Literature DB >> 18415567

[Postoperative pain.].

H Bergmann1.   

Abstract

A short survey about the different methods available for producing postoperative analgesia is given, the goal being to make it clear to the clinician that there are quite a number of techniques to be used although the everyday clinical practice often sticks to simple and not too effective methods of pain treatment following surgery. Initially presenting short informations about the neurophysiology of pain and the pathogenesis and causes of postoperative pain two main groups of producing analgesia are then discussed.Thefirst group deals with the systemic use of analgesics be it nonnarcotic analgesic antipyretics or narcotic analgesics (opioids). As for the first subgroup the peripheral action of these drugs (metamizol, acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol) is brought about by blocking the synthesis of prostaglandins. These substances can only be used for very moderate postoperative pain f.i. following head and neck surgery. The strong acting opioids belong to the second subgroup. Recent informations on receptor sites in the brain and cord and the subgrouping of the receptors throws new light on the understanding of the different effects of these drugs and on the pathomechanisms of agonistic, antagonistic and mixed activities. The clinically used opioids then are mentioned (morphine, fentanyl, methadon, pethidin, piritramide, tilidin, buprenorphin and pentazocine) and dosage, duration of action, antagonisms and untoward side effects are presented. Stress is laid on the recent development of patient-controlled analgesia with all its advantages. Thesecond main group of methods for postoperative analgesia consists of regional anesthesia techniques as there are brachial plexus block, intercostal block and the continuous epidural analgesia using both local anesthetics and spinal opioids. The brachial plexus block in continuous form is absolutely able to prevent pain after operations in the shoulder-arm-region and can be prolonged even for weeks using catheter techniques. The intercostal block on the other hand practically can be performed only as single injection technique being relatively simple however from the technical point of view. The catheter epidural analgesia is the most important method within this group. In comparison to the centrally acting opioids the epidural technique brings some distinct advantages especially in the cardiorespiratory risk case. Choosing between "top up"-technique and continuous infusion of the local anaesthetic depends on the individual circumstances the latter method apparently giving a more steady level of analgesia. The spinal opioid techniques finally gain more and more importance during the last years. They present clear advantages over the local anesthetic methods as there are the long lasting analgesia and the selective blockade of pain not touching motor and sympathetic nerve fibers. A delayed respiratory depression however might be a serious danger showing an incidence of 0,3% in the epidural and some 10% in the subarachnoid route. Aiming to inform the clinician once again about the vast field of possibilities available to make the postoperative course painfree it is hoped that this important task in the postoperative period will be handled with more consequence and effectivity in the future.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 18415567     DOI: 10.1007/BF02529111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  40 in total

1.  The effects of morphine and nalorphine-like drugs in the nondependent, morphine-dependent and cyclazocine-dependent chronic spinal dog.

Authors:  P E Gilbert; W R Martin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  The effects of morphine- and nalorphine- like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog.

Authors:  W R Martin; C G Eades; J A Thompson; R E Huppler; P E Gilbert
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  M Jeffries
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 4.  Local anaesthetic techniques for prevention of postoperative pain.

Authors:  E N Armitage
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Epidural narcotics for postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  P R Bromage; E Camporesi; D Chestnut
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 6.  [Opiate receptors].

Authors:  L Latasch; R Christ
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Mechanism for bupivacaine depression of cardiac conduction: fast block of sodium channels during the action potential with slow recovery from block during diastole.

Authors:  C W Clarkson; L M Hondeghem
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  [Peridural opiate analgesia. Clinical results of a 2-year study].

Authors:  M Zenz; S Piepenbrock; M Tryba; H Brämswig
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Acute cardiovascular toxicity of intravenous amide local anesthetics in anesthetized ventilated dogs.

Authors:  P Liu; H S Feldman; B M Covino; R Giasi; B G Covino
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Comparative cardiotoxicity of bupivacaine and lidocaine in the isolated perfused mammalian heart.

Authors:  R D Tanz; T Heskett; R W Loehning; C A Fairfax
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Postoperative pain therapy with piritramide and metamizole. A randomized study in 120 patients with intravenous on-demand analgesia after abdominal surgery.].

Authors:  J Jage; J Göb; W Wagner; T Henneberg; K A Lehmann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.107

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.