Literature DB >> 18415396

[Oral administration of slow-release naloxone for prevention of constipation but not analgesia following oral morphine.].

I Jurna1, J Baldauf.   

Abstract

Prolonged administration of morphine for the treatment of chronic pain causes constipation requiring the use of laxatives, which may result in electrolyte deficits. Morphine-induced constipation is due to the binding of the drug to opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract and the brain, where it mimics the actions of enkephalins. The effect on the gastrointestinal tract seems to be more intense than the central effect. The particular pharmacokinetic of naloxone makes it possible to reduce or abolish the constipation that follows oral administration of morphine without markedly interfering with the central effect of morphine, i.e. analgesia. The results obtained with oral administration to rats of morphine and naloxone in aqueous solution have already been published [17]. Oral morphine in doses of 1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg reduce the intestinal transit time in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2, filled circles). Doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg are as effective as 5 mg/kg. Naloxone 10 mg/kg administered together with morphine either prevented or attenuated the constipating effect of morphine (Fig. 2, open circles). Tail-flick latency was used as an indicator of analgesia in the animal experiment; it was significantly increased 1, 2 and 3 h after oral administration of morphine 2.5 mg/kg (Fig. 3, hatched columns). When naloxone 10 mg/kg was given with the morphine, there was no significant reduction in tail-flick latency (Fig. 3, cross-hatched columns). Thus, oral administration of naloxone in aqueous solution antagonized the constipating effect of morphine without interfering with the antinociceptive effect of morphine. Experiments carried out with oral administration to rats of slow-release naloxone instead of naloxone in aqueous solution have not so far been published. Slow-release naloxone 5 mg/kg abolished the slowing of intestinal transit caused by oral morphine 2.5 mg/kg (Fig. 4, left-hand columns). The increase in transit time following morphine 5 mg/kg was deminished by simultaneous oral administration of slow-release naloxone 3 and 5 mg/kg in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4, right-hand columns). The increase in tail-flick latency caused by morphine 2.5 mg/kg was reduced but not abolished by simultaneous administration of naloxone 5 mg/kg (Fig. 5). Slow-release naloxone 3 or 5 mg/kg reduced the duration without interfering with the maximum of the antinociceptive effect of morphine 5 mg/kg (Fig. 6). These results show that slow-release naloxone is more effective than naloxone in aqueous solution in antagonizing the effects of morphine: after oral administration of the slow-release preparation, even the central action of morphine is reduced. Provided that the anatomical organization of the haemorrhoidal veins in the rat is similar to that in man, slow-release naloxone will be carried by the matrix, to which it is absorbed further down in the gastrointestinal tract. It may thus even reach the rectum, from where, after having been absorbed, it bypasses the liver, enters the central nervous system and reduces the antinociceptive effect of morphine. In conclusion, it can be stated that oral administration of naloxone in combination with morphine may help to prevent constipation during the treatment of chronic pain.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 18415396     DOI: 10.1007/BF02529868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  45 in total

1.  Inhibition of gastric emptying and drug absorption by narcotic analgesics.

Authors:  W S Nimmo; R C Heading; J Wilson; P Tothill; L F Prescott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  In vitro pharmacology of the opioid peptides, enkephalins and endorphins.

Authors:  A A Waterfield; R W Smokcum; J Hughes; H W Kosterlitz; G Henderson
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1977-05-15       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  Determination of receptors that mediate opiate side effects in the mouse.

Authors:  A G Hayes; M B Tyers
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Constipation in the cancer patient: causes and management.

Authors:  R K Portenoy
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.456

5.  Failure of (+)-naloxone to accelerate feline colonic transit.

Authors:  B Krevsky; R S Fisher; A Cowan
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1990-02-15

6.  Comparative effects of analgesics on pain threshold, respiratory frequency and gastrointestinal propulsion.

Authors:  A F GREEN
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol Chemother       Date:  1959-03

7.  Opiates and the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  S J Konturek
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Naloxone, a specific opioid antagonist, reverses chronic idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  M J Kreek; R A Schaefer; E F Hahn; J Fishman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Acute effects of morphine and opioid peptides on the motility and responses of rat colon to electrical stimulation.

Authors:  M G Gillan; D Pollock
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Effects of an enkephalin analog on motility of the small and large intestine in the cat.

Authors:  M Wienbeck; M Blasberg
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.000

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Strong opioids and constipation].

Authors:  A Schwarzer; F Nauck; E Klaschik
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  [Opioids for cancer pain treatment. Efficacy and side effects].

Authors:  E Klaschik; K E Clemens
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Incidence of constipation in patients with outpatient opioid therapy].

Authors:  S Tafelski; T Beutlhauser; F Bellin; E Reuter; T Fritzsche; C West; M Schäfer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  [Oral papaverine prevents morphine-induced constipation without interfering with analgesia achieved with oral morphine].

Authors:  I Jurna; K Jurna; J Baldauf; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Managing opioid-induced constipation in advanced illness: focus on methylnaltrexone bromide.

Authors:  Katri Elina Clemens; Eberhard Klaschik
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 6.  Constipation--modern laxative therapy.

Authors:  E Klaschik; F Nauck; C Ostgathe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  [Pharmacotherapy of cancer pain : 2. Use of opioids.].

Authors:  N I Cherny; R K Portenoy; M Raber; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  [Constipation after tilidine/naloxone and tramadol in comparison to codeine. A dose response study in human volunteers].

Authors:  E Freye; B Rosenkranz; B Neruda
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-10-28       Impact factor: 1.107

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.