Literature DB >> 18408936

Single-stage correction of imperforate anus with a rectourethral or a rectovestibula fistula by semi-posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.

Shan Zheng1, Xianmin Xiao, Yanlei Huang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical advantages of a single-stage correction of imperforate anus with a rectourethral or a rectovestibula fistula in neonates by a semi-posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). The medical records of 38 neonates (5 females and 33 males) who had imperforate anus with a rectourethral or a rectovestibula fistula were reviewed and analyzed in Children's Hospital of Fudan University between January 2004 and July 2007. All patients had an anorectal malformation but without obvious sacral dysplasia. The first group had a single-stage PSARP without a colostomy. All neonates were full-term without severe cardiac, renal anomalies or severe abdominal distension. The second group had a staged Peña procedure; the neonates were not suitable for a single-stage PSARP because of severe abdominal distention or cardiac, renal anomalies. A transverse colostomy was performed, followed 3-6 months later by the Peña procedure, and colostomy closure 2 months thereafter. The congenital anomalies, fetal age, birth weight, time and age of the definitive operation, complications, length of hospital stay, cost, and postoperative bowel movements were analyzed between these two groups. Among the 38 patients, 22 had a single-stage definitive operation and 16 had a staged pull-through procedure. There were significant differences in congenital anomalies between the two groups (P = 0.0314), but no statistically significant differences between the fetal ages, weight at birth, and time and age at the time of the definitive operation (P > 0.05). One patient in the first group had intestinal obstruction and intestinal perforation. For the second group, early complications were related to the colostomy. At after 3 years postoperatively, 9 patients in the first group and 12 patients in the second group were followed-up and all had positive voluntary bowel movements. There were no statistically significant differences in soiling and constipation grades between the two groups. The total length of hospital stay was 12.06 +/- 0.85 and 33.85 +/- 0.94 days and the cost was 10,681.1 +/- 1,759.5 and 27,355.9 +/- 1,952.0 RMB for the first and second groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the total length of hospital stay and cost between the two groups (P < 0.0001); however, there were no statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay and cost during the definitive operation between the two groups (P > 0.05). This retrospective study shows that it is feasible for correction of imperforate anus with a rectourethral or a rectovestibula fistula in neonates using a modified PSARP without a colostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18408936     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-008-2154-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  17 in total

Review 1.  Surgical methods for anorectal malformations from Rehbein to Peña--critical assessment of score systems and proposal for a new classification.

Authors:  A M Holschneider; N K Jesch; E Stragholz; W Pfrommer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.191

2.  Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus: three years' experience.

Authors:  Mario Lima; Stefano Tursini; Giovanni Ruggeri; Antonio Aquino; Tommaso Gargano; Lorenzo De Biagi; Abuajila Ahmed; Andrea Gentili
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus--a new technique.

Authors:  K E Georgeson; T H Inge; C T Albanese
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  One-stage correction of high imperforate anus in the male neonate.

Authors:  C T Albanese; R W Jennings; J B Lopoo; B J Bratton; M R Harrison
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications.

Authors:  A Peña; P A Devries
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty is superior to sacroperineal-sacroabdominoperineal pull-through: a long-term follow-up study in boys with high anorectal anomalies.

Authors:  R J Rintala; H G Lindahl
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations.

Authors:  Alexander Holschneider; John Hutson; Albert Peña; Elhamy Beket; Subir Chatterjee; Arnold Coran; Michael Davies; Keith Georgeson; Jay Grosfeld; Devendra Gupta; Naomi Iwai; Dieter Kluth; Giuseppe Martucciello; Samuel Moore; Risto Rintala; E Durham Smith; D V Sripathi; Douglas Stephens; Sudipta Sen; Benno Ure; Sabine Grasshoff; Thomas Boemers; Feilin Murphy; Yunus Söylet; Martin Dübbers; Marc Kunst
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty.

Authors:  P A deVries; A Peña
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Results after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: a new approach to high imperforate anus.

Authors:  J L Cahill; D L Christie
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Findings of pelvic musculature and efficacy of laparoscopic muscle stimulator in laparoscopy-assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus.

Authors:  T Iwanaka; M Arai; H Kawashima; S Kudou; J Fujishiro; A Matsui; S Imaizumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  Length of stay and cost analysis of neonates undergoing surgery at a tertiary neonatal unit in England.

Authors:  S Shetty; N Kennea; P Desai; S Giuliani; J Richards
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Controversy of Single versus Staged Management of Anorectal Malformations.

Authors:  Ajay Narayan Gangopadhyay; Vaibhav Pandey
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  The incidence of different forms of ileus following surgery for abdominal birth defects in infants: a systematic review with a meta-analysis method.

Authors:  Laurens D Eeftinck Schattenkerk; Gijsbert D Musters; David J Nijssen; Wouter J de Jonge; Ralph de Vries; L W Ernest van Heurn; Joep P M Derikx
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2021-08-17

4.  Fifteen years of experience in the treatment of anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Victoria Julià; Xavier Tarrado; Jordi Prat; Laura Saura; Albert Montaner; Montserrrat Castañón; Josep Maria Ribó
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Naomi Iwai; Shigehisa Fumino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted Anorectoplasty: A Single-center Experience.

Authors:  Rajamani Gurusamy; S Vijay Raj; Raghul Maniam; S R Regunandan
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.