Literature DB >> 18410433

How long is too long? The effect of the duration of anaesthesia on the incidence of non-urological complications after surgery.

Jonathan C Routh1, Douglas R Bacon, Bradley C Leibovich, Horst Zincke, Michael L Blute, Igor Frank.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the duration of anaesthesia and non-urological complication (NUC) rates after surgery, as the increasing complexity of minimally invasive and laparoscopic procedures in urology has resulted in longer surgery and anaesthesia, and information on the effect of this on NUC rates is limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 2196 patients who had open radical nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery at our institution between 1989 and 2002. Patients were subdivided into groups I, II, and III according to the duration of general anaesthesia (<4, 4-6 and > or =6 h, respectively). NUCs after surgery, and mortality during and after surgery, were evaluated.
RESULTS: There were 1340, 723, and 133 patients in groups I, II and III, respectively. The incidences of any NUC were 3.1%, 5.8% and 13.5%, respectively. The odds ratios for the likelihood of a NUC were 1.91 (P = 0.004) and 4.84 (P < 0.001) for groups II and III, respectively. These differences remained significant even after adjusting for patient and tumour characteristics. Perioperative mortality was highest in group III, at 2.3%, vs 0.4% in groups I and II.
CONCLUSIONS: Longer anaesthesia is associated with an increase in the incidence of perioperative complications and mortality, especially when the duration of anaesthesia is >6 h. This increase appears to be independent of patient's preoperative health status, tumour extent and blood loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18410433     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  A call for HoLEP: AEEP for mega-prostates (≥ 200 cc).

Authors:  Nicholas E Boxall; Fanourios Georgiades; Saiful Miah; Laurian Dragos; James Armitage; Tevita F Aho
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jay Simhan; Marc C Smaldone; Kevin J Tsai; Daniel J Canter; Tianyu Li; Alexander Kutikov; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Robotics for Pelvic Reconstruction.

Authors:  Olga Ramm; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2011-06-30

4.  Comparison of glue versus suture mesh fixation for primary open inguinal hernia mesh repair by Lichtenstein technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaun Phoa; Kai Siang Chan; Sioh Huang Lim; Aung Myint Oo; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.920

5.  The Zhongshan score: a novel and simple anatomic classification system to predict perioperative outcomes of nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Lin Zhou; Jianming Guo; Hang Wang; Guomin Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Laser enucleation of the prostate in men with very large glands ≥175 ml: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mehmet Yilmaz; Mustafa Karaaslan; Halil Cagri Aybal; Maximilian Ferry von Bargen; Senol Tonyali; Tuncay Toprak; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-31

7.  Association of Anesthesia Duration With Complications After Microvascular Reconstruction of the Head and Neck.

Authors:  Jacob S Brady; Stuti V Desai; Meghan M Crippen; Jean Anderson Eloy; Yuriy Gubenko; Soly Baredes; Richard Chan Woo Park
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.