| Literature DB >> 18398502 |
Kaoru Matsuo1, Hidekazu Arai, Kazusa Muto, Makiko Fukaya, Tadatoshi Sato, Akira Mizuno, Masae Sakuma, Hisami Yamanaka-Okumura, Hajime Sasaki, Hironori Yamamoto, Yutaka Taketani, Toshio Doi, Eiji Takeda.
Abstract
Abdominal obesity is a principal risk factor in the development of metabolic syndrome. Previously, we showed that a palatinose-based liquid formula, Inslow/MHN-01, suppressed postprandial plasma glucose level and reduced visceral fat accumulation better than the standard formula (SF). To elucidate the mechanism of Inslow-mediated anti-obesity effect, expression levels of genes involved in the glucose and lipid metabolism were compared in Inslow- and SF-fed rats. Both fasting plasma insulin level and average islet sizes were reduced in the Inslow group. We also found less abdominal fat accumulation and reduced hepatic triacylglycerol content in the Inslow group. Expression of the beta-oxidation enzymes and uncoupling potein-2 (UCP-2) mRNAs in the liver of the Inslow group were higher than the SF group, which was due to a concomitant higher expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha mRNA in the former. Furthermore, expression of the UCP-2 and adiponectin mRNAs in the epididymal fat were higher in the Inslow group than the SF group, and were stimulated by a concomitant increase of the PPAR-gamma gene expression in the former. These results strongly suggested that the anti-obesity effect of Inslow was due to an increase in the hepatic PPAR-alpha and adipocyte PPAR-gamma gene expressions.Entities:
Keywords: PPAR-α; PPAR-γ; fat oxidation; insulin-sparing effect; palatinose
Year: 2007 PMID: 18398502 PMCID: PMC2275770 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.40.234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Composition of experimental diets
| SF | Inslow | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy balance | ||
| Protein (%) | 16.0 | 20.0 |
| Fat (%) | 25.0 | 29.7 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 59.0 | 50.3 |
| Fatty acid composition include | ||
| Palmitic acid (%) | 6.0 | 5.8 |
| Stearic acid (%) | 3.0 | 3.7 |
| Oleic acid (%) | 45.0 | 68.5 |
| Linoleic acid (%) | 32.0 | 12.6 |
| α-linolenic acid (%) | 8.0 | 4.2 |
| Other fatty acid (%) | 6.0 | 5.2 |
| Carbohydrate composition include | ||
| Palatinose (%) | 55.7 | |
| Branched dextrin (%) | 23.9 | |
| Xylitol (%) | 5.3 | |
| Dextrin (%) | 97.2 | |
| Sucrose (%) | 2.8 | |
| Other carbohydrate (%) | 15.1 |
SF: standard formula
Primers sets for real-time PCR analysis
| GenBank accession no. | Forward 5' → 3' | Reverse 5' → 3' | Product length (bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPAR-α | M88529 | tgtatgaagccatcttcacg | ggcattgaacttcatagcga | 163 |
| PPAR-γ | AF156665 | tcaaaccctttaccacggtt | caggctctactttgatcgca | 147 |
| SREBP1c | AF286470 | ggagccatggattgcacattt | tccttcgaaggtctctcctc | 190 |
| CPT-1 | NM-031559 | ggtgggccacaaattacgtg | cagcatctccatggcgtagt | 104 |
| DCI | NM-017306 | tccgaggtgtcatcctcact | tgcacagccttccagtactc | 115 |
| ACO | J02752 | atggcagtccggagaataccc | cctcataacgctggcttcgagt | 114 |
| FAS | M76767 | tgggcccagcttcttagcc | ggaacagcgcagtaccgtaga | 104 |
| Acrp30 | NM-144744 | ggaaacttgtgcaaggttgga | ggtcacccttaggaccaaga | 140 |
| TNF-α | NM-012675 | atggatctcaaagacaacca | tcctggtatgaaatggcaaa | 143 |
| UCP-2 | NM-019354 | tctcccaatgttgcccgaaa | gggaggtcgtctgtcatgag | 107 |
| GK | J04218 | gtgaggcacgaagacctaga | ctgtgtcgttcaccattgcc | 160 |
| L-PK | L37333 | ctgccttctggatatcgact | gagtcgtgcaatgttcatcc | 133 |
| G6Pase | M11709 | cctccaagtgaattacgaag | cagtctcttgaatgtggaac | 116 |
| PEPCK | AH007109 | agacaaatccgaacgccatt | catcctgtggtctccactct | 162 |
| β-actin | NM-031144 | gtcccagtatgcctctggtcgtac | ccacgctcggtcaggatcttcatg | 171 |
PPAR, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor; SREBP1c, sterol response element binding protein 1c; CPT-1, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1; DCI, 3-2 trans enoyl-coA isomerase; ACO, acyl-CoA oxidase; FAS, fatty acid synthase; Acrp30, adiponectin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; UCP-2, uncoupling protein-2; GK, glucokinase; L-PK, liver-type pyruvate kinase; G6Pase, glucose 6-phosphatase; PEPCK, phosphoenolpyrvate carboxykinase.
Effects of SF and Inslow diets on food intake, body weight gain and plasma parameter levels in SD rats
| SF | Inslow | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Food intake (kcal/day) | 73.4 ± 2.6 | 72.6 ± 4.5 | |
| Body weight gain (g/8wks) | 79.8 ± 15.0 | 33.7 ± 10.0 | * |
| Glucose (mmol/l) | 4.54 ± 0.63 | 4.23 ± 0.41 | |
| Insulin (pmol/l) | 1171.00 ± 81.33 | 755.33 ± 41.67 | ** |
| Free fatty acid (mEq/l) | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.58 ± 0.06 | |
| Total-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.98 ± 0.13 | 2.20 ± 0.14 | |
| Triacylglycerol (mmol/l) | 1.23 ± 0.13 | 0.57 ± 0.05 | ** |
SF:standard formula. Data are presented as mean ± SE. *: p<0.05, vs SF, **: p<0.01, vs SF.
Fig. 1Effects of SF and Inslow diets on pancreas. A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the pancreas. Original magnification, ×200. Scale bars indicate 100 µm. B) Mean islet size. Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 5). *p<0.05 vs SF.
Fig. 2Effects of SF and Inslow on lipid metabolism in liver. A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the liver. Original magnification, ×200. Scale bars indicate 100 µm. B) Hepatic triacylglycerol content. C) Hepatic gene expression. The gene expression level was expressed relative to the SF group (=100%) after normalization using the β-actin gene expression level. Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 5). *p<0.05, **p<0.01 vs SF.
Fig. 3Effects of SF and Inslow diets on adiposity in white adipose tissue (WAT). A) Weight of mesenteric, epididymal, retroperitoneal and total abdominal fat. B) Histological analysis (top), and cell size distribution (bottom) of mesenteric WAT. Bar indicates 100 µm. C) Adipose gene expression. The gene expression level was expressed relative to the SF group (=100%) after normalization using the β-actin gene expression level. Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 5). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, #p<0.001, ##p<0.0001 vs SF.