Literature DB >> 8923067

The opiate-sparing effect of dipyrone in post-operative pain therapy with morphine using a patient-controlled analgesic system.

G Tempel1, B von Hundelshausen, W Reeker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether dipyrone has an opiate-sparing effect in post-operative pain therapy compared with placebo during patient-controlled morphine therapy (PCA) and to compare the effects on analgesia and respiratory and coagulation parameters.
DESIGN: Randomized, observer-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.
SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 106 adult patients who were to undergo abdominal or urological surgery under 90-min standardized inhalational anaesthesia were entered and 103 were included in the efficacy analysis (53 on dipyrone, 50 on placebo).
INTERVENTIONS: Preprogrammed PCA (0.03 mg morphine/kg per bolus) with either dipyrone (initially 2.0 g i.v. and 1.0 g/2 ml i.v. at 4, 8 and 16 h) or placebo (saline). MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Cumulative morphine consumption was calculated automatically during PCA. Pain intensity and pain relief and the investigator's global assessments of efficacy and tolerability were recorded on five-point verbal rating scales. Vital signs, standard laboratory parameters, respiratory rate, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) and of oxygen, partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and Quick values were recorded. Total consumption of opiates in the dipyrone group (median 31.6 mg) was significantly less (p = 0.00015) than in the placebo group (median 50.3 mg), while pain relief (area under the curve) AUC was the same for both PCA+dipyrone (median 4.1) and PCA+placebo (median 3.9). Global assessment of efficacy was good to excellent in more than 90% of cases in both groups. Vital signs, respiratory rate, PCO2, PTT and Quick did not differ between groups. Adverse events were mainly nausea and/or vomiting (dipyrone, n = 4; placebo, n = 1); 1 patient in the placebo group had bradycardia. Three serious adverse events were unrelated to study medication. In 1 patient, the PCA programme malfunctioned and had to be changed.
CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant administration of dipyrone with on-demand morphine (PCA) reduces opiate consumption while maintaining post-operative pain relief with a low incidence of side-effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923067     DOI: 10.1007/bf01699225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  22 in total

1.  AGRANULOCYTOSIS INDUCED BY DIPYRONE, A HAZARDOUS ANTIPYRETIC AND ANALGESIC.

Authors:  C M HUGULEY
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1964-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Mishaps with patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  The morphine sparing effects of diclofenac sodium following abdominal surgery.

Authors:  N B Hodsman; J Burns; A Blyth; G N Kenny; C S McArdle; H Rotman
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Diclofenac versus dipyrone in acute renal colic: a double-blind controlled trial.

Authors:  R Miralles; J Camí; J Gutiérrez; J Torné; J M Garcés; J M Badenas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Nongastrointestinal adverse reactions to NSAID.

Authors:  G P Velo; R Milanino
Journal:  J Rheumatol Suppl       Date:  1990-02

6.  Use of ketorolac after lower abdominal surgery. Effect on analgesic requirement and surgical outcome.

Authors:  R K Parker; B Holtmann; I Smith; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  The morphine sparing effect of ketorolac tromethamine. A study of a new, parenteral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  G W Gillies; G N Kenny; R E Bullingham; C S McArdle
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Incidence and characteristics of pain in a sample of medical-surgical inpatients.

Authors:  Marilee Donovan; Paula Dillon; Lora McGuire
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  [Treatment of postoperative pain with intravenous PCA system. Comparison with morphine, metamizole, and buprenorphine].

Authors:  L M Torres; F Collado; J M Almarcha; V G Huertas; P de Antonio; M Rodríguez
Journal:  Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  Patient-controlled analgesia for acute pain.

Authors:  M Dubois
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.442

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Concepts for perioperative pain therapy. A critical stocktaking].

Authors:  S Reichl; E Pogatzki-Zahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Considerations concerning the perioperative use of metamizole].

Authors:  R Sittl; P Bäumler; A-M Stumvoll; D Irnich; B Zwißler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Pediatric perioperative systemic pain therapy: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations on pediatric perioperative pain management].

Authors:  B Messerer; G Grögl; W Stromer; W Jaksch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 4.  Metamizole-associated adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Kötter; Bruno R da Costa; Margrit Fässler; Eva Blozik; Klaus Linde; Peter Jüni; Stephan Reichenbach; Martin Scherer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Neuroleptanalgesia for acute abdominal pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew C Miller; Abbas M Khan; Alberto A Castro Bigalli; Kerry A Sewell; Alexandra R King; Shadi Ghadermarzi; Yuxuan Mao; Shahriar Zehtabchi
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.133

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.