Literature DB >> 18396063

Motor speech perception modulates the cortical language areas.

Julius Fridriksson1, Joel Moss, Ben Davis, Gordon C Baylis, Leonardo Bonilha, Chris Rorden.   

Abstract

Traditionally, the left frontal and parietal lobes have been associated with language production while regions in the temporal lobe are seen as crucial for language comprehension. However, recent evidence suggests that the classical language areas constitute an integrated network where each area plays a crucial role both in speech production and perception. We used functional MRI to examine whether observing speech motor movements (without auditory speech) relative to non-speech motor movements preferentially activates the cortical speech areas. Furthermore, we tested whether the activation in these regions was modulated by task difficulty. This dissociates between areas that are actively involved with speech perception from regions that show an obligatory activation in response to speech movements (e.g. areas that automatically activate in preparation for a motoric response). Specifically, we hypothesized that regions involved with decoding oral speech would show increasing activation with increasing difficulty. We found that speech movements preferentially activate the frontal and temporal language areas. In contrast, non-speech movements preferentially activate the parietal region. Degraded speech stimuli increased both frontal and parietal lobe activity but did not differentially excite the temporal region. These findings suggest that the frontal language area plays a role in visual speech perception and highlight the differential roles of the classical speech and language areas in processing others' motor speech movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18396063     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  22 in total

1.  The perception of visible speech: estimation of speech rate and detection of time reversals.

Authors:  Paolo Viviani; Francesca Figliozzi; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Two cortical mechanisms support the integration of visual and auditory speech: a hypothesis and preliminary data.

Authors:  Kayoko Okada; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Brain regions involved in human movement perception: a quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Grosbras; Susan Beaton; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Interaction between auditory and motor systems in speech perception.

Authors:  Zhe-Meng Wu; Ming-Li Chen; Xi-Hong Wu; Liang Li
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Acute Ischemic Lesions Associated with Impairments in Expression and Recognition of Affective Prosody.

Authors:  Amy E Wright; Cameron Davis; Yessenia Gomez; Joseph Posner; Christopher Rorden; Argye E Hillis; Donna C Tippett
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2016-07-12

Review 6.  Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Obligatory Broca's area modulation associated with passive speech perception.

Authors:  Travis H Turner; Julius Fridriksson; Julie Baker; David Eoute; Leonardo Bonilha; Christopher Rorden
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca's aphasia to produce fluent speech.

Authors:  Julius Fridriksson; H Isabel Hubbard; Sarah Grace Hudspeth; Audrey L Holland; Leonardo Bonilha; Davida Fromm; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  A little more conversation, a little less action--candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan; Frank Eisner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Audiovisual speech integration does not rely on the motor system: evidence from articulatory suppression, the McGurk effect, and fMRI.

Authors:  William Matchin; Kier Groulx; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.