Literature DB >> 18393996

Effect on diagnostic yield of repeated stool testing during outbreaks of Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

S B Debast1, E van Kregten, K M G Oskam, T van den Berg, R J Van den Berg, E J Kuijper.   

Abstract

The effect on diagnostic yield of testing sequential stools was assessed during two hospital epidemics of Clostridium difficile. Using a rapid immunoassay, C. difficile-associated disease was diagnosed in 237 diarrhoeal patients, of whom 204 (86%) were diagnosed from the first faeces sample and 12 (5%) were diagnosed from follow-up samples obtained within 1 week. The remaining 21 (9%) patients yielded a positive test from stools obtained >1 week after the initial negative sample. It was concluded that repeated testing of stools for C. difficile toxin is of value in controlling outbreaks of C. difficile infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18393996     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01999.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  7 in total

1.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Johan S Bakken; Karen C Carroll; Susan E Coffin; Erik R Dubberke; Kevin W Garey; Carolyn V Gould; Ciaran Kelly; Vivian Loo; Julia Shaklee Sammons; Thomas J Sandora; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Clostridium Difficile Infection from a Surgical Perspective.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Rachel Hogen; Liliana Bordeianou; Karim Alavi; Paul E Wise; Ranjan Sudan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Nonutility of repeat laboratory testing for detection of Clostridium difficile by use of PCR or enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  Elisabeth Aichinger; Cathy D Schleck; William S Harmsen; Lisa M Nyre; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evolving concepts in Clostridium difficile colitis.

Authors:  Naomi G Diggs; Christina M Surawicz
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-10

6.  Diagnostic yield of repeat sampling with immunoassay, real-time PCR, and toxigenic culture for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in an epidemic and a non-epidemic setting.

Authors:  J van Prehn; C M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls; Y H van Beurden; R van Houdt; S Vainio; C W Ang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea among patients in a tertiary care center in China.

Authors:  Yongqiang Li; Yi Huang; Yuyuan Li; Yuqiang Nie
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.