| Literature DB >> 18394273 |
Paul E Verweij1, János Varga, Jos Houbraken, Antonius J M M Rijs, Frans M Verduynlunel, Nicole M A Blijlevens, Yvonne R Shea, Steven M Holland, Adilia Warris, Willem J G Melchers, Robert A Samson.
Abstract
We noted a cluster of 4 cases of infection or colonization by Emericella spp., identified by sequence-based analysis as E. quadrilineata. Sequence-based analysis of an international collection of 33 Emericella isolates identified 12 as E. nidulans, all 12 of which had previously been identified by morphologic methods as E. nidulans. For 12 isolates classified as E. quadrilineata, only 6 had been previously identified accordingly. E. nidulans was less susceptible than E. quadrilineata to amphotericin B (median MICs 2.5 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively, p<0.05); E. quadrilineata was less susceptible than E. nidulans to caspofungin (median MICs, 1.83 and 0.32 mg/L, respectively, p<0.05). These data indicate that sequence-based identification is more accurate than morphologic examination for identifying Emericella spp. and that correct species demarcation and in vitro susceptibility testing may affect patient management.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18394273 PMCID: PMC2570940 DOI: 10.3201/eid1404.071157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Neighbor-joining tree based on β-tubulin sequence data of the Emericella isolates examined. Clinical isolates are set in boldface. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values. Only values >70% are indicated. T indicates the type strain; * indicates the isolates that had been misidentified by morphologic identification as E. nidulans. Scale bar represents genetic distance calculated by the Kimura 2-parameter model ().
Figure 2Neighbor-joining tree based on calmodulin sequence data of Emericella isolates examined. Clinical isolates are set in boldface. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values. Only values >70% are indicated. T indicates the type strain; * indicates the isolates that had been misidentified by morphologic identification as E. nidulans. Scale bar represents genetic distance calculated by the Kimura 2-parameter model ().
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopic images of ascospores of some Emericella isolates. A) E. quadrilineata V43-63; B) E. rugulosa V43-77; C) E. nidulans var. echinulata 4606. Scale bars represent 5 μm.
Antifungal activities against Emericella nidulans and E. quadrilineata
| Drug | MIC, mean | Significance* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amphotericin B | 2.5 | 0.5 | p<0.05 |
| Itraconazole | 0.07 | 0.13 | NS |
| Voriconazole | 0.26 | 0.39 | p<0.05 |
| Posaconazole | 0.25 | 0.22 | p<0.05 |
| Caspofungin† | 0.32 | 1.83 | p<0.05 |
| Terbinafine | 0.01 | 0.009 | NS |
*NS, not significant. †Mean minimum effective concentration was compared.