| Literature DB >> 17450230 |
Karin Schläwicke Engström1, Karin Broberg, Gabriela Concha, Barbro Nermell, Margareta Warholm, Marie Vahter.
Abstract
The susceptibility to arsenic-induced diseases differs greatly between individuals, possibly due to interindividual variations in As metabolism that affect retention and distribution of toxic metabolites. To elucidate the role of genetic factors in As metabolism, we studied how polymorphisms in six genes affected the urinary metabolite pattern in a group of indigenous women (n = 147) in northern Argentina who were exposed to approximately 200 microg/L As in drinking water. These women had low urinary percentages of monomethylated As (MMA) and high percentages of dimethylated As (DMA). MMA has been associated with adverse health effects, and DMA has the lowest body retention of the metabolites. The genes studied were arsenic(+III)methyltransferase (AS3MT), glutathione S-transferase omega 1 (GSTO1), 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (MTR), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), and glutathione S-transferases mu 1 (GSTM1) and theta 1 (GSTT1). We found three intronic polymorphisms in AS3MT (G12390C, C14215T, and G35991A) associated with a lower percentage of MMA (%MMA) and a higher percentage of DMA (%DMA) in urine. The variant homozygotes showed approximately half the %MMA compared with wild-type homozygotes. These polymorphisms were in strong linkage, with high allelic frequencies (72-76%) compared with other populations. We also saw minor effects of other polymorphisms in the multivariate regression analysis with effect modification for the deletion genotypes for GSTM1 (affecting %MMA) and GSTT1 (affecting %MMA and %DMA). For pregnant women, effect modification was seen for the folate-metabolizing genes MTR and MTHFR. In conclusion, these findings indicate that polymorphisms in AS3MT-and possibly GSTM1, GSTT1, MTR, and MTHFR-are responsible for a large part of the interindividual variation in As metabolism and susceptibility.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17450230 PMCID: PMC1852682 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Genotype and allele frequencies (%) for all individuals from SAC and previously reported genotype frequencies from other studies.
| SNP, Genotype | SAC | Indigenous American ancestry | European/Hispanic ancestry |
|---|---|---|---|
| GG/GC/CC (G/C) | 6/43/51 (28/72) | NA (58/42) | NA (80/20) |
| CC/CT/TT (C/T) | 6/35/59 (28/72) | NA (62/38) | NA (90/10) |
| GG/AG/AA (G/A) | 6/36/58 (24/76) | NA (50/50) | NA (52/48) |
| GSTM1*1/*0 | 39/61 | NA | 72/28 |
| 83/17 | NA | 65/35 | |
| AA/AG/GG (A/G) | 71/28/1 (85/15) | NA | 61/30/9 (76/24) |
| CC/CT/TT (C/T) | 43/43/14 (64/36) | NA | 48/43/9 (70/30) |
NA, not available.
Wild-type allele denoted first.
The number of individuals with genotype information varies due to insufficient amounts of DNA (mainly for AS3MT 12390 and GSTT1).
Data from Meza et al. (2005).
Data from NCI (2006).
Median metabolite and U-As values.
| Group | No. of cases with metabolite data | %iAs (range) | %MMA (range) | %DMA (range) | U-As [μg/L (range)] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnant women | 37 of 37 | 14 (4.5–27) | 3.1 (0.1–9.0) | 83 (69–92) | 233 (111–401) |
| 2004–2005 women | 110 of 111 | 12 (1–48) | 7.4 (1.2–18) | 80 (47–93) | 272 (94–724) |
Data from Concha et al. (1998b); pregnant women from 2004 and 2005 were included.
Pregnant women were excluded.
Figure 1%MMA for AS3MT G35991A genotypes. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Geometric mean As metabolite values (%), ratios of MMA/iAs and DMA/MMA and U-As for different genotypes for 2004–2005 women.
| Polymorphism | %iAs | %MMA | %DMA | MMA/iAs | DMA/MMA | U-As | No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | 16.7 | 13.6 | 68.3 | 0.82 | 5.0 | 285 | 5 |
| GA | 11.8 | 7.8 | 77.3 | 0.66 | 9.9 | 280 | 43 |
| AA | 11.0 | 6.6 | 80.4 | 0.60 | 12.2 | 261 | 61 |
| | 0.22 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.5 | < 0.001 | 0.6 | |
| AA | 11.2 | 7.3 | 79.0 | 0.65 | 10.8 | 270 | 79 |
| AG | 12.0 | 7.0 | 79.0 | 0.58 | 11.4 | 272 | 29 |
| GG | 21.7 | 14.9 | 62.2 | 0.69 | 4.2 | 228 | 2 |
| | 0.20 | 0.047 | 0.006 | 0.7 | 0.016 | 0.8 | |
Only SNPs with p-values < 0.1 are presented.
All AS3MT SNPs gave very similar results; therefore, only SNP35991 is presented.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01, and
p < 0.001 compared with wild type.
Geometric mean As metabolite values (%), ratios of MMA/iAs and DMA/MMA and U-As for different genotypes for pregnant women.
| Polymorphism | %iAs | %MMA | %DMA | MMA/iAs | DMA/MMA | U-As | No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | 20.9 | 4.3 | 73.7 | 0.21 | 16.9 | 185 | 4 |
| GA | 13.7 | 2.9 | 80.6 | 0.21 | 27.0 | 215 | 9 |
| AA | 13.5 | 2.1 | 82.2 | 0.16 | 46.9 | 245 | 24 |
| | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.033 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |
| | 13.3 | 2.2 | 81.5 | 0.18 | 37.0 | 230 | 29 |
| | 18.2 | 3.5 | 76.7 | 0.22 | 21.6 | 219 | 7 |
| | 0.092 | 0.23 | 0.051 | 0.8 | 0.18 | 0.8 | |
| AA | 13.1 | 2.3 | 82.2 | 0.18 | 35.9 | 270 | 26 |
| AG | 16.9 | 3.0 | 78.2 | 0.18 | 26.3 | 270 | 11 |
| | 0.084 | 0.43 | 0.079 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | |
Only SNPs with p-values < 0.1 are presented.
All AS3MT SNPs gave similar results; therefore, only SNP35991 is presented.
p < 0.05 compared with wild type.
Multivariate regression modeling of effect modification by some genotypes on the distribution of As metabolites (log-transformed).
| β | SE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnant women ( | |||
| iAs ( | 0.33 | ||
| Intercept | 1.1 | 0.95 | 0.27 |
| Genotype 0/1 | 0.97 | 0.48 | 0.052 |
| Genotype0/2 | 1.2 | 0.54 | 0.040 |
| U-As | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| GW | 0.008 | 0.014 | 0.6 |
| Genotype | −0.032 | 0.018 | 0.094 |
| Genotype | −0.036 | 0.020 | 0.081 |
| MMA ( | 0.21 | ||
| Intercept | 0.20 | 2.4 | 0.9 |
| Genotype 0/1 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.050 |
| Genotype 0/2 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.14 |
| U-As | −0.059 | 0.44 | 0.9 |
| GW | 0.039 | 0.036 | 0.3 |
| Genotype | −0.102 | 0.047 | 0.042 |
| Genotype | −0.085 | 0.051 | 0.11 |
| DMA ( | 0.46 | ||
| Intercept | 4.7 | 0.17 | < 0.001 |
| Genotype 0/1 | −0.30 | 0.087 | 0.002 |
| Genotype 0/2 | −0.31 | 0.099 | 0.004 |
| U-As | −0.026 | 0.031 | 0.4 |
| GW | −0.004 | 0.003 | 0.17 |
| Genotype | 0.010 | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Genotype | 0.010 | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| DMA/MMA ( | 0.24 | ||
| Intercept | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.086 |
| Genotype0/1 | −2.8 | 1.2 | 0.033 |
| Genotype0/2 | −2.4 | 1.4 | 0.099 |
| U-As | 0.033 | 0.45 | 0.9 |
| GW | −0.042 | 0.036 | 0.25 |
| Genotype | 0.112 | 0.049 | 0.029 |
| Genotype | 0.095 | 0.052 | 0.078 |
| 2004–2005 women ( | |||
| MMA ( | 0.18 | ||
| Intercept | 2.8 | 0.95 | 0.004 |
| Genotype | −4.4 | 1.3 | 0.001 |
| U-As | −0.12 | 0.17 | 0.5 |
| Genotype | 0.79 | 0.23 | 0.001 |
| Age | −0.005 | 0.003 | 0.1 |
| DMA/MMA ( | 0.17 | ||
| Intercept | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.2 |
| Genotype | 4.6 | 1.5 | 0.001 |
| U-As | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.4 |
| Genotype | −0.85 | 0.26 | 0.002 |
| Age | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.067 |
| 2004–2005 women ( | |||
| MMA ( | 0.12 | ||
| Intercept | −0.31 | 0.83 | 0.7 |
| Genotype | 3.8 | 1.8 | 0.038 |
| U-As | 0.41 | 0.15 | 0.006 |
| Genotype | −0.65 | 0.32 | 0.047 |
| Age | −0.002 | 0.003 | 0.5 |
| DMA ( | 0.11 | ||
| Intercept | 4.4 | 0.16 | < 0.001 |
| Genotype | −0.89 | 0.34 | 0.011 |
| U-As | −0.017 | 0.028 | 0.5 |
| Genotype | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.011 |
| Age | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.073 |
| DMA/MMA ( | 0.12 | ||
| Intercept | 4.7 | 0.92 | < 0.001 |
| Genotype | −4.7 | 2.0 | 0.021 |
| U-As | −0.42 | 0.16 | 0.010 |
| Genotype | 0.81 | 0.36 | 0.026 |
| Age | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.4 |
| 2004–2005 women ( | |||
| MMA ( | 0.17 | ||
| Intercept | 1.36 | 0.75 | 0.074 |
| Genotype 0/1 | −2.82 | 1.5 | 0.058 |
| Genotype 0/2 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 0.6 |
| U-As | 0.14 | 0.133 | 0.3 |
| Genotype | 0.49 | 0.26 | 0.066 |
| Genotype | −0.15 | 0.54 | 0.8 |
| Age | −0.004 | 0.003 | 0.16 |
| Pregnant women ( | |||
| MMA ( | 0.19 | ||
| Intercept | 1.4 | 2.6 | 0.6 |
| Genotype | −2.1 | 1.3 | 0.11 |
| U-As | 0.096 | 0.46 | 0.8 |
| GW | −0.048 | 0.022 | 0.034 |
| Genotype | 0.094 | 0.048 | 0.059 |
For 2004–2005 women, the model contains effect modification by genotype, U-As, and age on the distribution of As metabolites, with an interaction term of U-As*Genotype. For pregnant women, the model contains effect modification by genotype, U-As, and GW on the distribution of As metabolites, with an interaction term of GW*Genotype. AS3MT polymorphisms are not included because no interaction effect was found.
GW data are missing for four individuals.
Proportion of the total variance of the metabolite levels (ln transformed); values are unadjusted.
Individuals with no variant alleles were used as referents and were compared with those with 1 and 2 variant alleles, respectively. In the pregnant women, no individuals with two variant MTR alleles were found.
GSTM1*1/GSTT1*1 were used as referents compared with GSTM1*0/GSTT1*0.
U-As data are missing for four 2004–2005 women.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01, and
p < 0.001 compared with wild type.
Figure 2%DMA (ln transformed) as a function of GW among pregnant women with different MTHFR Ala222Val genotypes. Simple regression lines within each genotype group are presented (the regression lines were not derived from the multivariate regression model presented in Table 5; rather, they illustrate the general direction of interaction).
Figure 3%MMA (ln transformed) as a function of U-As (μg/L) among 2004–2005 women with different MTR Ala919Gly genotypes. Simple regression lines within each genotype group are presented (the regression lines were not derived from the multivariate regression model presented in Table 5; rather, they illustrate the general direction of interaction).
Figure 4%MMA (ln transformed) as a function of U-As (μg/L) among 2004–2005 women with different GSTM1 genotypes. Simple regression lines within each genotype group are presented (the regression lines were not derived from the multivariate regression model presented in Table 5; rather, they illustrate the general direction of interaction).
Figure 5%DMA (ln transformed) as a function of U-As (μg/L) among 2004–2005 women with different GSTT1 genotypes. Simple regression lines within each genotype group are presented (the regression lines were not derived from the multivariate regression model presented in Table 5; rather, they illustrate the general direction of interaction).