Literature DB >> 18410323

Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in delaying the institutionalization of patients with dementia: a meta-analysis.

Anouk Spijker1, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Emmelyne Vasse, Eddy Adang, Hub Wollersheim, Richard Grol, Frans Verhey.   

Abstract

Contemporary healthcare policies are designed to shape the conditions that can help delay the institutionalization of patients with dementia. This can be done by developing support programs that minimize healthcare risks for the patients with dementia and their informal caregivers. Many support programs have been developed, and some of them are effective, but there has been no systematic review with a meta-analysis of all types of nonpharmacological support programs with odds of institutionalization or time to institutionalization as an outcome measure. A systematic review with a meta-analysis was therefore conducted to estimate the overall effectiveness of nonpharmacological support programs for caregivers and patients with dementia that are intended to delay institutionalization. Thirteen support programs with a total of 9,043 patients were included in the meta-analyses. The estimated overall effectiveness suggests that these programs significantly decrease the odds of institutionalization (odds ratio (OR)=0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.43-0.99, P=.05) and significantly increase the time to institutionalization (standardized mean difference (SMD)=1.44, 95% CI=0.07-2.81, P=.04). A meta-analysis of the best-quality studies still showed a positive significant result for the odds of institutionalization (OR=0.60, 95% CI=0.43-0.85, P=.004), although the time to institutionalization was no longer significant (SMD=1.55, 95% CI=-0.35- 3.45, P=.11). The analysis of the intervention characteristics showed that actively involving caregivers in making choices about treatments distinguishes effective from ineffective support programs. Further investigation should be directed toward calculating the potential efficiency of these support programs by applying net-benefit or cost-effectiveness analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18410323     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01705.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  50 in total

1.  Classification models for early identification of persons at risk for dementia in primary care: an evaluation in a sample aged 80 years and older.

Authors:  Tessa N van den Kommer; Daniel E Bontempo; Hannie C Comijs; Scott M Hofer; Miranda G Dik; Andrea M Piccinin; Cees Jonker; Dorly J H Deeg; Boo Johansson
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.959

Review 2.  Care of community-dwelling older adults with dementia and their caregivers.

Authors:  Natalie Warrick; Jeanette C Prorok; Dallas Seitz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia.

Authors:  Siobhan Reilly; Claudia Miranda-Castillo; Reem Malouf; Juanita Hoe; Sandeep Toot; David Challis; Martin Orrell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-05

4.  Errors in self-reports of health services use: impact on alzheimer disease clinical trial designs.

Authors:  Christopher M Callahan; Wanzhu Tu; Timothy E Stump; Daniel O Clark; Kathleen T Unroe; Hugh C Hendrie
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

5.  A multidimensional home-based care coordination intervention for elders with memory disorders: the maximizing independence at home (MIND) pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Quincy M Samus; Deirdre Johnston; Betty S Black; Edward Hess; Christopher Lyman; Amrita Vavilikolanu; Jane Pollutra; Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos; Laura N Gitlin; Peter V Rabins; Constantine G Lyketsos
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 6.  Packages of care for dementia in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Martin J Prince; Daisy Acosta; Erico Castro-Costa; Jim Jackson; K S Shaji
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Measuring dementia carers' unmet need for services--an exploratory mixed method study.

Authors:  Christine Stirling; Sharon Andrews; Toby Croft; James Vickers; Paul Turner; Andrew Robinson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Dementia care initiative in primary practice: study protocol of a cluster randomized trial on dementia management in a general practice setting.

Authors:  Rolf Holle; Elmar Grässel; Stefan Ruckdäschel; Sonja Wunder; Hilmar Mehlig; Peter Marx; Olaf Pirk; Martin Butzlaff; Simone Kunz; Jörg Lauterberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Systematic care for caregivers of people with dementia in the ambulatory mental health service: designing a multicentre, cluster, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Anouk Spijker; Frans Verhey; Maud Graff; Richard Grol; Eddy Adang; Hub Wollersheim; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  WHEDA study: effectiveness of occupational therapy at home for older people with dementia and their caregivers--the design of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial evaluating a Dutch programme in seven German centres.

Authors:  Sebastian Voigt-Radloff; Maud Graff; Rainer Leonhart; Katrin Schornstein; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen; Marcel Olde-Rikkert; Michael Huell
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.