Literature DB >> 18406064

Task-dependent encoding of space and events by striatal neurons is dependent on neural subtype.

N C Schmitzer-Torbert1, A D Redish.   

Abstract

The dorsal striatum plays a critical role in procedural learning and memory. Current models of basal ganglia assume that striatal neurons and circuitry are critical for the execution of overlearned, habitual sequences of action. However, less is known about how the striatum encodes task information that guides the performance of actions in procedural tasks. To explore the striatal encoding of task information, we compared the behavioral correlates of striatal neurons tested in two tasks: a multiple T-maze task in which reward delivery was entirely predictable based on spatial cues (the Multiple-T task), and a task in which rats ran on a rectangular track, but food delivery depended on the distance traveled on the track and was not dependent solely on spatial location (the Take-5 task). Striatal cells recorded on these tasks were divisible into three cell types: phasic-firing neurons (PFNs), tonically firing neurons (TFNs), and high-firing neurons (HFNs) and similar proportions of each cell type were found in each task. However, the behavioral correlates of each cell type were differentially sensitive to the type of task rats were performing. PFNs were responsive to specific task-parameters on each task. TFNs showed reliable burst-and-pause responses following food delivery and other events that were consistent with tonically active neurons (TANs) on the Take-5 (non-spatial) task but not on the Multiple-T (spatial) task. HFNs showed spatial oscillations on the Multiple-T (spatial) task but not the Take-5 (non-spatial) task. Reconstruction of the rats' position on the maze was highly accurate when using striatal ensembles recorded on the Multiple-T (spatial) task, but not when using ensembles recorded on the Take-5 (non-spatial) task. In contrast, reconstruction of time following food delivery was successful in both tasks. The results indicated a strong task dependency of the quality of the spatial, but not the reward-related, striatal representations on these tasks. These results suggest that striatal spatial representations depend on the degree to which spatial task-parameters can be unambiguously associated with goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18406064      PMCID: PMC4206194          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  52 in total

1.  Dorsal striatal head direction and hippocampal place representations during spatial navigation.

Authors:  K E Ragozzino; S Leutgeb; S J Mizumori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  What are the computations of the cerebellum, the basal ganglia and the cerebral cortex?

Authors:  K Doya
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1999-10

3.  Activity of striatal neurons reflects dynamic encoding and recoding of procedural memories.

Authors:  Terra D Barnes; Yasuo Kubota; Dan Hu; Dezhe Z Jin; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Functional differences between macaque prefrontal cortex and caudate nucleus during eye movements with and without reward.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kobayashi; Reiko Kawagoe; Yoriko Takikawa; Masashi Koizumi; Masamichi Sakagami; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Physiological properties of projection neurons in the monkey striatum to the globus pallidus.

Authors:  M Kimura; M Kato; H Shimazaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of reward expectation on behavior-related neuronal activity in primate striatum.

Authors:  J R Hollerman; L Tremblay; W Schultz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Building action repertoires: memory and learning functions of the basal ganglia.

Authors:  A M Graybiel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of tonically active neurons of the primate's striatum.

Authors:  T Aosaki; M Kimura; A M Graybiel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Tonically discharging putamen neurons exhibit set-dependent responses.

Authors:  M Kimura; J Rajkowski; E Evarts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Quantitative measures of cluster quality for use in extracellular recordings.

Authors:  N Schmitzer-Torbert; J Jackson; D Henze; K Harris; A D Redish
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  50 in total

1.  Striatal versus hippocampal representations during win-stay maze performance.

Authors:  Joshua D Berke; Jason T Breck; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stable encoding of task structure coexists with flexible coding of task events in sensorimotor striatum.

Authors:  Yasuo Kubota; Jun Liu; Dan Hu; William E DeCoteau; Uri T Eden; Anne C Smith; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Corticostriatal Interactions during Learning, Memory Processing, and Decision Making.

Authors:  Cyriel M A Pennartz; Joshua D Berke; Ann M Graybiel; Rutsuko Ito; Carien S Lansink; Matthijs van der Meer; A David Redish; Kyle S Smith; Pieter Voorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Advance cueing produces enhanced action-boundary patterns of spike activity in the sensorimotor striatum.

Authors:  Terra D Barnes; Jian-Bin Mao; Dan Hu; Yasuo Kubota; Anna A Dreyer; Catherine Stamoulis; Emery N Brown; Ann M Graybiel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Repeated whisker stimulation evokes invariant neuronal responses in the dorsolateral striatum of anesthetized rats: a potential correlate of sensorimotor habits.

Authors:  Todd M Mowery; Jon B Harrold; Kevin D Alloway
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Changes in reward contingency modulate the trial-to-trial variability of hippocampal place cells.

Authors:  Andrew M Wikenheiser; A David Redish
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Hippocampus and subregions of the dorsal striatum respond differently to a behavioral strategy change on a spatial navigation task.

Authors:  Paul S Regier; Seiichiro Amemiya; A David Redish
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Parvalbumin Interneurons Modulate Striatal Output and Enhance Performance during Associative Learning.

Authors:  Kwang Lee; Sandra M Holley; Justin L Shobe; Natalie C Chong; Carlos Cepeda; Michael S Levine; Sotiris C Masmanidis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Cocaine Place Conditioning Strengthens Location-Specific Hippocampal Coupling to the Nucleus Accumbens.

Authors:  Lucas Sjulson; Adrien Peyrache; Andrea Cumpelik; Daniela Cassataro; György Buzsáki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Neural correlates of stimulus-response and response-outcome associations in dorsolateral versus dorsomedial striatum.

Authors:  Thomas A Stalnaker; Gwendolyn G Calhoon; Masaaki Ogawa; Matthew R Roesch; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.