Alan C Utter1, Marion E Hager. 1. Department of Health, Leisure, and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA. utterac@appstate.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (ULTRA) in assessing fat-free mass (FFM) in comparison with hydrostatic weighing (HW) and skinfolds (SK) in high school wrestlers in a hydrated state. METHODS: Body composition was determined by ULTRA, HW, and three-site SK in 70 high school wrestlers (mean +/- SD: age, 15.5 +/- 1.5; height, 1.60 +/- 0.08 m; body mass, 65.8 +/- 12.7 kg). For all methods, body density (Db) was converted to percent body fat (%BF) using the Brozek equation. Hydration state was quantified by evaluating urine specific gravity. RESULTS: There were no significant differences for estimated FFM between ULTRA (57.2 +/- 9.7 kg) and HW (57.0 +/- 9.9 kg); however, SK (54.9 +/- 8.8 kg) were significantly different from HW. The standard errors of estimate for FFM with HW as the reference method were 2.40 kg for ULTRA and 2.74 kg for SK. Significant correlations were found for FFM between HW and ULTRA (r = 0.97, P < 0.001) and between HW and SK (r = 0.96, P < 0.001). A systematic bias was found for SK, as the difference between SK and HW significantly correlated with the FFM average of the two methods (r = -0.38, P < 0.001). This systematic bias was not found for ULTRA (r = - 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ULTRA provides similar estimates of FFM when compared with HW in a heterogeneous high school wrestling population during a hydrated state. ULTRA should be considered as an alternative field-based method of estimating the FFM of high school wrestlers.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (ULTRA) in assessing fat-free mass (FFM) in comparison with hydrostatic weighing (HW) and skinfolds (SK) in high school wrestlers in a hydrated state. METHODS: Body composition was determined by ULTRA, HW, and three-site SK in 70 high school wrestlers (mean +/- SD: age, 15.5 +/- 1.5; height, 1.60 +/- 0.08 m; body mass, 65.8 +/- 12.7 kg). For all methods, body density (Db) was converted to percent body fat (%BF) using the Brozek equation. Hydration state was quantified by evaluating urine specific gravity. RESULTS: There were no significant differences for estimated FFM between ULTRA (57.2 +/- 9.7 kg) and HW (57.0 +/- 9.9 kg); however, SK (54.9 +/- 8.8 kg) were significantly different from HW. The standard errors of estimate for FFM with HW as the reference method were 2.40 kg for ULTRA and 2.74 kg for SK. Significant correlations were found for FFM between HW and ULTRA (r = 0.97, P < 0.001) and between HW and SK (r = 0.96, P < 0.001). A systematic bias was found for SK, as the difference between SK and HW significantly correlated with the FFM average of the two methods (r = -0.38, P < 0.001). This systematic bias was not found for ULTRA (r = - 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ULTRA provides similar estimates of FFM when compared with HW in a heterogeneous high school wrestling population during a hydrated state. ULTRA should be considered as an alternative field-based method of estimating the FFM of high school wrestlers.
Authors: Sergio Setsuo Maeda; Barbara Santarosa Emo Peters; Lígia Araújo Martini; Hannah Karen Moreira Antunes; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Henrique Pierotti Arantes; Carla M Prado; Camila Lemos Pinto; Iana Mizumukai de Araújo; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Joao Lindolfo Cunha Borges; Ben-Hur Albergaria; Marcela Ushida; Guilherme Cardenaz de Souza; Laura Maria Carvalho de Mendonça; Mirley do Prado; Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro Journal: Adv Rheumatol Date: 2022-03-20
Authors: Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Sarah N Fultz; Malia N Melvin; Hailee L Wingfield; Mary N Woessner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carla Pérez-Chirinos Buxadé; Toni Solà-Perez; Jorge Castizo-Olier; Marta Carrasco-Marginet; Alex Roy; Michael Marfell-Jones; Alfredo Irurtia Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrew P Koutnik; Michelle E Favre; Karina Noboa; Marcos A Sanchez-Gonzalez; Sara E Moss; Bishoy Goubran; Csilla Ari; Angela M Poff; Chris Q Rogers; Janine M DeBlasi; Bishoy Samy; Mark Moussa; Jorge M Serrador; Dominic P D'Agostino Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Catheeja Ismail; Johannah Zabal; Haniel J Hernandez; Paula Woletz; Heather Manning; Carla Teixeira; Loretta DiPietro; Marc R Blackman; Michael O Harris-Love Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 4.566