Literature DB >> 16865585

The effect of Nazism on medical progress in gastroenterology: the inefficiency of evil.

Mitchell S Cappell1.   

Abstract

While Nazism is almost universally recognized as a great evil, control of science and medicine by the totalitarian Nazi state might be viewed as increasing efficiency. Scientific methods are applied to semiquantitatively analyze the effects of Nazism on medical progress in gastroenterology to document its pernicious effects, and to honor outstanding gastroenterologists persecuted or murdered by the Nazis. This is a retrospective, quasi-case-controlled study. To disprove the null hypothesis that Nazism was efficient, retarded progress in gastroenterology is demonstrated by (1) enumerating the loss to Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944 due to violent death, incarceration, or forced exile of key researchers in gastroenterology, defined by authorship of at least one book or 10 articles in peer-reviewed journals or other outstanding scholarship; (2) demonstrating a statistically significantly greater loss in Nazi Germany than in non-Nazi (Weimar German Republic from 1921 to 1932) or anti-Nazi (democratic America from 1933 to 1944) control groups; and (3) demonstrating that each loss was directly due to Nazism (murder, incarceration, or exile due to documented threat of violence/death or revocation of medical license). Sources of error in analyzing events from 70 years ago are described. Nazi Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe gained 0 and lost 53 key gastroenterology researchers, including 32 lost due to forced exile, 11 murdered by the Nazis, 5 lost due to suicide under threat of violence, 3 in hiding from the Gestapo, and 2 for other reasons. Fifty-two of the gastroenterologists were persecuted solely because they were Jewish or of Jewish descent and one because he was a Christian anti-Nazi Polish patriot. Particularly severe losses occurred in endoscopy. The loss in Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1944 was significantly greater than that in non-Nazi Germany and Austria from 1921 to 1932 (53 versus 4; odds ratio = 25.27; 95% CI: 9.01-70.48; P < 0.0001) and was significantly greater than that in anti-Nazi America from 1933 to 1944 (53 versus 0; odds ratio > 104.0; 95% CI: 17.62-608.95; P < 0.0001). Lost physicians in Nazi Germany (with reasons for loss) included Ismar Boas, the father of modern gastroenterology (suicide after medical license revoked); Hans Popper, the father of hepatopathology (fled impending arrest); Rudolph Nissen, the father of antireflux surgery (fled after job dismissal); Rudolph Schindler, the father of semiflexible endoscopy (fled after incarceration); Heinrich Lamm, the first to experimentally demonstrate fiberoptic transmission and the first to suggest its applicability for gastroscopy (fled after medical license revoked); Hermann Strauss, a pioneer in rigid sigmoidoscopy (suicide in a concentration camp); A.A.H. van den Bergh, who discovered the van den Bergh reaction to differentiate indirect from direct bilirubin (died in hiding in Nazi-occupied Holland); and Kurt Isselbacher, subsequently the Chief of Gastroenterology at Harvard Medical School (fled in childhood after a grandfather murdered by Nazis). All four refugee physicians who were reexposed to Nazi domination, after a regime change in their country of refuge, fled again or committed suicide. The Nazi damage to German and Austrian gastroenterology was immense, e.g., 13 of 14 major international discoveries in diagnostic gastroscopy were made by Germans or Austrians before the Third Reich, versus only 1 of 8 subsequently (odds ratio = 91; 95% CI: 3.58-13,887.61; P < 0.001). Eighteen (34%) of the persecuted physicians immigrated to America, thereby contributing to the postwar flourishing of American gastroenterology, particularly gastrointestinal endoscopy. In conclusion, the Third Reich severely retarded and reversed medical progress in gastroenterology in Germany. The inefficiency of Nazism, as herein documented, is attributable to the Nazi commitment of so much human, economic, and social resources to the military to wage wars of aggression, to the secret police (Gestapo) to pursue and exterminate perceived internal enemies, and to the Party to control and regiment civil society. Most inefficient is the incarceration, exile, or murder of Germany's most trained physicians and talented researchers because of religion or race, sociological parameters that are irrelevant to productivity. Intimidation and repression stifle scientific scholarship and creativity. This work disproves the myth of the efficiency of Nazism, and like tyrannies, by the novel application of semiquantitative scientific methodology to assess causality in medical history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16865585     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-8023-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  65 in total

1.  Presentation of the Kober medal of the Association of American Physicians to Kurt J. Isselbacher, M.D.

Authors:  E Braunwald
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  The impact of German Jewish physicians and German medicine on the origins and development of the medical faculty of the Hebrew University.

Authors:  G Baader
Journal:  Korot       Date:  2001

3.  The decline of German medicine, 1933-45.

Authors:  J R Silver
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Edinb       Date:  2003

4.  [A simple operation for control of reflux esophagitis].

Authors:  R NISSEN
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1956-05-18

5.  The ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm of Albert Einstein.

Authors:  J R Cohen; L M Graver
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-05

6.  [Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Classen; L Demling
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1974-03-15       Impact factor: 0.628

7.  [Hermann Strauss on his 100th birthday anniversary].

Authors: 
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1968-11-15       Impact factor: 0.628

8.  Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report.

Authors:  W S McCune; P E Shorb; H Moscovitz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Colonoscopy with a VideoEndoscope: preliminary experience.

Authors:  M V Sivak; D E Fleischer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Silences: helping elderly Holocaust victims deal with the past.

Authors:  R Schindler; C Spiegel; E Malachi
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  1992
View more
  3 in total

1.  A more than one-hundred-fold higher per capita rate of authorship of five democratic nations versus their relatively undemocratic neighboring nations among 6,437 articles in 14 medical journals: does democracy and civil liberties promote intellectual creativity and medical research?

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Laparoscopic-assisted transgastric endoscopy: current indications and future implications.

Authors:  Kurt E Roberts; Lucian Panait; Andrew J Duffy; Priya A Jamidar; Robert L Bell
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 3.  Which Fecal Immunochemical Test Should I Choose?

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Yinghui Xu; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2017-04-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.