Literature DB >> 18401063

Quantification of interplay effects of scanned particle beams and moving targets.

Christoph Bert1, Sven O Grözinger, Eike Rietzel.   

Abstract

Scanned particle beams and target motion interfere. This interplay leads to deterioration of the dose distribution. Experiments and a treatment planning study were performed to investigate interplay. Experiments were performed with moving radiographic films for different motion parameters. Resulting dose distributions were analyzed for homogeneity and dose coverage. The treatment planning study was based on the time-resolved computed tomography (4DCT) data of five lung tumor patients. Treatment plans with margins to account for respiratory motion were optimized, and resulting dose distributions for 108 different motion parameters for each patient were calculated. Data analysis for a single fraction was based on dose-volume histograms and the volume covered with 95% of the planned dose. Interplay deteriorated dose conformity and homogeneity (1-standard deviation/mean) in the experiments as well as in the treatment-planning study. The homogeneity on radiographic films was below approximately 80% for motion amplitudes of approximately 15 mm. For the treatment-planning study based on patient data, the target volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose was on average (standard deviation) 71.0% (14.2%). Interplay of scanned particle beams and moving targets has severe impact on the resulting dose distributions. Fractionated treatment delivery potentially mitigates at least parts of these interplay effects. However, especially for small fraction numbers, e.g. hypo-fractionation, treatment of moving targets with scanned particle beams requires motion mitigation techniques such as rescanning, gating, or tracking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18401063     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/9/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  55 in total

1.  [Translational uroradio-oncology].

Authors:  S E Combs; J Debus
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Strategies for preoperative downsizing in patients with local nonresectable pancreatic cancer].

Authors:  S E Combs; D Habermehl; J Werner; M W Büchler; J Debus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Motion mitigation for lung cancer patients treated with active scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Clemens Grassberger; Stephen Dowdell; Greg Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Four-dimensional layer-stacking carbon-ion beam dose distribution by use of a lung numeric phantom.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Motoki Kumagai; Kentaro Miki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 5.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Current status and future prospects of multi-dimensional image-guided particle therapy.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Silvan Zenklusen; Antje-Christin Knopf
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-02-19

7.  On the interplay effects with proton scanning beams in stage III lung cancer.

Authors:  Yupeng Li; Laleh Kardar; Xiaoqiang Li; Heng Li; Wenhua Cao; Joe Y Chang; Li Liao; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael Gillin; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; James D Cox; Gino Lim; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Reducing Dose Uncertainty for Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy of Moving Tumors by Optimizing the Spot Delivery Sequence.

Authors:  Heng Li; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Four-dimensional Monte Carlo simulations demonstrating how the extent of intensity-modulation impacts motion effects in proton therapy lung treatments.

Authors:  Stephen Dowdell; Clemens Grassberger; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chenbin Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Shawn Korte; Jiajian Shen; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Yixiu Kang; Sameer R Keole; Terence T Sio; William W Wong; Narayan Sahoo; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.