| Literature DB >> 18414471 |
G M Caldwell1, C E Jones, Y Soon, R Warrack, D G Morton, G M Matthews.
Abstract
In most colorectal tumours, APC mutation stabilises beta-catenin and mimics elements of Wnt growth factor signalling, but the high frequency of epigenetic loss of Wnt antagonists indicates an additional role for ligand-mediated Wnt signalling. Here, we have investigated the expression of key components of beta-catenin-independent Wnt response pathways to determine whether their profiles change during the transition from normal mucosa to colorectal adenomas. Transcription of the Wnt/planar cell polarity pathway determinant NKD1 (naked cuticle homologue 1) was induced in adenomas by a median 135-fold and in cancers by 7.4-fold. While some Frizzleds (FZDs) were downregulated in adenomas, the Wnt/Ca(2+) receptors FZD3 and FZD6 were induced by a median factor of 6.5 and 4.6, respectively. Naked cuticle homologue 1, FZD3 and FZD6 expression were coordinated in pre-malignant disease, but this relationship was lost in invasive cancers, where FZD induction was seen less frequently. Naked cuticle homologue 1 expression was associated with nuclear localisation of phospho-c-Jun in adenomas. In cultured cells, NKD1 transcription was induced by lithium chloride but FZD3 expression required Wnt growth factor treatment. These data show that Wnt responses are consistently directed towards both beta-catenin-independent routes in early colorectal tumorigenesis and elements of this are retained in more advanced cancers. These beta-catenin-independent Wnt signalling pathways may provide novel targets for chemoprevention of early colorectal tumours.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18414471 PMCID: PMC2361695 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Sequences of primers used in RT–PCR and real-time RT–PCR analysis
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| NKD1 (NM_033119) | F, 5′-CGCCGGGATAGAAAACTACA-3′ | |
| R, 5′-CTGGAGCTCTGAGACCTTGG-3′ | ||
| FZD3 (NM_017412) | F, 5′-ACATCCACCCATGCTTCTTC-3′ | |
| R, 5′-TCGTGACTGTTCATTGAGCC-3′ | ||
| FZD4 (NM_012193) | F, 5′-CCAACATGGCTGTTGAAATG-3′ | |
| R, 5′-GTCTCACTGCCTTTTCCAGG-3′ | ||
| FZD6 (NM_003506) | F, 5′-ATGAGAGAGGTGAAAGCGGA-3′ | |
| R, 5′-TTGGTTCTGAAGAACTGGGG-3′ | ||
| FZD10 (NM_007197) | F, 5′-CCTCCAAGACTCTGCAGTCC-3′ | |
| R, 5′-GACTGGGCAGGGATCTCATA-3′ | ||
|
| ||
| NKD1 (NM_033119) | F, 5′-TCGCCGGGATAGAAAACTACA-3′ | P, 5′-CCAATTTGGGCCTGGCTCCCC-3′ |
| R, 5′-CAGTTCTGACTTCTGGGCCAC-3′ | ||
| FZD3 (NM_017412) | F, 5′-CATGGAGATGTTTGGTGTTCCTT-3′ | P, 5′-TCTGGGAACCTACTGCATTCCATATCTTCAGG-3′ |
| R, 5′-AAGTCGAGGATATGGCTCATCAC-3′ | ||
| KRT8 (NM_002273) | F, 5′-GATCGCCACCTACAGGAAGCT-3′ | P, 5′-CCGGCTCTCCTCGCCCTCCA-3′ |
| R, 5′-ACTCATGTTCTGCATCCCAGACT-3′ | ||
| FZD6 (NM_003506) | F, 5′-ATCTGATGGGTCATTATGACCAGAGT-3′ | |
| R, 5′- TTTGCGAGAGGAAGAAAATGCT-3′ | ||
Figure 1RT–PCR detection of NKD1 in colorectal adenomas. cDNA prepared from 14 matched normal/adenoma pairs (N and A, respectively) was amplified using primers specific for NKD1 together with a positive control (+) and a sample with no cDNA (−) and analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Products can be observed in all adenoma tracks except for samples 6 and 11 but are absent from the normal samples except for 2, 4 and 5.
Summary of RT–PCR results for FZD expression in matched and unmatched adenomas (A) and normal (N) mucosa
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| FZD1 | 6/8 | 5/8 | 0.5 | 2/5 | 6/11 | 62 | 58 | 1 |
| FZD2 | 7/8 | 1/8 | 0.015 | 3/5 | 3/11 | 77 | 21 | 0.003 |
| FZD3 | 1/8 | 6/8 | 0.03 | 1/5 | 7/11 | 15 | 68 | 0.005 |
| FZD4 | 0/8 | 2/8 | 0.25 | 0/5 | 4/11 | 0 | 32 | 0.06 |
| FZD5 | 7/12 | 6/12 | 0.5 | ND | ND | 58 | 50 | 1 |
| FZD6 | 2/8 | 4/8 | 0.25 | 1/5 | 8/11 | 23 | 63 | 0.04 |
| FZD7 | 7/12 | 7/12 | 0.6 | ND | ND | 58 | 58 | 1 |
| FZD8 | 7/8 | 2/7 | 0.063 | 5/5 | 3/11 | 92 | 26 | 0.007 |
| FZD10 | 1/8 | 2/8 | 0.475 | 0/5 | 5/11 | 8 | 37 | 0.1 |
ND=not performed.
Figure 2Real-time RT–PCR analysis of NKD1, FZD3 and FZD6 expression in colorectal adenomas. Relative expression of NKD1 (open bars), FZD3 (grey bars) and FZD6 (striped bars) was determined in a series of adenomas by comparison to their levels in matched normal samples, using real-time RT–PCR as described in the text. Samples were ordered by NKD1 expression levels to reveal any association between the targets. Note that two samples (E and N) were not analysed for FZD6. These adenomas were also stained to assess nuclear accumulation of β-catenin and phospho-c-Jun and the outcome of this is indicated below each cluster of bars where + indicates detection and − indicates a failure to detect nuclear β-catenin (C) and phospho-c-Jun (J).
Figure 3Immunohistochemical detection of β-catenin and phospho-c-Jun in colorectal adenomas. Paraffin sections of fixed adenoma tissue were stained to detect phospho-c-Jun (A and B) and β-catenin (C and D). Representative samples are shown. Positive nuclear localisation was detected in sample (B), shown by the arrow (A and C), whereas in sample M (B and D) the arrow indicates the absence of nuclear accumulation.
Figure 4Induction of NKD1 and FZD3 in cultured cells. (A) Lithium chloride induction of NKD1 mRNA in FHs74Int cells. Confluent cells were treated with lithium chloride and sampled over a 16-h time course. Expression of FZD3 and NKD1 was measured by real-time RT–PCR and the level relative to untreated control cells determined. The inset panel shows qualitative RT–PCR analysis of the induced cells at 0 and 16 h. (B) Wnt3a induction of NKD1 and FZD3 mRNA in HeLa cells. Confluent cells were treated with Wnt3a-conditioned medium and sampled over a 17-h time course. Expression of NKD1 and FZD3 was measured by real-time RT–PCR and the level relative to untreated control cells determined.
Figure 5Real-time RT–PCR analysis of NKD1 and FZD3 expression in colorectal cancers. Relative expression of NKD1 (open bars) and FZD3 (filled bars) was determined in a series of colorectal cancers by comparison to matched normal samples, using real-time RT–PCR as described in the text. Samples were ordered by NKD1 levels for comparison between the two series.