| Literature DB >> 18398494 |
Soumyakanti Adhikari1, Kavirayani Indira Priyadarsini, Tulsi Mukherjee.
Abstract
Understanding of the efficacy and mechanism for the reaction of the biologically important radicals with natural and/or synthetic antioxidants is the first step towards the development of future therapeutic agents. The kinetic parameters e.g., formation and decay rate constants predict the efficacy of an antioxidant and its fate after reaction. These parameters also dictate the ease with which competing reactions would occur in a bio-environment. The spectroscopic parameters provide the clue to the site of free radical attack to these antioxidants. Here, in this article an attempt has been made to show the use of physico-chemical methods in the evaluation of antioxidant activity of some important medicinal plants commonly used in India and the subcontinent. The systems chosen here for discussions are herbal extracts as such, curcumin from turmeric, methoxy phenols from Indian spices, dehydrogingerdione from ginger and bakuchiol from Psoralea corylifolia. All the examples shown in this article illustrate the potential of the pulse radiolysis coupled with kinetic spectroscopy and other physicochemical techniques for the study of antioxidants either in the form of mixture as in herbal extract or as an isolated compound.Entities:
Keywords: bakuchiol; curcumin; dehydrogingerdione; free radical; herbal extract
Year: 2007 PMID: 18398494 PMCID: PMC2275762 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.40.174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Fig. 1Block diagram of pulse radiolysis setup
DPPH and ABTS−· radical reactions, redox potentials and antioxidant activities of plant extracts
| Extract | Cyclic Voltammetric Peaks | DPPH Assay (IC50 µg/ml) | ABTS·− assay Ascorbate equ. (%) | IC50 (µg/ml) to inhibit γ-radiation induced lipid peroxidation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phyllanthus embilica, T1 | 0.25 V | 8 ± 2 | 33 ± 5 | 7 ± 3 |
| Terminalia chebula, T2 | 0.3 V | 6 ± 4 | 60 ± 5 | 11 ± 4 |
| Terminalia belerica, T3 | 0.24 V | 10 ± 2 | 35 ± 4 | 13 ± 3 |
| Triphala, T4 | 0.3 V | 7 ± 3 | 33 ± 6 | 10 ± 3 |
Rate constants for the reaction of different radicals with curcumin
| Radical | Medium | Rate constant M−1s−1 |
|---|---|---|
| N3· | 10% acetonitrile-water | 3.4 × 109 |
| N3· | Tx-100 micelles | 1.2 × 109 |
| CCl3O2 | 48% Isopropanol-water | 1.2 × 108 |
| Lipid peroxyl radical | Linoleic acid micelles | 7.3 × 105 |
| DPPH | Acetonitrile | 1.6 × 102 |
| Superoxide radical | Tx-100 Micelles | 4.6 × 104 |
| Superoxide radicals | Acetonitrile | 4.7 × 102 |
| Glutathione radical | 50% Methanol-water | 1.0 × 108 |
| Singlet oxygen | Acetonitrile | 1.3 × 106 |
Fig. 2Reaction pathway of curcumin with oxidizing radicals
Correlation between reduction potential and the IC50 value to inhibit lipid peroxidation in microsomes
| Phenol | Reduction potential at pH 7 vs NHE | IC50 (µM) to inhibit Fe+2 induced lipid peroxidation |
|---|---|---|
| Dehydrozingerone | ~1 V | 30 ± 1 |
| Bromopentenone | 0.9 V | — |
| Eugenol | 0.8 V | 11.0 ± 0.3 |
| Isoeugenol | 0.7 V | 3.0 ± 0.4 |
Fig. 3Chemical structure of ginger compounds (1–4)
Fig. 4Oxidation mechanism of dehydrogingerdione [33]
Rate constants for the reactions of bakuchiol (5), methoxybakuchiol (6) and the analog (3) with different radicals
| Radical | pH | λ (nm) | kf (M−1s−1) | kd (s−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ·OH | 10 | 360 | 3.6 × 109 | 2.3 × 103 | |
| N3· | 11 | 360 | 1.3 × 109 | 1.0 × 103 | |
| GS· | 5.4 | 300, 360 | 9.0 × 107 | 1.8 × 103 | |
| CCl3O2· | 10.9 | 350 | 2.8 × 108 | 3.0 × 103 | |
| GS· | 5.4 | 300 | 8 × 107 | 2.55 × 103 | |
| GS· | 5.4 | 300 | 1.2 × 108 | 2.6 × 103 |
kf and kd are the bimolecular rate constant for the formation of the scavengers radical and the decay constant of this radical, respectively.
Fig. 5Chemical structure of bakuchiol (5), methoxy bakuchiol (6), congeners (7, 8)