception of poor communication with one service could increase their subsequent use of other services in the system. Proactive behaviour from health professionals was an important system characteristic because it could allay patient anxiety by making patients feel that their concerns were being taken seriously and that staff could sort out problems such as feeling 'stuck in' or 'bounced around' the system. 'Candidacy', whereby eligibility for health care is jointly negotiated between the user and the service provider, was evident as an issue for patients across the social spectrum when seeking help urgently. CONCLUSIONS: Questionnaires designed to assess patients' views and experiences of emergency and urgent care should address system-level as well as service-specific issues in order to address the full range of patient concerns.
OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' views and experiences of the emergency and urgent care system to inform the development of a questionnaire for routine assessment of the system's performance from the patient perspective. METHODS: Qualitative research with people who had recently used the system: 47 people in eight focus groups and 13 individual interviews. RESULTS: Recurrent themes included characteristics of the system which are rarely addressed in service-specific questionnaires, in particular, confusion over the most appropriate service to use for particular health problems, coordination between services and informational continuity across services. Other characteristics were identified which, although commonly included in service-specific questionnaires, could have system-level consequences. These included communication between health professionals and patients, and ease of access to services. For example, patients' perception of poor communication with one service could increase their subsequent use of other services in the system. Proactive behaviour from health professionals was an important system characteristic because it could allay patientanxiety by making patients feel that their concerns were being taken seriously and that staff could sort out problems such as feeling 'stuck in' or 'bounced around' the system. 'Candidacy', whereby eligibility for health care is jointly negotiated between the user and the service provider, was evident as an issue for patients across the social spectrum when seeking help urgently. CONCLUSIONS: Questionnaires designed to assess patients' views and experiences of emergency and urgent care should address system-level as well as service-specific issues in order to address the full range of patient concerns.
Authors: Janet Durbin; Jan Barnsley; Brenda Finlayson; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Elizabeth Lin; Whitney Berta; Josephine McMurray Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Beverly W Henry; Danielle M McCarthy; Anna P Nannicelli; Nicholas P Seivert; John A Vozenilek Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Anne McAteer; Philip C Hannaford; David Heaney; Lewis D Ritchie; Alison M Elliott Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: David Peiris; Alex Brown; Michael Howard; Bernadette A Rickards; Andrew Tonkin; Ian Ring; Noel Hayman; Alan Cass Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-10-28 Impact factor: 2.655