Literature DB >> 33978810

A call for HoLEP: AEEP for mega-prostates (≥ 200 cc).

Nicholas E Boxall1, Fanourios Georgiades1, Saiful Miah1, Laurian Dragos1, James Armitage1, Tevita F Aho2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficiency and efficacy of HoLEP, and methods of tissue retrieval, in patients with prostate volume (PV) ≥ 200 cc (Group 1) and to compare these to patients with PV 80-199 cc (Group 2).
METHODS: A database of all cases performed under the care of two surgeons at a tertiary HoLEP centre was reviewed.
RESULTS: 157 patients with PV ≥ 200 cc were compared to 157 of the most recent consecutive cases with PV 80-199 cc. Median (IQR) enucleation efficiency was greater in Group 1 [2.8 g/min (2.2-3.5)] than Group 2 [2.1 g/min (1.6-2.5), p < 0.001]. Morcellation efficiency did not differ significantly. Cystotomy was required for tissue retrieval in Group 1 only (5.7%). Decrease in serum haemoglobin (Hb) was greater in Group 1 (19 g/l (30-8) vs 12 (18-3.5), p < 0.001) with a transfusion rate of 4.5% vs 1.3%, respectively (p = 0.104). Length of stay was longer in Group 1 than Group 2 (1 day (1-2) vs 1 (1-1), p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in: time to and success of first trial without catheter, pre- and post-operative IPSS, Qmax and PVR, and 3 month catheter-free and urinary incontinence rates.
CONCLUSION: HoLEP outcomes are largely PV-independent even when PV is ≥ 200 cc, although length of stay and reduction in Hb are greater in this group. Alternatives to pure morcellation, such as cystotomy and resection of nodules, are more likely to be necessary with PV ≥ 200 cc.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AEEP; BPH; HoLEP; Supersize prostate;  > 200 cc prostate

Year:  2021        PMID: 33978810     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03708-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  17 in total

1.  Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size.

Authors:  Esequiel Rodriguez; Douglas Skarecky; Navneet Narula; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  'Case of the Month' from Cambridge University, UK: managing intractable bleeding from a 375 cc prostate in an anti-coagulated patient.

Authors:  Tevita Aho; Samih Al-Hayek; Andrew Winterbottom; Brendan Koo; Anne Warren
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Comparison of the Efficacy of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Treating Prostate Volumes of ≤80 and > 80 mL.

Authors:  Eymen Gazel; Engin Kaya; Serdar Yalcin; Halil Çagri Aybal; Tahsin Batuhan Aydogan; Lutfi Tunc
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results.

Authors:  M R Fraundorfer; P J Gilling
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Richard Naspro; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Salonia; Vincenzo Scattoni; Giorgio Guazzoni; Renzo Colombo; Andrea Cestari; Alberto Briganti; Bruno Mazzoccoli; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) and photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP) for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and chronic urinary retention.

Authors:  Christopher D Jaeger; Christopher R Mitchell; Lance A Mynderse; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate compared with transvesical open prostatectomy: 18-month follow-up of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Rainer M Kuntz; Karin Lehrich; Sascha Ahyai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Influence of prostate size on the outcome of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Hiren S Sodha; Shabbir J Kharodawala; Amit A Khandkar; Sunil S Hegde; Manish B Bansal
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates larger than 175 grams.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Shelly E Handa; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for very large benign prostatic hyperplasia (≥ 200 cc).

Authors:  Michael A Zell; Haidar Abdul-Muhsin; Anojan Navaratnam; Jameson Cumsky; Marlene Girardo; Joseph Cornella; Amihay Nevo; Scott Cheney; Mitchell R Humphreys
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Laser enucleation of the prostate in men with very large glands ≥175 ml: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mehmet Yilmaz; Mustafa Karaaslan; Halil Cagri Aybal; Maximilian Ferry von Bargen; Senol Tonyali; Tuncay Toprak; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-31

2.  TURPxit or not: contemporary management options for benign prostatic obstruction.

Authors:  Thomas R W Herrmann; Vincent Misrai; Fernando Gómez Sancha; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.