Literature DB >> 18402736

Laparoscopic-assisted transgastric endoscopy: current indications and future implications.

Kurt E Roberts1, Lucian Panait, Andrew J Duffy, Priya A Jamidar, Robert L Bell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic access to the proximal gastrointestinal tract may prove difficult for a variety of anatomic reasons. Under laparoscopic visualization, trocars can be placed into the stomach with the subsequent introduction of a flexible endoscope directly into the body of the stomach. The purpose of this study was to describe this technique and demonstrate that it is safe, effective, and feasible.
METHODS: Six patients with altered proximal foregut anatomy were examined. Five patients had previously undergone laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass, and one patient had severe distal esophageal stenosis precluding distal passage of an endoscope. All patients required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and one patient underwent closure of a symptomatic gastrogastric fistula. In each patient, two 5-mm ports were inserted and tacking sutures placed between the gastric body and the anterior abdominal wall. Subsequently, a flexible endoscope was inserted into the stomach through a gastrotomy under direct visualization. Picture-in-picture technology enabled simultaneous monitoring of the laparoscopic and endoscopic field.
RESULTS: The operative time ranged from 64 minutes to 93 minutes. All therapeutic endoscopic procedures were successful. The anterior gastrotomies were either closed primarily or a feeding tube was placed. Patients reported minimal postoperative pain. No complications resulted from the procedures.
CONCLUSION: In an age where surgeons and gastroenterologists are focusing on the stomach as an access point for transgastric endoscopic surgery, we view the stomach as a portal into the gastrointestinal tract. In patients with limited access for traditional endoluminal therapy, laparoscopic-assisted transgastric endoscopy can be performed safely and efficiently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18402736      PMCID: PMC3016032     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


INTRODUCTION

Although endoscopic visualization of body cavities dates back to the time of the Roman Empire, the first gastric endoscopy was performed in 1868 by Adolph Kussmaul via a rigid open tube.[1] Subsequent modifications in instrumentation by Elsner, Schindler, and Hirschovitz led to the creation of modern-day endoscopes.[2,3] Almost all advanced diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of today, including variceal banding, management of peptic ulcer disease, biliary tract manipulation, and even transgastric exploration via natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), require normal anatomy and unobstructed access through the transoral route. However, access difficulties emerge when patients have altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to esophageal obstruction or altered anatomy following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or Billroth II surgery. Methods of alternate access routes with variable degrees of success in resolving the patients' medical condition have been described in the literature. Percutaneous, ultrasound, and CT-guided transcatheter access to the gastric remnant, performed with injection of contrast, have been completed in patients after gastric bypass.[4,5] However, these are only diagnostic techniques that offer no concomitant opportunity for therapeutic intervention. Retrograde enteroscopy is the only endoscopic procedure for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. The duodenum or stomach remnant can be visualized with a long endoscope passed via the gastric pouch into the Roux limb or the afferent Billroth II limb. This procedure is technically difficult, especially in patients with a long limb of excluded small bowel. With altered foregut anatomy, the success rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is well below 70%.[6,7] Until recently, open surgery was the only available method for access to the biliary tree or stomach in this select group of patients. Not surprisingly, the associated morbidity, cost, and length of hospitalization make this an unattractive alternative. Minimally invasive access to the stomach with a laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy was first performed in 1991 for feeding purposes.[8-11] Similarly, the stomach remnant can be accessed in patients who underwent gastric bypass and require ERCP. [12-17] lists current published efforts with regards to laparoscopic-assisted, transgastric endoscopy. Using this approach, ERCP was first described in 2002 for management of a benign biliary stricture in a patient with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.[12] The authors accessed the stomach remnant through a 15-mm port in the left upper quadrant. A gastrotomy was performed with ultrasonic shears and a purse-string suture placed around it for traction. Subsequently, Ceppa et al[13] performed successful transgastric endoscopy, or ERCP, or both, in 9 of 10 patients studied, and Nguyen et al[14] have described a similar technique. Variations of this technique use alternative means of accessing the gastric remnant. Martinez et al[15] initially placed a gastrostomy tube utilizing CT-scan guidance and fluoroscopy. The authors subsequently dilated the gastrostomy tract to allow passage of the endoscope a few weeks after the original procedure. Using this technique, successful endoscopy or ERCP was achieved in 6 patients. Laparoscopic gastrostomy has also been described. In this technique, the edges of the gastrostomy are sutured to the anterior abdominal wall fascia, which allows for immediate passage of an endoscope. After completion of the ERCP, a gastrostomy tube is left in place for future access to the stomach remnant should that be necessary.[16] Finally, we have previously described the transgastric approach for closure of a gastrogastric fistula after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In this scenario, 2 gastrostomies were created in the remnant stomach under direct laparoscopic visualization. The gastrogastric fistula was then closed primarily with several figure-of-eight sutures placed with the aid of an Endo Stitch (Autosuture, Norwalk, CT).[17] Literature Reports on the Use of Laparoscopic Assisted Transgastric Endoscopy ERCP = endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; LUQ = left upper quadrant; GI = gastrointestinal; SMA = superior mesenteric artery.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of the patients who required laparoscopic-assisted, transgastric endoscopy at a single institution. Six such patients were identified, and the indications for the procedure are summarized in . Characteristics of Patients Who Underwent Laparoscopic-Assisted, Transgastric Endoscopy ERCP = endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, LOA = lysis of adhesions, LUQ = left upper quadrant. Although subtle variations existed from case to case, the following steps are highlighted: (1) Port placement: Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum is induced with a Veress needle to achieve a peritoneal pressure of 15 mm Hg. Afterwards, a 5-mm trocar is introduced in the right upper quadrant. Additional trocars are placed at the umbilical level (12 mm), left lower quadrant (5 mm), and left upper quadrant (12 mm) (. Laparoscopic port placement. (2) Gastrotomy: After visualization of the gastric remnant, a site is chosen on the greater curvature for the gastrotomy. Four #0 Ticron sutures (Autosuture, Norwalk, CT) are placed in a diamond-shaped configuration on the gastric corpus, with the center of the diamond being the future site of the gastrotomy (. A Veress needle and VersaStep sleeve (Autosuture, Norwalk, CT) are introduced through the left-upper quadrant-12-mm incision into the gastric corpus, in the center of the 4 previously placed sutures. Adequate traction and countertraction are placed on the 4 sutures to allow accurate insertion of the Veress needle into the stomach. The Veress needle is subsequently withdrawn, and a 12-mm port is inserted through the previously placed sleeve to dilate the subcutaneous tract and the gastrotomy. The trocar and sleeve are subsequently removed. Stomach is being pulled up to the anterior abdominal wall. (3) ERCP: A sterile side viewing endoscope is inserted manually through the left-upper-quadrant-12-mm port site into the gastric fundus under direct laparoscopic visualization (. All of our patients required sphincterotomy. In 2 patients, the extraction of retained common bile duct stones was performed. Two other patients underwent Sphincter of Oddi manometry, which confirmed the preoperative diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Endoscope is being advanced into stomach. (4) Closure of gastrotomy: Upon completion of the ERCP, the gastrotomy is usually closed in 2 layers: the first layer is a running stitch of #0 Polysorb (Autosuture, Norwalk, CT) (. This layer is then imbricated using interrupted #0 Ticron sutures placed in a horizontal mattress fashion. Closure of gastrotomy. In one patient, a pancreaticoduodenal drain was passed through the gastrotomy wound outside of the abdominal cavity. This patient had the gastrotomy closed in a single layer with a figure-of-eight #0 Silk (Autosuture, Norwalk, CT). Gastropexy was subsequently performed to suspend the stomach to the anterior abdominal wall. This was achieved with four #1 Ticron sutures. Another patient had 2 gastrotomies in the gastric remnant for closure of a gastrogastric fistula. The gastrotomies were closed en masse using a linear stapler.

RESULTS

Six patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted, transgastric endoscopy. All patients were female, and the average age was 46 years. All patients required endoscopic evaluation of the biliary tree, but had altered gastrointestinal anatomy, which precluded performance of esogastroduodenoscopy via the standard route. Five patients had previously undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and one patient had a distal esophageal stricture secondary to tumor, which did not allow passage of the endoscope. Patient 1 was a 58-year-old female who was admitted for acute pancreatitis. She had a past medical history significant for a bone marrow transplant for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (5 years earlier). Her alkaline phosphatase level was elevated (1300), and abdominal ultrasound and CT scan revealed multiple gallstones. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed, and the intraoperative cholangiogram showed impacted stone at the ampulla of Vater. Intraoperative ERCP was attempted but was not possible due to previously undiagnosed esophageal stricture from graft versus host disease. Laparoscopic-assisted transgastric endoscopy was subsequently performed with successful ERCP, sphincterotomy, and extraction of stone. A feeding gastrostomy tube was placed through the gastrotomy wound at the end of the procedure. Patient 2 was a 35-year-old female who was evaluated for intermittent episodes of right upper quadrant abdominal pain. The patient had undergone cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 3 years earlier and had a documented gastrogastric fistula. Her preoperative liver function tests were elevated. Abdominal ultrasound and CT scan as well as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) revealed a dilated common bile duct (12 mm). The patient underwent ERCP, sphincterotomy, and transgastric closure of the gastrogastric fistula. Patient 3 was a 39-year-old female who presented with right upper quadrant abdominal pain. She had a past surgical history significant for cholecystectomy and Rouxen-Y gastric bypass (2 years prior). The patient had elevated alkaline phosphatase levels. Abdominal ultrasound and MRCP revealed common bile duct dilatation (12mm) and likely periampullary stricture. ERCP and sphincterotomy were performed, after which the gastrotomy was closed in 2 layers. Patient 4 was a 44-year-old female with a history of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic cholecystectomy who was admitted with chronic right upper quadrant abdominal pain. The pain was similar to her right upper quadrant pain before cholecystectomy. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction was suspected, and the patient underwent laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, transgastric ERCP, sphincterotomy, and sphincter of Oddi manometry. A pancreaticoduodenal drain was passed through the gastrotomy site and connected extracorporeally for gravity drainage. The gastrotomy was closed with a figure-of-eight suture around the drain and the stomach was anchored to the anterior abdominal wound. Patient 5 was a 60-year-old female with a history of Rouxen-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic cholecystectomy who was admitted for ascending cholangitis secondary to choledocholithiasis. The patient underwent laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, transgastric ERCP, sphincterotomy, and extraction of the retained stone. The gastrotomy wound was closed in 2 layers. Patient 6 was a 45-year-old female who was evaluated for chronic right upper quadrant pain. The patient had a history of open cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. With the suspected diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi sphincter dysfunction, the patient underwent laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, transgastric endoscopy, sphincterotomy, and sphincter of Oddi manometry. The gastrotomy wound was closed in 2 layers. The operative times ranged between 64 minutes to 93 minutes. The patients reported minimal postoperative pain, and no postoperative complications were encountered.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic-assisted, transgastric endoscopy was successfully performed in 6 patients with altered upper gastrointestinal tract anatomy. This technique was originally described in 2002,[12] but it was not until recently that it was adopted in clinical practice. In most of the case reports, the technique was used in patients who had previously undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. To our knowledge, this is the first description of the procedure in a patient with malignant esophageal stricture. Performing an upper endoscopy via the gastrostomy feeding tube site has been previously described in patients with benign esophageal strictures.[18-20] Several variations in the described technique are possible: the number of ports may be as few as 2, although we found 3 to be optimal. The placement of ports may also vary depending on the patient's anatomy and previous operations. In most cases, we attempted to place the ports through the previous healed laparoscopic incisions from the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Nevertheless, one large port (12 mm or 15 mm) needs to be placed in the left upper quadrant to allow easy mobilization of the gastric remnant and the creation of the future gastrotomy. The chosen site of the gastrotomy on the anterior gastric remnant wall is circumscribed by the placement of 3 sutures or 4 sutures in a triangular or diamond-shape configuration, which will aid in providing adequate retraction and exposure. In our series, variations also existed in the type of gastrotomy closure: the authors' preferred method is the double-layer technique, although single-layer and stapled closure were used in special circumstances, ie, when a pancreaticoduodenal drain was passed through the gastrotomy site and when 2 gastrotomies were performed in the gastric remnant, respectively. Additionally, a gastrostomy tube can be left in place should the patient need a tube for enteral feeds or if subsequent access to the gastric remnant is envisioned. The role of transgastric surgery may expand in the future. The described technique could easily be used to treat a Dieulafoy's lesion or bleeding peptic ulcer, resect a proximal lesser curve gastric tumor, or resect a benign duodenal tumor. In addition, transgastric surgery may be an adjunct to capsule endoscopy in the localization and treatment of occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Finally, this surgical technique could also be applicable as an immediate bridge to natural orifice surgery.

CONCLUSION

In an age where surgeons and gastroenterologists are focusing on the stomach as an access point out of the gastrointestinal tract and into the peritoneal cavity, we also view the stomach as a portal into the gastrointestinal tract. In the patient with limited access for traditional endoluminal therapy, laparoscopic-assisted, transgastric endoscopy can be performed safely and efficiently.
Table 1.

Literature Reports on the Use of Laparoscopic Assisted Transgastric Endoscopy

SourceYearNIndication*Access to the Stomach Remnant*ProcedureGastrotomy ClosureOutcome
Peters et al.[12]20021Benign biliary stricture15 mm trocar LUQERCPNot specifiedResolution of symptoms
Pimentel et al.[16]20041Ascending cholangitisLaparoscopic gastrostomyERCPGastrostomy tube left in placeResolution of symptoms
Martinez et al.[15]20066Papillary fibrosisHealed gastrostomy tract (previous gastrostomy tube placed under CT scan guidance)ERCP (n = 2)Not specifiedResolution of symptoms
Dilated gastric remnantAttempted ERCP (n = 1)
Evaluation of upper GI bleedingPrepyloric ulcer biopsy (n = 2)
Evaluation of prepyloric ulcerGastroscopy/Duodenoscopy (n = 6)
Melena and increased LFT's
Abdominal pain, vomiting, increased LFT's
Nguyen et al.[14]20071Choledocholithiasis15 mm trocar LUQERCPRunning suture, 2 layersResolution of symptoms
Ceppa et al.[13]200710Benign biliary stricture (n = 2)15 mm trocar LUQERCP (n = 4)Running suture or linear staplerResolution of symptoms (n = 6)
Choledocholithiasis (n = 3)Attempted ERCP (n = 1)Chemotherapy (n = 1)
GI bleeding (n = 3)Duodenal tumor biopsy (n = 1)Open repair of bleeding ulcer (n = 1)
Abdominal pain (n = 2)Gastroscopy/Duodenoscopy (n = 5)SMA syndrome (n = 1)
Roberts et al.[17]20071Gastrogastric fistula12 mm port LUQ, 5 mm trocar LUQERCP, intragastric closure of gastrogastric fistulaStapled closure of both gastrotomiesResolution of symptoms

ERCP = endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; LUQ = left upper quadrant; GI = gastrointestinal; SMA = superior mesenteric artery.

Table 2.

Characteristics of Patients Who Underwent Laparoscopic-Assisted, Transgastric Endoscopy

Altered Anatomy (number)Preoperative DiagnosisStomach Access*Procedure*Gastrotomy Closure
Esophageal stricture (1)Gallstone pancreatitis12 mm port LUQ, traction sutures placed on the stomach in triangular-shape configuration. Gastrotomy performed in the center of the triangle.ERCP, sphincterotomy, extraction of stone, feeding gastrostomy tubeFeeding gastrostomy tube
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (5)Ampullary stricture, gastrogastric fistula12 mm port LUQ, traction sutures placed on the stomach in triangular-shape configuration. Gastrotomy performed in the center of the triangle. 5 mm trocar LUQ for transgastric laparoscope.ERCP, sphincterotomy, endoscopic closure of gastrogastric fistulaStapled closure of both gastrotomies.
Periampullary stricture12 mm port LUQ, traction sutures placed on the stomach in triangular-shape configuration. Gastrotomy performed in the center of the triangle.ERCP, sphincterotomyTwo-layer suture closure
Oddi's dysfunction12 mm port LUQ, traction sutures placed on the stomach in diamond-shape configuration. Gastrotomy performed in the center of the diamond.LOA, ERCP, sphincterotomy, Oddi manometry, gastropexySingle-layer suture closure around a pancreatico-biliary drain. Stomach pexyed to the anterior abdominal wall.
Ascending cholangitis, choledocholithiasis12-mm port LUQ, traction sutures placed on the stomach in diamond-shape configuration. Gastrotomy performed in the center of the diamond.LOA, ERCP, sphincterotomy, extraction of stoneTwo-layer suture closure
Oddi's dysfunction12 mm port LUQ, traction sutures placed on the stomach in triangular-shape configuration. Gastrotomy performed in the center of the triangle.LOA, ERCP, sphincterotomy, Oddi manometryTwo-layer suture closure

ERCP = endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, LOA = lysis of adhesions, LUQ = left upper quadrant.

  20 in total

1.  Investigation of the excluded stomach after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  M Sundbom; R Nyman; H Hedenström; S Gustavsson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Wolf-Schindler gastroscope.

Authors:  Robert E Kravetz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, sphincterotomy, and gallstone extraction via gastrostomy.

Authors:  R Gray; S Leong; N Marcon; G Haber
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Laparoscopic Stamm gastrostomy with gastropexy.

Authors:  D S Reiner; I M Leitman; R J Ward
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Endoscopy and retrograde cholangiography via gastrostomy.

Authors:  L Schapira; D B Falkenstein; D S Zimmon
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Laparoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy.

Authors:  R W Shallman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Laparoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  D S Edelman; S W Unger
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991-11

8.  Laparoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  D S Edelman; S W Unger; D R Russin
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-12

9.  Retrograde endoscopy of the bypassed stomach segment after gastric bypass surgery: unexpected lesions.

Authors:  D R Sinar; E G Flickinger; H K Park; R R Sloss
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Radiologic assessment of the distal stomach and duodenum after gastric bypass: percutaneous CT-guided transcatheter technique.

Authors:  E P Barmeir; H Solomon; I Charuzi; M Hirsch
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1984
View more
  11 in total

1.  A laparoscopic transgastric approach to the treatment of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction postgastric bypass.

Authors:  Karen J Dickinson; Conrad G Beckett; John C May; James C Halstead
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-22

2.  Laparoscopy-assisted transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technical features.

Authors:  Enrico Facchiano; Giovanni Quartararo; Vittorio Pavoni; Gadiel Liscia; Riccardo Naspetti; Alessandro Sturiale; Marcello Lucchese
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Complications of laparoscopic transgastric ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Kevin L Grimes; Victor H Maciel; Wilmer Mata; Gabriel Arevalo; Kirpal Singh; Maurice E Arregui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP) following bariatric gastric bypass surgery: initial experience of a single UK centre.

Authors:  Bharat Paranandi; Deepak Joshi; Borzoueh Mohammadi; Andrew Jenkinson; Marco Adamo; Samantha Read; Gavin J Johnson; Michael H Chapman; Stephen P Pereira; George J Webster
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-14

5.  Laparoscopic transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after gastric bypass: case series and a description of technique.

Authors:  Peter M Bertin; Kirpal Singh; Maurice E Arregui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The Outcome of Laparoscopy-Assisted Transgastric Rendezvous ERCP During Cholecystectomy After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Compared to Normal Controls.

Authors:  Sofia Liljegard; Erik Haraldsson; Åsa Fredriksson; Tomas Manke; Anders Kylebäck; Per-Anders Larsson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 7.  Role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery of patients.

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma; Pietro Forestieri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Laparoscopic-assisted ERCP and EUS in patients with prior Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a dual-center case series experience.

Authors:  Erik Bowman; Jacob Greenberg; Michael Garren; Nalini Guda; Brian Rajca; Mark Benson; Patrick Pfau; Anurag Soni; Andrew Walker; Deepak Gopal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography post bariatric surgery: how to overcome the technical challenges.

Authors:  Avtar Sur; Hartej Sur; Muhammed A Khan
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-03-04

Review 10.  Endoluminal solutions to bariatric surgery complications: A review with a focus on technical aspects and results.

Authors:  Raquel Souto-Rodríguez; María-Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.