Literature DB >> 18400951

Binding cooperativity in phage lambda is not sufficient to produce an effective switch.

Tomás Gedeon1, Konstantin Mischaikow, Kathryn Patterson, Eliane Traldi.   

Abstract

In the wild-type phage lambda, binding of CI to O(R)2 helps polymerase bound to P(RM) transition from a closed to open complex. Activators on other promoters increase the polymerase-DNA binding energy, or affect both the binding energy and the closed-open transition probability. Using a validated mathematical model, we show that these two modes of upregulation have very different effects on the promoter function. We predict that if CI(2) bound to O(R)2 produced equal increase in RNAP-DNA binding constant (compared to wild-type increase in the closed-open transition probability), the lysogen would be significantly less stable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18400951      PMCID: PMC2292370          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.121756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  23 in total

1.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T S Gardner; C R Cantor; J J Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Robustness of a gene regulatory circuit.

Authors:  J W Little; D P Shepley; D W Wert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-08-02       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Why the lysogenic state of phage lambda is so stable: a mathematical modeling approach.

Authors:  Moisés Santillán; Michael C Mackey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Sequence tolerance of the phage lambda PRM promoter: implications for evolution of gene regulatory circuitry.

Authors:  Christine B Michalowski; Megan D Short; John W Little
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models.

Authors:  Lacramioara Bintu; Nicolas E Buchler; Hernan G Garcia; Ulrich Gerland; Terence Hwa; Jané Kondev; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 6.  Activation and repression of transcription by differential contact: two sides of a coin.

Authors:  S Roy; S Garges; S Adhya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Changing the mechanism of transcriptional activation by phage lambda repressor.

Authors:  M Li; W R McClure; M M Susskind
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mutant lambda phage repressor with a specific defect in its positive control function.

Authors:  L Guarente; J S Nye; A Hochschild; M Ptashne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the lambda PRM promoter.

Authors:  D K Hawley; W R McClure
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Dynamic regulation of the tryptophan operon: a modeling study and comparison with experimental data.

Authors:  M Santillan; M C Mackey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predicting gene-regulation functions: lessons from temperate bacteriophages.

Authors:  Vladimir B Teif
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Cooperativity leads to temporally-correlated fluctuations in the bacteriophage lambda genetic switch.

Authors:  Jacob Q Shenker; Milo M Lin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.753

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.