Literature DB >> 18415211

[Postoperative pain therapy with piritramide and metamizole. A randomized study in 120 patients with intravenous on-demand analgesia after abdominal surgery.].

J Jage1, J Göb, W Wagner, T Henneberg, K A Lehmann.   

Abstract

In this randomized study, the efficacy of i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was determined for the opioid piritramide (a pure mu-receptor agonist) and the antipyretic analgesic metamizole (Dipyrone) in three groups of patients following abdominal surgery. The doses of piritramide were 1.5 mg (40 patients) and 3 mg (40 patients) on demand. In addition, we studied the effect of 71 mg metamizole in combination with on-demand boluses of 1.5 mg piritramide in 40 patients. During PCA we estimated the degree of analgesia (verbal gain rating scale, visual analog scale) and monitored the ventilation, vigilance, and typical drug side effects over a period of 24 h. The individual demand for analgesic drugs varied markedly. The mean consumption of piritramide during the study was 46.5 mg in the group with 1.5 mg per bolus and 68.6 mg in the group with 3.0 mg. The resulting pain relief was satisfactory in both groups. The combination of piritramide 1.5 mg and metamizole 71 mg per bolus resulted in a reduction of mean Piritramide-consumption to 44.1 mg, and the pain relief was similar to that produced in the group treated with 3 mg piritramide per bolus. The intensity of typical side effects of opioids and antipyretic analgesics (nausea, vomiting, lowering of respiratory frequency, sweating) was low and always easily controlled. The acceptance by patients, nurses, and physicians of PCA was high. PCA with on-demand intravenous injection of the combination of piritramide and metamizole improved the degree of analgesia and concomitantly reduced the opioid dose.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 18415211     DOI: 10.1007/BF02527827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  27 in total

Review 1.  The scientific basis of patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  L E Mather; H Owen
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.669

2.  Clinical evaluation of the new analgesic piritramide.

Authors:  A Saarne
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  [Status of postoperative pain therapy in West Germany. Results of a representative survey].

Authors:  K A Lehmann; C Henn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Addiction rare in patients treated with narcotics.

Authors:  J Porter; H Jick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  [Dipidolor (piritramid)--a new morphine-like analgesic].

Authors:  H J Kampehl; G Benad
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena)       Date:  1975-03-01

6.  [Comparative clinical investigations on the cardiovascular effects of piritramide (dipidolor) and fentanyl (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Seitz; G Hempelmann; E Schleussner; S Piepenbrock
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Ibuprofen in the management of postoperative pain.

Authors:  H Owen; R J Glavin; N A Shaw
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Patient-controlled analgesic therapy, Part II: Individual analgesic demand and analgesic plasma concentrations of pethidine in postoperative pain.

Authors:  A Tamsen; P Hartvig; C Fagerlund; B Dahlström
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Incidence and characteristics of pain in a sample of medical-surgical inpatients.

Authors:  Marilee Donovan; Paula Dillon; Lora McGuire
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Chronic use of opioid analgesics in non-malignant pain: report of 38 cases.

Authors:  Russell K Portenoy; Kathleen M Foley
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  9 in total

1.  The opiate-sparing effect of dipyrone in post-operative pain therapy with morphine using a patient-controlled analgesic system.

Authors:  G Tempel; B von Hundelshausen; W Reeker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Piritramide versus oxycodone for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. Opioid-induced side effects].

Authors:  H Sebastian
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Reduced postoperative opioid requirement with perioperative administration of naproxen. A randomized study in 86 patients with intravenous on-demand analgesia after orthopaedic surgery.].

Authors:  P Steffen; S Opderbeck; W Seeling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  [Perioperative analgesia in adults : The concept of balanced analgesia.].

Authors:  J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  [Combined intravenous administration of diclofenac and apazone for postoperative analgesia A randomized study of 112 patients with access to i. v. on-demand analgesia after minor orthopaedic operations.].

Authors:  P Steffen; S Wiedemann; M Georgieff; J Hähnel; H Treiber; W Seeling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  [Patient-controlled analgesia with piritramide for postoperative pain relief in general surgery: a prospective observational study.].

Authors:  B M Ure; K Ullmann; E Neugebauer; J Bende; H Troidl
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  [A device for patient-controlled intranasal analgesia (PCINA).].

Authors:  H W Striebel; M Römer; W Philippi; R Schwagmeier
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  [Implementation of standardized postoperative pain therapy for orthopaedic patients. Comparison between unsystematic and standardized pain therapy].

Authors:  S Goebel; N Wollmerstedt; A Lobmüller; M Walther; S Kirschner; J Eulert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  Metamizole-associated adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Kötter; Bruno R da Costa; Margrit Fässler; Eva Blozik; Klaus Linde; Peter Jüni; Stephan Reichenbach; Martin Scherer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.