Literature DB >> 18413808

Molecular analysis of metaplastic breast carcinoma: high EGFR copy number via aneusomy.

Judith A Gilbert1, Matthew P Goetz, Carol A Reynolds, James N Ingle, Karin F Giordano, Vera J Suman, Hilary E Blair, Robert B Jenkins, Wilma L Lingle, Monica M Reinholz, Alex A Adjei, Matthew M Ames.   

Abstract

Metaplastic breast carcinoma, a rare tumor composed of adenocarcinomatous and nonglandular growth patterns, is characterized by a propensity for distant metastases and resistance to standard anticancer therapies. We sought confirmation that this tumor is a basal-like breast cancer, expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and stem cell factor receptor (KIT). EGFR activating mutations and high copy number (associated with response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib) and KIT activating mutations (associated with imatinib sensitivity) were then investigated. Seventy-seven metaplastic cases were identified (1976-2006); 38 with tumor blocks available underwent pathologic confirmation before EGFR and KIT immunohistochemical analyses. A tissue microarray of malignant glandular and metaplastic elements was constructed and analyzed immunohistochemically for cytokeratin 5/6, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and p63, and by fluorescence in situ hybridization for EGFR and HER-2/neu. DNA isolated from individual elements was assessed for EGFR and KIT activating mutations. All assessable cases were negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and (except one) HER2. The majority were positive for cytokeratin 5/6 (58%), p63 (59%), and EGFR overexpression (66%); 24% were KIT positive. No EGFR or KIT activating mutations were present; 26% of the primary metaplastic breast carcinomas were fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive, displaying high EGFR copy number secondary to aneusomy (22%) and amplification (4%). We report here that metaplastic breast carcinoma is a basal-like breast cancer lacking EGFR and KIT activating mutations but exhibiting high EGFR copy number (primarily via aneusomy), suggesting that EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be evaluated in this molecular subset of breast carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18413808      PMCID: PMC2745608          DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  32 in total

1.  Optimization of patient selection for gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer by combined analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, K-ras mutation, and Akt phosphorylation.

Authors:  Sae-Won Han; Tae-You Kim; Yoon Kyung Jeon; Pil Gyu Hwang; Seock-Ah Im; Kyung-Hun Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Dong-Wan Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Noe Kyeong Kim; Doo Hyun Chung; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Unraveling the mystery of prognostic and predictive factors in epidermal growth factor receptor therapy.

Authors:  Frances A Shepherd; Ming-Sound Tsao
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Chad A Livasy; Gamze Karaca; Rita Nanda; Maria S Tretiakova; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dominic T Moore; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Activating mutations in c-KIT and PDGFRalpha are exclusively found in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and not in other tumors overexpressing these imatinib mesylate target genes.

Authors:  Herman Burger; Michael A den Bakker; Johan M Kros; Hans van Tol; Alex M de Bruin; Wolter Oosterhuis; Harry F G M van den Ingh; Erwin van der Harst; Hans P de Schipper; Erik A C Wiemer; Kees Nooter
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Prospective study of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive/phospho-Akt-positive or never smoker patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the ONCOBELL trial.

Authors:  Federico Cappuzzo; Claudia Ligorio; Pasi A Jänne; Luca Toschi; Elisa Rossi; Rocco Trisolini; Daniela Paioli; Alison J Holmes; Elisabetta Magrini; Giovanna Finocchiaro; Stefania Bartolini; Alessandra Cancellieri; Fortunato Ciardiello; Marco Patelli; Lucio Crino; Marileila Varella-Garcia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; George D Demetri; Charles D Blanke; Margaret von Mehren; Heikki Joensuu; Laura S McGreevey; Chang-Jie Chen; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Brian J Druker; Beate Kiese; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Samuel Singer; Christopher D M Fletcher; Sandra Silberman; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Jonathan A Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  EGFR amplification and lack of activating mutations in metaplastic breast carcinomas.

Authors:  J S Reis-Filho; C Pinheiro; M B K Lambros; F Milanezi; S Carvalho; K Savage; P T Simpson; C Jones; S Swift; A Mackay; R M Reis; J L Hornick; E M Pereira; F Baltazar; C D M Fletcher; A Ashworth; S R Lakhani; F C Schmitt
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Metaplastic breast carcinomas exhibit EGFR, but not HER2, gene amplification and overexpression: immunohistochemical and chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis.

Authors:  Jorge S Reis-Filho; Fernanda Milanezi; Silvia Carvalho; Pete T Simpson; Dawn Steele; Kay Savage; Maryou B K Lambros; Emilio M Pereira; Jahn M Nesland; Sunil R Lakhani; Fernando C Schmitt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like tumours.

Authors:  J S Reis-Filho; F Milanezi; D Steele; K Savage; P T Simpson; J M Nesland; E M Pereira; S R Lakhani; F C Schmitt
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.087

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Histological types of breast cancer: how special are they?

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Felipe C Geyer; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Hyung Seok Park; Seho Park; Joo Hee Kim; Ju-Hyun Lee; So-Young Choi; Byeong-Woo Park; Kyong-Sik Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Prognostic Evaluation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Genotype and Phenotype Parameters in Triple-negative Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Sofia Levva; Vassiliki Kotoula; Ioannis Kostopoulos; Kyriaki Manousou; Christos Papadimitriou; Kyriaki Papadopoulou; Sotiris Lakis; Kyriakos Koukoulias; Vasilios Karavasilis; George Pentheroudakis; Eufemia Balassi; Flora Zagouri; Ioannis G Kaklamanos; Dimitrios Pectasides; Evangelia Razis; Gerasimos Aravantinos; Pavlos Papakostas; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Grigorios Rallis; Helen Gogas; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.069

4.  The development of an integrated platform to identify breast cancer glycoproteome changes in human serum.

Authors:  Zhi Zeng; Marina Hincapie; Brian B Haab; Samir Hanash; Sharon J Pitteri; Steven Kluck; Jason M Hogan; Jacob Kennedy; William S Hancock
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.759

5.  Molecular markers for novel therapeutic strategies in pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Authors:  Judith A Gilbert; Laura J Adhikari; Ricardo V Lloyd; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Michael H Muders; Matthew M Ames
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 6.  Breast cancer classification and prognostication through diverse systems along with recent emerging findings in this respect; the dawn of new perspectives in the clinical applications.

Authors:  Vida Pourteimoor; Samira Mohammadi-Yeganeh; Mahdi Paryan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-09-20

Review 7.  Unraveling breast cancer heterogeneity through transcriptomic and epigenomic analysis.

Authors:  Frank A Orlando; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  [Genome-wide expression profiling as a clinical tool: are we there yet?].

Authors:  F C Geyer; T Decker; J S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 9.  Biomarkers in triple negative breast cancer: A review.

Authors:  Budhi S Yadav; Priyanka Chanana; Swaty Jhamb
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

10.  Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor vIII increases cell motility and clonogenecity in a prostate cell line RWPE1.

Authors:  M He; C Y F Young
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.