Literature DB >> 18397559

Preferred options for receiving sexual health screening results: a population and patient survey.

L Brown1, A Copas, J Stephenson, G Gilleran, J D C Ross.   

Abstract

Current genitourinary medicine patients (202) and potential future patients (542) completed a questionnaire-based survey to determine their preference for obtaining test results, their acceptability of including a named infection on contact slips and to report expectations about the acceptable length of an appointment. Overall, most respondents (78% [n = 582]) felt it unacceptable to be only contacted if their results were positive ('no news is good news'). In the clinic, a majority preferred a contact slip to be coded (68% [n = 137]), in the general public views were balanced. Significantly, more people in the general population expected an appointment to last no longer than 30 min (32% [n = 173] cf. 10% [n = 21], P < 0.001). A clear preference was expressed to receive sexually transmitted infection test results even if they are negative. Telephone and face-to-face contact were most popular with relatively few choosing mobile telephone text messaging or email as their preferred option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18397559     DOI: 10.1258/ijsa.2007.007172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  9 in total

1.  Formative Evaluation to Assess Communication Technology Access and Health Communication Preferences of Alaska Native People.

Authors:  Renee F Robinson; Denise A Dillard; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka; Julia J Smith; Steve Tierney; Jaedon P Avey; Dedra S Buchwald
Journal:  Int J Indig Health       Date:  2015

Review 2.  How effective are short message service reminders at increasing clinic attendance? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Guy; Jane Hocking; Handan Wand; Sam Stott; Hammad Ali; John Kaldor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Use of text messaging for maternal and infant health: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Elisabeth Poorman; Julie Gazmararian; Ruth M Parker; Baiyu Yang; Lisa Elon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-05

4.  Understanding patient choices for attending sexually transmitted infection testing services: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Carrie Llewellyn; Alex Pollard; Alec Miners; Daniel Richardson; Martin Fisher; John Cairns; Helen Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Assessing user preferences for sexually transmitted infection testing services: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Alec Miners; Carrie Llewellyn; Alex Pollard; Mylene Lagarde; Daniel Richardson; John Cairns; Martin Fisher; Helen Smith
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Perceptions and Experiences of Internet-Based Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research.

Authors:  Tommer Spence; Inès Kander; Julia Walsh; Frances Griffiths; Jonathan Ross
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Mixed-methods evaluation of a novel online STI results service.

Authors:  Jo Gibbs; Catherine R H Aicken; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Voula Gkatzidou; Laura J Tickle; Kate Hone; S Tariq Sadiq; Pam Sonnenberg; Claudia S Estcourt
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Testing for sexually transmitted infections among students: a discrete choice experiment of service preferences.

Authors:  Carrie D Llewellyn; Chloe Sakal; Mylene Lagarde; Alex Pollard; Alec H Miners
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The eClinical Care Pathway Framework: a novel structure for creation of online complex clinical care pathways and its application in the management of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Jo Gibbs; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Voula Gkatzidou; Kate Hone; Richard E Ashcroft; Emma M Harding-Esch; Catherine M Lowndes; S Tariq Sadiq; Pam Sonnenberg; Claudia S Estcourt
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.