Literature DB >> 19554436

A qualitative study of women's experiences of communication in antenatal care: identifying areas for action.

Rosalind Raine1, Martin Cartwright, Yana Richens, Zuhura Mahamed, Debbie Smith.   

Abstract

To identify key features of communication across antenatal (prenatal) care that are evaluated positively or negatively by service users. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were used to explore communication experiences of thirty pregnant women from diverse social and ethnic backgrounds affiliated to a large London hospital. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Women reported a wide diversity of experiences. From the users' perspective, constructive communication on the part of health care providers was characterised by an empathic conversational style, openness to questions, allowing sufficient time to talk through any concerns, and pro-active contact by providers (e.g. text message appointment reminders). These features created reassurance, facilitated information exchange, improved appointment attendance and fostered tolerance in stressful situations. Salient features of poor communication were a lack of information provision, especially about the overall arrangement and the purpose of antenatal care, insufficient discussion about possible problems with the pregnancy and discourteous styles of interaction. Poor communication led some women to become assertive to address their needs; others became reluctant to actively engage with providers. General Practitioners need to be better integrated into antenatal care, more information should be provided about the pattern and purpose of the care women receive during pregnancy, and new technologies should be used to facilitate interactions between women and their healthcare providers. Providers require communications training to encourage empathic interactions that promote constructive provider-user relationships and encourage women to engage effectively and access the care they need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19554436     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-009-0489-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  18 in total

1.  Patient preferences and health disparities.

Authors:  J N Katz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Active listening in medical consultations: development of the Active Listening Observation Scale (ALOS-global).

Authors:  Thijs Fassaert; Sandra van Dulmen; François Schellevis; Jozien Bensing
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-08-03

Review 3.  Improving communication between health professionals and women in maternity care: a structured review.

Authors:  Rachel E Rowe; Jo Garcia; Alison J Macfarlane; Leslie L Davidson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Women's perceptions of midwifery care: a longitudinal study to shape curriculum development.

Authors:  D M Fraser
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 5.  Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference?

Authors:  S Willems; S De Maesschalck; M Deveugele; A Derese; J De Maeseneer
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-02

Review 6.  Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature.

Authors:  L M Ong; J C de Haes; A M Hoos; F B Lammes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Cultural differences in medical communication: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Barbara C Schouten; Ludwien Meeuwesen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-01-20

8.  Prenatal care use among women of low income: a matter of "taking care of self".

Authors:  Wendy Sword
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2003-03

Review 9.  Patient-doctor communication.

Authors:  Carol Teutsch
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.456

10.  'Referral into a void': opinions of general practitioners and others on single point of access to mental health care.

Authors:  Rosalind Raine; Simon Carter; Tom Sensky; Nick Black
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  14 in total

1.  Midwifery care and patient-provider communication in maternity decisions in the United States.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Laura B Attanasio; Y Tony Yang; Melissa D Avery; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

2.  Working Towards Safe Motherhood: Delays and Barriers to Prenatal Care for Women in Rural and Peri-Urban Areas of Georgia.

Authors:  Erika Meyer; Monique Hennink; Roger Rochat; Zoë Julian; Meredith Pinto; Adrienne D Zertuche; Bridget Spelke; Andrew Dott; Pat Cota
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-07

3.  Influenza vaccine text message reminders for urban, low-income pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Melissa S Stockwell; Carolyn Westhoff; Elyse Olshen Kharbanda; Celibell Y Vargas; Stewin Camargo; David K Vawdrey; Paula M Castaño
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Perception of pregnant women about antenatal care in a cottage hospital in Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Authors:  M I Ekott; U Ovwigho; A Ehigiegba; A Fajola; B Fakunle
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-04

Review 5.  How effective are short message service reminders at increasing clinic attendance? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Guy; Jane Hocking; Handan Wand; Sam Stott; Hammad Ali; John Kaldor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Prenatal psychosocial risk assessment using event history calendars with Black women.

Authors:  Michelle L Munro; Chin Hwa Y Dahlem; Jody R Lori; Kristy K Martyn
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012-06-14

7.  Knowledge Valuation by Iranian Women with High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Content Analysis.

Authors:  Zahra Shojaeian; Talat Khadivzadeh; Ali Sahebi; Hossein Kareshki; Fatemeh Tara
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2020-07

8.  Antenatal needs of couples following fertility treatment: a qualitative study in primary care.

Authors:  Lydia Rm French; Debbie J Sharp; Katrina M Turner
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  African American women and prenatal care: perceptions of patient-provider interaction.

Authors:  Chin Hwa Y Dahlem; Antonia M Villarruel; David L Ronis
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 1.967

10.  Parent opinions about use of text messaging for immunization reminders.

Authors:  Carolyn Rose Ahlers-Schmidt; Amy K Chesser; Angelia M Paschal; Traci A Hart; Katherine S Williams; Beryl Yaghmai; Sapna Shah-Haque
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.