Literature DB >> 18406935

Quality assurance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography for radiation therapy.

Lei Xing1.   

Abstract

Recent advances in radiation delivery techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, provide unprecedented ability to exquisitely control three-dimensional dose distribution. Development of on-board imaging and other image-guidance methods significantly improved our ability to better target a radiation beam to the tumor volume. However, in reality, accurate definition of the location and boundary of the tumor target is still problematic. Biologic and physiologic imaging promises to solve the problem in a fundamental way and has a more and more important role in patient staging, treatment planning, and therapeutic assessment in radiation therapy clinics. The last decade witnessed a dramatic increase in the use of positron emission tomography and computed tomography in radiotherapy practice. To ensure safe and effective use of nuclide imaging, a rigorous quality assurance (QA) protocol of the imaging tools and integration of the imaging data must be in place. The application of nuclide imaging in radiation oncology occurs at different levels of sophistication. Quantitative use of the imaging data in treatment planning through image registration and standardized uptake value calculation is often involved. Thus, QA should not be limited to the performance of the scanner, but should also include the process of implementing image data in treatment planning, such as data transfer, image registration, and quantitation of data for delineation of tumors and sensitive structures. This presentation discusses various aspects of nuclide imaging as applied to radiotherapy and describes the QA procedures necessary for the success of biologic image-guided radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18406935      PMCID: PMC2600917          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  34 in total

1.  Model-based image reconstruction for four-dimensional PET.

Authors:  Tianfang Li; Brian Thorndyke; Eduard Schreibmann; Yong Yang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Oral contrast medium in PET/CT: should you or shouldn't you?

Authors:  Ashley M Groves; Irfan Kayani; John C Dickson; Caroline Townsend; Ian Croasdale; Rizwan Syed; Nagesh Nagabushan; Sharon F Hain; Peter J Ell; Jamshed B Bomanji
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Validated image fusion of dedicated PET and CT for external beam radiation and therapy in the head and neck area.

Authors:  W V Vogel; D A X Schinagl; J A Van Dalen; J H A M Kaanders; W J G Oyen
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.346

4.  F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography staging in radical radiotherapy candidates with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: powerful correlation with survival and high impact on treatment.

Authors:  M P Mac Manus; R J Hicks; D L Ball; V Kalff; J P Matthews; E Salminen; P Khaw; A Wirth; D Rischin; A McKenzie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Target volume definition for 18F-FDG PET-positive lymph nodes in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ursula Nestle; Andrea Schaefer-Schuler; Stephanie Kremp; Andreas Groeschel; Dirk Hellwig; Christian Rübe; Carl-Martin Kirsch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  (18)F-FDG PET provides high-impact and powerful prognostic stratification in staging newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R J Hicks; V Kalff; M P MacManus; R E Ware; A Hogg; A F McKenzie; J P Matthews; D L Ball
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients.

Authors:  A K Berthelsen; S Holm; A Loft; T L Klausen; F Andersen; L Højgaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Image-based dose planning of intracavitary brachytherapy: registration of serial-imaging studies using deformable anatomic templates.

Authors:  G E Christensen; B Carlson; K S Chao; P Yin; P W Grigsby; K Nguyen; J F Dempsey; F A Lerma; K T Bae; M W Vannier; J F Williamson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Development of (18)F-fluoroethylcholine for cancer imaging with PET: synthesis, biochemistry, and prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Toshihiko Hara; Noboru Kosaka; Hiroichi Kishi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography: protocol issues and options.

Authors:  Todd M Blodgett; Barry M McCook; Michael P Federle
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.446

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Image-based biomarkers in clinical practice.

Authors:  John E Bayouth; Thomas L Casavant; Michael M Graham; Milan Sonka; Manickam Muruganandham; John M Buatti
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Jonathan J Wyatt; Hazel M McCallum; Ross J Maxwell
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.