Literature DB >> 18394523

Temporal prediction of touch instant during observation of human and robot grasping.

Laila Craighero1, Francesco Bonetti, Luca Massarenti, Rosario Canto, Maddalena Fabbri Destro, Luciano Fadiga.   

Abstract

The aim of the present work was to test the ability to predict the instant at which a grasping hand touches an object. Our hypothesis was that, because of the activation of the mirror-neuron system, the same predictive process necessary for action execution should be active during observation. Experimental evidence indicates, however, that not only observed actions but also observed objects automatically activate observer's motor repertoire. What happens, therefore, if the observed action is different from the one automatically evoked by the vision of the object? To answer this question we presented subjects with two different grasping actions: the one most suitable for the presented object and a less appropriate one. Subjects were required to detect the instant at which the demonstrator's hand touched the object. In a further condition, subjects were required to detect the outcome of an action performed by a robotic arm moving with constant kinematics. Results showed that while in the case of robot grasping subjects responded before the touch instant, in the case of human grasping the response followed the touch instant, but occurred much earlier than simple reaction times. This demonstrates that subjects were able to predict the outcome of the seen action. The predictive capability was specifically enhanced during observation of the "suitable" grasping. We interpret these results as an indication of the synergic contribution of both object-related (canonical) and action-related (mirror) neurons during observation of actions directed towards graspable objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18394523     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  6 in total

1.  The Relative Influence of Goal and Kinematics on Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Information Provided to the Observer.

Authors:  Sofía I Mc Cabe; Jorge Ignacio Villalta; Ghislain Saunier; Scott T Grafton; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Action observation can prime visual object recognition.

Authors:  Hannah Barbara Helbig; Jasmin Steinwender; Markus Graf; Markus Kiefer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  An object-identity probability cueing paradigm during grasping observation: the facilitating effect is present only when the observed kinematics is suitable for the cued object.

Authors:  Laila Craighero; Sonia Mele; Valentina Zorzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-29

4.  The cerebellum predicts the temporal consequences of observed motor acts.

Authors:  Laura Avanzino; Marco Bove; Elisa Pelosin; Carla Ogliastro; Giovanna Lagravinese; Davide Martino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Movement observation activates motor cortex in fibromyalgia patients: a fNIRS study.

Authors:  Eleonora Gentile; Antonio Brunetti; Katia Ricci; Vitoantonio Bevilacqua; Laila Craighero; Marina de Tommaso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Hand-foot motor priming in the presence of temporary inability to use hands.

Authors:  Laila Craighero; Valentina Zorzi
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-01-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.