Literature DB >> 18406948

QA issues for computer-controlled treatment delivery: this is not your old R/V system any more!

Benedick A Fraass1.   

Abstract

State-of-the-art radiotherapy treatment delivery has changed dramatically during the past decade, moving from manual individual field setup and treatment to automated computer-controlled delivery of complex treatments, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy and other similarly complex delivery strategies. However, the quality assurance methods typically used to ensure treatment is performed precisely and correctly have not evolved in a similarly dramatic way. This paper reviews the old manual treatment process and use of record-and-verify systems, and describes differences with modern computer-controlled treatment delivery. The process and technology used for computer-controlled treatment delivery are analyzed in terms of potential (and actual) problems, as well as relevant published guidance on quality assurance. The potential for improved quality assurance for computer-controlled delivery is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18406948      PMCID: PMC2851166          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  28 in total

Review 1.  Optimization and clinical use of multisegment intensity-modulated radiation therapy for high-dose conformal therapy.

Authors:  B A Fraass; M L Kessler; D L McShan; L H Marsh; B A Watson; W J Dusseau; A Eisbruch; H M Sandler; A S Lichter
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 2.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Facilitation of radiotherapeutic error by computerized record and verify systems.

Authors:  Gregory A Patton; David K Gaffney; John H Moeller
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Use of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for multileaf collimator quality control and calibration.

Authors:  S J K Baker; G J Budgell; R I MacKay
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Error in the delivery of radiation therapy: results of a quality assurance review.

Authors:  Grace Huang; Gaylene Medlam; Justin Lee; Susan Billingsley; Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Jolie Ringash; Gabrielle Kane; David C Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Error rates in clinical radiotherapy.

Authors:  R M Macklis; T Meier; M S Weinhous
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A programmable calculator to acquire, verify and record radiation treatment parameters from a linear acceleration.

Authors:  H Perry; J Mantel; M M Lefkofsky
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Accuracy in radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  P K Kartha; A Chung-Bin; T Wachtor; F R Hendrickson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Conformation radiotherapy. Rotation techniques as applied to radiography and radiotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  S Takahashi
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1965

10.  A computer-controlled conformal radiotherapy system. IV: Electronic chart.

Authors:  B A Fraass; D L McShan; G M Matrone; T A Weaver; J D Lewis; M L Kessler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Automated Verification of IGRT-based Patient Positioning.

Authors:  Xiaojun Jiang; Tim Fox; James S Cordova; Eduard Schreibmann
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.