Literature DB >> 18414634

Genetic variants associated with arsenic susceptibility: study of purine nucleoside phosphorylase, arsenic (+3) methyltransferase, and glutathione S-transferase omega genes.

Sujata De Chaudhuri1, Pritha Ghosh, Nilendu Sarma, Papiya Majumdar, Tanmoy Jyoti Sau, Santanu Basu, Susanta Roychoudhury, Kunal Ray, Ashok K Giri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individual variability in arsenic metabolism may underlie individual susceptibility toward arsenic-induced skin lesions and skin cancer. Metabolism of arsenic proceeds through sequential reduction and oxidative methylation being mediated by the following genes: purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), arsenic (+3) methyltransferase (As3MT), glutathione S-transferase omega 1 (GSTO1), and omega 2 (GSTO2). PNP functions as arsenate reductase; As3MT methylates inorganic arsenic and its metabolites; and both GSTO1 and GSTO2 reduce the metabolites. Alteration in functions of these gene products may lead to arsenic-specific disease manifestations.
OBJECTIVES: To find any probable association between arsenicism and the exonic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the above-mentioned arsenic-metabolizing genes, we screened all the exons in those genes in an arsenic-exposed population.
METHODS: Using polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, we screened the exons in 25 cases (individuals with arsenic-induced skin lesions) and 25 controls (individuals without arsenic-induced skin lesions), both groups drinking similar arsenic-contaminated water. The exonic SNPs identified were further genotyped in a total of 428 genetically unrelated individuals (229 cases and 199 controls) for association study.
RESULTS: Among four candidate genes, PNP, As3MT, GSTO1, and GSTO2, we found that distribution of three exonic polymorphisms, His20His, Gly51Ser, and Pro57Pro of PNP, was associated with arsenicism. Genotypes having the minor alleles were significantly overrepresented in the case group: odds ratio (OR) = 1.69 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-2.66] for His20His; OR = 1.66 [95% CI, 1.04-2.64] for Gly51Ser; and OR = 1.67 [95% CI, 1.05-2.66] for Pro57Pro.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the three PNP variants render individuals susceptible toward developing arsenic-induced skin lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  As3MT; GSTO1; GSTO2; PNP; arsenic; skin lesion; susceptibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18414634      PMCID: PMC2291000          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


Arsenic is recognized as a potent environmental toxicant that causes severe health problems in populations chronically exposed to arsenic-contaminated drinking water. However, the disease manifestations often depend on individual genetic variability. Corroborative of this view, although more than 6 million individuals in West Bengal, India, are endemically exposed to inorganic arsenic, only 300,000 people show arsenic-induced skin lesions, the hallmark sign of chronic arsenic exposure (Chakraborti et al. 2002). This fact clearly elucidates that genetic variability plays a critical role in susceptibility toward arsenic toxicity. It is worthwhile to mention that in West Bengal, groundwater in 9 of 18 districts is contaminated with arsenic, far above the acceptable limit of 10 μg/L [Frost et al. 2003; World Health Organization (WHO) 2004]. Chronic arsenic exposure causes various skin manifestations that include keratosis on palms and soles, hypopigmentation, characteristic raindrop pigmentations on chest, back, and legs, and in extreme cases, in situ carcinoma or Bowen disease (Basu et al. 2004; Guha Mazumder 2003). These skin lesions generally develop with a latency period spanning more than 10 years from first exposure; however, the latency period may be as short as 6 months, depending on the concentration of arsenic in drinking water, volume of intake, and health and nutritional status (Haque et al. 2003). In addition to skin lesions, other clinical manifestations of chronic arsenicism include peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular diseases, respiratory problems, conjunctivitis, various reproductive abnormalities, and ultimately, malignancies in a number of organs including skin, lung, and bladder [International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 2004]. Although it is well known that arsenic can cause cellular toxicity and carcinogenicity, the underlying mechanism is yet undefined. Our survey of the published literature (1992–2007) found that alterations in the arsenic metabolism pathway, recently termed “arsenic biotransformation,” may actually explain the molecular mechanism of arsenicism. To date, two pathways have been proposed to elucidate arsenic metabolism in humans. The classical pathway suggests that once arsenate (AsV) enters the cell via phosphate transporter [National Research Council (NRC) 1999], it undergoes sequential reduction and oxidative methylation, with only one end product, dimethyl arsinate (DMAV) (Vahter 2002). The newly proposed alternative pathway suggests that arsenic either binds to certain proteins (Naranmandura et al. 2006) or conjugates with glutathione (Hayakawa et al. 2005), and subsequent methylation results into two end products: methyl arsonate (MMAV) and DMAV. In both pathways, purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) reduces AsV, and glutathione S-transferase omega 1 (GSTO1) and omega 2 (GSTO2) reduce all the pentavalent arsenic species (AsV, MMAV, and DMAV). Conversely, arsenic (+3) methyltransferase (As3MT) methylates the trivalent arsenic species (AsIII, MMAIII, and DMAIII) (Engström et al. 2007). Given the roles of these enzymes in arsenic biotransformation, functionally relevant genetic polymorphisms of these genes (PNP, As3MT, GSTO1, and GSTO2) are likely to produce interindividual variations in arsenic metabolism and thus susceptibility toward arsenic toxicity. To identify the genetic variants, we performed detailed screening of exonic regions in arsenic-metabolizing genes. Information regarding all genes studied was obtained from our review of the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez) and published literature, which suggests that six polymorphisms occur in the exonic region of PNP gene, containing six exons (accession no. NM_000270, location 14q11.2). Among these, one is located in the 5′UTR (rs17881206); three (His20His, Gly51Ser, Pro57Pro) in exon 2; one in exon 5 (Ala174Ala); and one in the 3′UTR (rs7785) (Yu et al. 2003). Several exonic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are also reported (Arg173Trp, Met287Thr, Thr306Ile, Ile132Phe, Tyr135Asn, Gly140Ala) (Wood et al. 2006) in As3MT containing 11 exons (NM_020682, location 10q24). Two members from the glutathione S-transferase family, GSTO1 (NM_004832) and GSTO2 (NM_183239), mapped to chromosome 10q are 7.5 kb from each other and contain 6 exons each. In GSTO1, although six exonic SNPs (Cys32Tyr, Ala140Asp, −/AGG, Glu208Lys, Thr217Asn, Ala236Val) have been identified in various world populations (Mukherjee et al. 2006), there has been a single report of a Thr217Asn variant in the dbSNP but not yet reported in any population (Whitebread et al. 2003). Four nonsynonymous exonic SNPs (Val114Ile, Cys130Tyr, Asn142Asp, Leu158Ile) were also reported in GSTO2 (Mukherjee et al. 2006). Our goal in this study was to identify exonic SNPs in the above-mentioned arsenic-metabolizing genes in the arsenic-exposed population of West Bengal and to ascertain a possible association between any of the identified exonic SNPs and development of arsenic-induced skin lesions.

Materials and Methods

Study sites and subject selection

From previous survey reports, we selected three districts of West Bengal that were identified as the most arsenic-affected region at the level of ground-water contamination (Chowdhury et al. 2000). For our field survey, we chose several villages in the following three districts: North 24 Parganas (five villages from four administrative blocks designated as Gaighata, Habra, Deganga, and Baduria), Nadia (two villages from Haringhata block), and Murshidabad (three villages from Bhagabangola block I and Bhagabangola block II). The detailed procedure of field survey and sample collection has been described previously (De Chaudhuri et al. 2006; Ghosh et al. 2006, 2007). In the present study, we recruited a total of 428 genetically unrelated study subjects, including 229 cases and 199 controls. The inclusion criteria for cases were based on the presence of more than one characteristic skin lesion, the hallmark sign of arsenicism as diagnosed by dermatologists. For selection of controls, we recruited genetically unrelated individuals without arsenic-induced skin lesions from the same villages; preferentially, family members of the cases who were related by marriage so that the exposure level through drinking water was similar. During our epidemiologic survey, we carried out a detailed pedigree analysis for each proband, rejecting the selection of parent–offspring or siblings from the same family, to avoid genetic overmatching. We also took the detailed case reports of study participants, including age, sex, addiction (in the form of both tobacco smoking and chewing), occupation, food habits, source of drinking water, and medical history. Questionnaire-generated data revealed that these individuals were exposed to arsenic only through groundwater, as tube wells were the only source of drinking water in these villages; any possibility of arsenic consumption through seafood was also ruled out. We obtained informed consent from all the study participants prior to the collection of drinking water and other biological samples such as blood, urine, nail, and hair. The study protocols adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki II (2000) and was approved by the Indian Institute of Chemical Biology Institutional Review Board.

Arsenic exposure assessment

To assess the overall load of arsenic in the body, we estimated arsenic content in drinking water, nail, hair, and urine samples. As arsenic shows strong reactivity and therefore affinity toward thiol compounds, it preferentially accumulates in peripheral keratin-rich tissues such as skin, nail, and hair. The detailed description of arsenic estimation and pretreatment procedure of biological samples and water has been reported previously (Buchet et al. 1981; Chatterjee et al. 1995; Das et al. 1995). We used flow injection–hydride generation–atomic absorption spectrometry (FI-HG-AAS) to estimate arsenic content in different biological samples (urine, nail, and hair) and drinking water. A Model Analyst-700 spectrometer at our institute equipped with a Hewlett-Packard Vectra computer with GEM software (Hewlett-Packard, Houston, TX, USA) , and arsenic lamp (lamp current 380 mA) was used for this purpose.

Genotyping

Exon screening for all the genes was initially carried out in 25 cases and 25 controls to identify the exonic SNPs in our population. All identified polymorphisms in our population were further validated in 229 cases and 199 controls for association study. DNA extraction from blood was carried out using standard protocols (Sambrook 1989). To amplify the exonic regions, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a 25-μL reaction volume using standard buffer, MgCl2 (1.5 μM), deoxyribonucleotides (200 μM), and Taq polymerase supplied by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in an MJ Research PTL-225 thermocycler (GeneAmp-9700; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences of flanking primers (Clontec, Mountain View, CA, USA) for exons of all the genes are described in Supplemental Material, Table 1 (online at http://www.ehponline.org/members/2008/10581/suppl.pdf). All PCR products were analyzed by agarose (1.5%) or polyacrylamide gel (6%) electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed under ultraviolet light. Bidirectional sequencing was done in an ABI prism 3100 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems), using Big Dye Terminator, pre-treated with Exo-SAP (Amersham Life Sciences, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). Samples with ambiguous chromatograms, as well as those containing SNPs observed in only a single sample, were subjected to a second, independent round of amplification, followed by DNA sequencing. The sequence chromatograms obtained were analyzed with Chromas 2.32 (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Tewantin, Australia) and compared with the reference sequence for genotyping of respective amplicons [Supplemental Material Table 2 (online at http://www.ehponline.org/members/2008/10581/suppl.pdf)]. The single exonic SNP found in GSTO2 (Asn142Asp) was genotyped by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). The 182-bp PCR product containing Asn142Asp was digested with MboI restriction enzyme (New England BioLabs, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA), which cleaved the DNA fragment to 86- and 96-bp fragments if the polymorphism were present. Five per cent of those samples were further validated with DNA sequencing in a bidirectional manner.

Statistical analysis

We performed an unpaired t-test was performed to calculate statistically significant differences between cases and controls in continuous independent variables (e.g., age, arsenic content in water, urine, nail, hair) by using GraphPad InStat Software (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A chi-square test was used to compare the distribution of sex and haplotypes between two groups. The risk of developing an arsenic-induced skin lesion was calculated as the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), as well as the p-value for exonic SNPs identified in PNP, As3MT, GSTO1, and GSTO2. Extended haplotypes were calculated using the ARLEQUIN software package (Schneider et al. 2000), and linkage disequilibrium (LD; r2) was calculated using the Haploview software package, version 3.32 (Barrett 2005). We performed a chi-square test using proper contingency tables to check the overall variation of the haplotypes between cases and controls, followed by association of a specific haplotype (having all three minor alleles) against the combined haplotypes with arsenicism.

Results

Descriptive characteristics of the total study population are summarized in Table 1. Age, sex, and sociodemographic characteristics are similar in case and control groups. With regard to addiction status (both tobacco smoking and chewing), we did not find any significant deviation between two study groups (p = 0.37), even after stratifying the population in males (p = 0.76) and females (p = 0.66). The difference in mean arsenic content in drinking water and urine between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.92 and p = 0.64). When arsenic content in nail and hair was compared, it was much higher in cases (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) compared with that in the control group.
Table 1

Descriptive characteristics of the study participants.

ParameterControl [n (%)]Case [n (%)]p-Value
Total subjects199229
Male94 (47.24)113 (49.34)0.74
Female105 (52.76)116 (50.66)
Age [years (mean ± SE)]38.21 ± 0.9539 ± 0.730.50
Addiction80 (40.2)103 (44.98)0.37
 Male
  Smoking (bidi/cigarette)28 (50)30 (43.48)0.76
  Tobacco chewing14 (25)19 (27.54)
  Both14 (25)20 (28.98)
 Female
  Smoking (bidi/cigarette)6 (25)7 (20.6)0.66
  Tobacco chewing12 (50)21 (61.8)
  Both6 (25)6 (17.6)
Occupation
 Male
  Cultivation42 (44.68)68 (60.18)
  Business14 (14.89)16 (14.16)
  Daily wage earners18 (19.15)7 (6.19)
  Service3 (3.19)5 (4.42)
  Teacher1 (1.06)5 (4.42)
  Student7 (7.45)2 (1.77)
  Unemployed9 (9.57)10 (8.85)
 Female
  Housewife90 (85.71)99 (85.34)
  Cultivation10 (9.52)7 (6.03)
  Business1 (0.95)1 (0.86)
  Daily wage earners2 (1.9)4 (3.45)
  Service1 (0.95)2 (1.72)
  Student1 (0.95)1 (0.86)
  Unemployed02 (1.72)
Arsenic content (mean ± SE)
 Drinking water (μg/L)161.71 ± 10.71163.16 ± 10.000.92
 Urine (μg/L)283.28 ± 23.73301.17 ± 28.680.64
 Nail* (μg/g)2.39 ± 0.135.39 ± 0.46< 0.001
 Hair* (μg/g)1.61 ± 0.093.13 ± 0.24< 0.001

p < 0.001 [unpaired t-test (two-tailed)].

We screened the entire exonic portion of the four genes in 100 chromosomes (25 cases and 25 controls) to get an initial overview of the commonly occurring SNPs in our population. The minor allele frequencies (MAF) of each variant were also calculated [Supplemental Material, Table 2 (online at http://www.ehponline.org/members/2008/10581/suppl.pdf)]. We detected eight commonly occurring polymorphisms (His20His, Gly51Ser, Pro57Pro in PNP; Met287Thr in As3MT; Ala140Asp, −/AGG, Glu208Lys in GSTO1; and Asn142Asp in GSTO2) in this population, but other reported polymorphisms (rs17881206 at 5′ UTR, rs7785 at 3′ UTR, Ala174Ala in PNP; Arg173Trp, Thr306Ile, Ile132Phe, Tyr135Asn, Gly140Ala in As3MT; Ser86Cys, Thr217Asn, Ala236Val in GSTO1; and Val114Ile, Leu158Ile, Cys130Tyr in GSTO2) were monomorphic in our population. We identified some novel SNPs in PNP and GSTO1. We studied genotypic distribution for these eight commonly occurring SNPs in 229 cases and 199 controls and estimated the association of each of these polymorphisms with the risk of developing arsenic-induced skin lesions (Table 2). The OR between case and control groups was calculated designating the major allele in the homozygous state as referent genotype for all the SNPs. Results indicated that only PNP polymorphisms were associated with arsenicism. Genotypes carrying at least one minor allele (i.e., heterozygous and homozygous genotype for minor alleles) for all three PNP polymorphisms were significantly overrepresented in cases [OR = 1.69 (95% CI, 1.08–2.66) for codon 20; OR = 1.66 (95% CI, 1.04–2.64) for codon 51; and OR = 1.67 (95% CI,1.05–2.66) for codon 57]. The results thus suggest that these individuals carrying minor alleles, either in heterozygous or homozygous condition, are at risk of developing arsenic-induced skin lesions.
Table 2

Risk assessment of PNP polymorphisms between cases and controls.

PolymorphismControla [n (%)]Casea [n (%)]OR (95% CI)p-Value
PNP
 C > T (codon 20)
  C/C160 (80.4)162 (70.7)1.00 (referent)0.02
  C/T + T/T39 (19.6)67 (29.3)1.69 (1.08–2.66)
 G > A (codon 51)
  G/G154 (81.05)160 (72.07)1.00 (referent)0.04
  G/A + A/A36 (18.95)62 (27.93)1.66 (1.04–2.64)
 C > T (codon 57)
  C/C151 (80.75)158 (71.5)1.00 (referent)0.04
  C/T + T/T36 (19.25)63 (28.5)1.67 (1.05–2.66)
As3MT
 T > C (codon 287)
  T/T181 (90.95)206 (90.75)1.00 (referent)0.94
  T/C + C/C18 (9.05)21 (9.25)1.02 (0.53–1.98)
GSTO1
 C > A (codon 140)
  C/C161 (80.9)171 (76.0)1.00 (referent)0.27
  C/A + A/A38 (19.1)54 (24.0)1.34 (0.84–2.13)
 -/AGG (Intron 4, splice donor site)
  AGG/AGG188 (94.5)211 (92.14)1.00 (referent)0.44
  -/AGG11 (5.5)18 (7.86)1.44 (0.67–3.17)
 G > A (codon 208)
  G/G153 (76.9)188 (82.1)1.00 (referent)0.23
  G/A + A/A46 (23.1)41 (17.9)0.72 (0.45–1.16)
GSTO2
 A > G (codon 142)
  A/A105 (52.8)128 (55.9)1.00 (referent)0.58
  A/G + G/G94 (47.2)101 (44.1)0.88 (0.6–1.29)

Case, n = 229; n = control, 199. Discrepancy in the number of genotyped data in some of the loci is due to PCR failure even after multiple independent efforts.

Pairwise haplotypes of PNP polymorphisms and their corresponding LD measured as r2 values were estimated. The LD values were significant among all three paired loci in both the study groups (0.85 for codons 20 and 57; 0.85 for codons 20 and 51; and 0.98 for codons 51 and 57) (not shown). Extended haplotypes considering all three PNP loci were constructed in the following order: codon 20–codon 51–codon 57 (Table 3). It is evident from the haplotypic distribution that the haplotype having highest frequency is the one that contains the major alleles at the respective loci, that is, C-G-C, followed by T-A-T, T-G-C, and C-A-T. The other three haplotypes found showed distribution exclusive to either case or control. Overall, there was no significant variation of haplotype frequency between cases and controls (p = 0.17). However, the specific T-A-T haplotype (i.e., having the minor alleles in the respective loci), against all other haplotypes combined, was significantly associated with arsenicism (p = 0.048) (Table 3).
Table 3

Extended haplotype frequencies of the study population.

PNP haplotypes (codons 20, 51, 57)
Population (n)C-G-CC-G-TC-A-CC-A-TT-G-CT-G-TT-A-Tap-Value
Control (187)32911560320.17
Case (221)36600711157

T-A-T haplotype was found to be overrepresented in cases (p = 0.048).

Discussion

Understanding the detailed metabolic pathway of ingested arsenic is critical in defining the molecular mechanisms of arsenic toxicity and carcinogenicity. The toxic or carcinogenic potential of ingested arsenic depends on a subtle balance between various arsenical intermediates because of retention or excretion. In the present study, the intake and excretion of arsenic between cases and controls were similar, but cases showed significantly higher arsenic accumulation in nail and hair. This load, coupled with the genetic idiosyncrasies of the arsenic-metabolizing genes, determines whether a particular individual will be susceptible to arsenic toxicity. This study shows that of eight exonic polymorphisms studied in four arsenic-metabolizing genes, three polymorphisms of PNP were significantly associated with arsenicism. The following section is a detailed account of the exonic SNPs identified in our population, with special emphasis on their distribution bias among the cases and controls, if any.

PNP

The Gly51Ser polymorphism at codon 51 resides in the proximity of the phosphate or arsenate-binding region of PNP enzyme (residues 56–69). Therefore, the substitution at this position may create some structural modification affecting protein function. However, a functional assay with variants in a case with severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome (Aust et al. 1992; Williams et al. 1987) showed no drastic alteration in enzyme activity. However, the possibility of a conservative change of glycine (nonpolar, uncharged) to serine (polar) to modulate the susceptibility level of individuals exposed to this xenobiotic cannot be ruled out without proper functional assays with the arsenic-exposed individuals. Consistent with the findings of Yu et al. (2003), the strong LD (r2 > 80) between codon 20 and codon 57 loci with codon 51 (Gly51Ser) perhaps explains the association of these two synonymous SNPs with arsenicism. Meza et al. (2005), in his studies with the Mexican population, found no significant correlation between PNP polymorphisms and urinary arsenic metabolites.

As3MT

A number of in vivo and in vitro studies established that As3MT enzyme is indispensable for conversion of the arsenic metabolites to their corresponding methylated products (Drobna et al. 2005, 2006). In our study, screening of the entire coding region revealed only one exonic SNP (Met287Thr) in our population, with a heterozygosity of about 9%, similar to studies with African-American and white American populations (Wood et al. 2006). It should be pointed out that the human major allele at codon 287, Met, is actually the nonancestral allele and that 10 other primates studies encoded Thr at the corresponding position. It would be interesting to assess the basis of the allele flipping in the human and the functional alteration of the protein product with the variant allele, if any.

GSTO1 and GSTO2

Six polymorphisms in the GSTO1 gene (Ser86Cys, Ala140Asp, −/AGG, Glu208Lys, Thr217Asn, Ala236Val) have been reported in various ethnic groups of the world or cited in the databases. Our analysis of GSTO1 could identify only three SNPs (Ala140Asp, −/AGG, Glu208Lys) among them. Generally, GSTO1 exhibits higher thiol transferase activity than GST. Tanaka-Kagawa et al. suggested that Ala140Asp polymorphism reduces thiol transferase activity of GSTO1 (Tanaka-Kagawa et al. 2003); however, another study found no such difference in enzyme activity due to the presence of the variant allele (Whitbread et al. 2003). A study in a Taiwanese population identified a significant association between the Asp140 variant of the GSTO1 gene variant and hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangio-carcinoma, and breast cancer (Marahatta et al. 2006). In fact, the frequency of the variant allele of the Asp140 variant of the GSTO1 gene varies significantly among world populations (Hirakawa et al. 2002; Whitbread et al. 2003). The frequency of the Asp140 variant in our population was 0.13, close to that of the Chinese population, reflecting a similarity within the Asian populations. Two other SNPs identified in our population (−/AGG and Glu208Lys) are reported to be associated with an inability to process inorganic arsenic. The −/AGG polymorphism is caused by a three-base deletion at the exon–intron border of exon 4, which might have potential for missplicing (Marnell et al. 2003). However, we could not find any significant difference in the genotypic distribution of any of the exonic SNPs between cases and controls. There is 64% amino acid identity of GSTO2 enzyme with GSTO1. The minor allele frequency of the only exonic SNP identified in our population, Asn142Asp, is closely similar (0.28) to the European Australians in Canberra and the Chinese population from Hong Kong (Whitbread et al. 2003). This 142Asp variant is the major allele among Bantu Africans in Durban, Caucasian-American, Han-Chinese–American, and Mexican-American populations (Mukherjee et al. 2006), thus raising speculation about any ethnicity-specific selection bias. However, we found no association between the distribution of 142Asp variant and arsenicism in our population.

Conclusion

This study highlights that genetic variants of PNP, one of the important enzymes in arsenic metabolism, are associated with development of arsenic-induced skin lesions. The study also provides basal knowledge of commonly occurring genetic polymorphisms in the protein-coding region of important arsenic-metabolizing genes. We did not find significant association of exonic SNPs in arsenic-metabolizing genes with arsenicism, except PNP. However, the interplay among the genes may be crucial in modulating the arsenic biotransformation pathway, and even minor changes in their functions can be reflected at phenotypic level and hence, in disease manifestation. Detailed functional studies are required in arsenic-exposed populations to understand the mechanisms involved. In this respect, gene knockouts can be used to examine the alterations in resulting in arsenic reduction and methylation pattern and the toxicologic consequences.
  30 in total

1.  JSNP: a database of common gene variations in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Mika Hirakawa; Toshihiro Tanaka; Yoichi Hashimoto; Masako Kuroda; Toshihisa Takagi; Yusuke Nakamura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Characterization of the human Omega class glutathione transferase genes and associated polymorphisms.

Authors:  Astrid K Whitbread; Natasha Tetlow; Helen J Eyre; Grant R Sutherland; Philip G Board
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  2003-03

3.  Glutathione S-transferase omega 1 and omega 2 pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Baidehi Mukherjee; Oreste E Salavaggione; Linda L Pelleymounter; Irene Moon; Bruce W Eckloff; Daniel J Schaid; Eric D Wieben; Richard M Weinshilboum
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.922

4.  Some drinking-water disinfectants and contaminants, including arsenic.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2004

5.  Cytogenetic damage and genetic variants in the individuals susceptible to arsenic-induced cancer through drinking water.

Authors:  Pritha Ghosh; Anamika Basu; Julie Mahata; Sreemanti Basu; Mainak Sengupta; Jayanta K Das; Angshuman Mukherjee; Ajoy K Sarkar; Lakshmikanta Mondal; Kunal Ray; Ashok K Giri
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Arsenic in drinking water and skin lesions: dose-response data from West Bengal, India.

Authors:  Reina Haque; D N Guha Mazumder; Sambit Samanta; Nilima Ghosh; David Kalman; Meera M Smith; Soma Mitra; Amal Santra; Sarbari Lahiri; Subhankar Das; Binay K De; Allan H Smith
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Metabolism and toxicity of arsenic in human urothelial cells expressing rat arsenic (+3 oxidation state)-methyltransferase.

Authors:  Zuzana Drobná; Stephen B Waters; Vicenta Devesa; Anne W Harmon; David J Thomas; Miroslav Stýblo
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Arsenic calamity in the Indian subcontinent What lessons have been learned?

Authors:  Dipankar Chakraborti; Mohammad M Rahman; Kunal Paul; Uttam K Chowdhury; Mrinal K Sengupta; Dilip Lodh; Chitta R Chanda; Kshitish C Saha; Subhash C Mukherjee
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 6.057

9.  Arsenic in ground water in six districts of West bengal, India: the biggest arsenic calamity in the world. Part 2. Arsenic concentration in drinking water, hair, nails, urine, skin-scale and liver tissue (biopsy) of the affected people.

Authors:  D Das; A Chatterjee; B K Mandal; G Samanta; D Chakraborti; B Chanda
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.616

10.  Genetic polymorphisms influencing arsenic metabolism: evidence from Argentina.

Authors:  Karin Schläwicke Engström; Karin Broberg; Gabriela Concha; Barbro Nermell; Margareta Warholm; Marie Vahter
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  26 in total

1.  A case-control study of polymorphisms in xenobiotic and arsenic metabolism genes and arsenic-related bladder cancer in New Hampshire.

Authors:  Corina Lesseur; Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Angeline S Andrew; Rebecca M Ekstrom; Zhongze Li; Karl T Kelsey; Carmen J Marsit; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Precancerous and non-cancer disease endpoints of chronic arsenic exposure: the level of chromosomal damage and XRCC3 T241M polymorphism.

Authors:  Manjari Kundu; Pritha Ghosh; Sanhita Mitra; J K Das; T J Sau; Saptarshi Banerjee; J Christopher States; Ashok K Giri
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Arsenic exposure and toxicology: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Michael F Hughes; Barbara D Beck; Yu Chen; Ari S Lewis; David J Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Exposure to Trace Elements and Risk of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review of Epidemiologic Studies.

Authors:  Natalie H Matthews; Katherine Fitch; Wen-Qing Li; J Steven Morris; David C Christiani; Abrar A Qureshi; Eunyoung Cho
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Interactive Effects of N6AMT1 and As3MT in Arsenic Biomethylation.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Yichen Ge; Ping He; Xushen Chen; Abreu Carina; Yulan Qiu; Diana S Aga; Xuefeng Ren
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Individual susceptibility to arsenic-induced diseases: the role of host genetics, nutritional status, and the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Liang Chi; Bei Gao; Pengcheng Tu; Chih-Wei Liu; Jingchuan Xue; Yunjia Lai; Hongyu Ru; Kun Lu
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Association between polymorphisms in arsenic metabolism genes and urinary arsenic methylation profiles in girls and boys chronically exposed to arsenic.

Authors:  Rogelio Recio-Vega; Tania González-Cortes; Edgar Olivas-Calderón; R Clark Lantz; A Jay Gandolfi; Gladis Michel-Ramirez
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Polymorphisms in the TNF-α and IL10 gene promoters and risk of arsenic-induced skin lesions and other nondermatological health effects.

Authors:  Nilanjana Banerjee; Sujay Nandy; James K Kearns; Apurba K Bandyopadhyay; Jayanta K Das; Papiya Majumder; Santanu Basu; Saptarshi Banerjee; Tanmoy Jyoti Sau; J Christopher States; Ashok K Giri
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Multi-generational impacts of arsenic exposure on genome-wide DNA methylation and the implications for arsenic-induced skin lesions.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Guo; Xushen Chen; Jie Wang; Zhiyue Liu; Daniel Gaile; Hongmei Wu; Guan Yu; Guangyun Mao; Zuopeng Yang; Zhen Di; Xiuqing Guo; Li Cao; Peiye Chang; Binxian Kang; Jinyu Chen; Wen Gao; Xuefeng Ren
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  Association of AS3MT polymorphisms and the risk of premalignant arsenic skin lesions.

Authors:  Olga L Valenzuela; Zuzana Drobná; Erika Hernández-Castellanos; Luz C Sánchez-Peña; Gonzalo G García-Vargas; Víctor H Borja-Aburto; Miroslav Stýblo; Luz M Del Razo
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.