Literature DB >> 18396924

Tactile enhancement of auditory and visual speech perception in untrained perceivers.

Bryan Gick, Kristín M Jóhannsdóttir, Diana Gibraiel, Jeff Mühlbauer.   

Abstract

A single pool of untrained subjects was tested for interactions across two bimodal perception conditions: audio-tactile, in which subjects heard and felt speech, and visual-tactile, in which subjects saw and felt speech. Identifications of English obstruent consonants were compared in bimodal and no-tactile baseline conditions. Results indicate that tactile information enhances speech perception by about 10 percent, regardless of which other mode (auditory or visual) is active. However, within-subject analysis indicates that individual subjects who benefit more from tactile information in one cross-modal condition tend to benefit less from tactile information in the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18396924      PMCID: PMC2677308          DOI: 10.1121/1.2884349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.

Authors:  P J Blamey; R S Cowan; J I Alcantara; L A Whitford; G M Clark
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1989

3.  Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler; D J Dekle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: background and preliminary results.

Authors:  S J Norton; M C Schultz; C M Reed; L D Braida; N I Durlach; W M Rabinowitz; C Chomsky
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1977-09

5.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: effects of hand position on segmental speech perception.

Authors:  C M Reed; N I Durlach; L D Braida; M C Schultz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-12

6.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: language abilities of three deaf-blind subjects.

Authors:  C Chomsky
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-09

7.  Intermodal timing relations and audio-visual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  M McGrath; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of segmental features of speech.

Authors:  D W Sparks; P K Kuhl; A E Edmonds; G P Gray
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: discrimination ability of untrained observers.

Authors:  C M Reed; S I Rubin; L D Braida; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-12

10.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: further experiments with inexperienced observers.

Authors:  C M Reed; M J Doherty; L D Braida; N I Durlach
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1982-06
  10 in total
  15 in total

1.  The temporal window of audio-tactile integration in speech perception.

Authors:  Bryan Gick; Yoko Ikegami; Donald Derrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural correlates of audiotactile phonetic processing in early-blind readers: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Morteza Pishnamazi; Yasaman Nojaba; Habib Ganjgahi; Asie Amousoltani; Mohammad Ali Oghabian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual-tactile integration in speech perception: Evidence for modality neutral speech primitives.

Authors:  Katie Bicevskis; Donald Derrick; Bryan Gick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cross-modal effects in speech perception.

Authors:  Megan Keough; Donald Derrick; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Annu Rev Linguist       Date:  2018-08-01

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for a self-processing advantage during audiovisual speech integration.

Authors:  Avril Treille; Coriandre Vilain; Sonia Kandel; Marc Sato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Perceptual Integration of Visual Evidence of the Airstream from Aspirated Stops.

Authors:  Connor Mayer; Bryan Gick; Tamra Weigel; D H Whalen
Journal:  Can Acoust       Date:  2013-09

7.  Aero-tactile integration in speech perception.

Authors:  Bryan Gick; Donald Derrick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Aerotactile integration from distal skin stimuli.

Authors:  Donald Derrick; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.286

9.  Feel what you say: an auditory effect on somatosensory perception.

Authors:  François Champoux; Douglas M Shiller; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Somatosensory processing in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Carissa J Cascio
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.