OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of obesity on the presentation and course of disease in patients with gynecological cancers. STUDY DESIGN: Records of patients with endometrial (n = 1180), cervical (n = 738), and ovarian cancer (n = 824) treated between 1986 and 2005 were reviewed. Body mass index (BMI) was analyzed in relation to tumor stage, tumor grading, and prognosis. Steroid hormone receptor status and growth fraction (MIB1; Ki-67-antigen) of tumors in relation to BMI were analyzed in subgroups with endometrial (n = 183) and advanced ovarian (n = 221) cancers. In the latter subgroup, tumor vascularization (CD31) and expression of bcl-2, c-erb-B2, fibronectin, and tumor markers (CA-125, CA15-3, CEA) were also evaluated. Statistical analyses included bivariate correlation, cross-tabulation, Kaplan-Meier-survival analyses, and multifactorial residual survival analyses. RESULTS: Obese patients with endometrial carcinoma were significantly younger (p < 0.001) and their tumors were less advanced at diagnosis (p = 0.001) and were better differentiated (p = 0.010). In the subgroups, neither steroid hormone receptor status nor MIB1-determined growth fraction correlated with BMI. For both endometrial and cervical carcinomas, a high BMI influenced overall survival favorably (p (endometrial )= 0.004 and p (cervical )= 0.026). In ovarian cancer, there was a trend toward improved survival in more obese patients (p = 0.053). Immunohistochemistry revealed that c-erb-B2 expression was slightly lower in tumors of obese patients (r = -0.142; p = 0.039), but BMI did not influence any other factor. CONCLUSIONS: Although obesity increases the incidence of cancer, a high BMI does not seem to adversely influence the prognosis in patients with the mentioned gynecological malignancies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of obesity on the presentation and course of disease in patients with gynecological cancers. STUDY DESIGN: Records of patients with endometrial (n = 1180), cervical (n = 738), and ovarian cancer (n = 824) treated between 1986 and 2005 were reviewed. Body mass index (BMI) was analyzed in relation to tumor stage, tumor grading, and prognosis. Steroid hormone receptor status and growth fraction (MIB1; Ki-67-antigen) of tumors in relation to BMI were analyzed in subgroups with endometrial (n = 183) and advanced ovarian (n = 221) cancers. In the latter subgroup, tumor vascularization (CD31) and expression of bcl-2, c-erb-B2, fibronectin, and tumor markers (CA-125, CA15-3, CEA) were also evaluated. Statistical analyses included bivariate correlation, cross-tabulation, Kaplan-Meier-survival analyses, and multifactorial residual survival analyses. RESULTS:Obesepatients with endometrial carcinoma were significantly younger (p < 0.001) and their tumors were less advanced at diagnosis (p = 0.001) and were better differentiated (p = 0.010). In the subgroups, neither steroid hormone receptor status nor MIB1-determined growth fraction correlated with BMI. For both endometrial and cervical carcinomas, a high BMI influenced overall survival favorably (p (endometrial )= 0.004 and p (cervical )= 0.026). In ovarian cancer, there was a trend toward improved survival in more obesepatients (p = 0.053). Immunohistochemistry revealed that c-erb-B2 expression was slightly lower in tumors of obesepatients (r = -0.142; p = 0.039), but BMI did not influence any other factor. CONCLUSIONS: Although obesity increases the incidence of cancer, a high BMI does not seem to adversely influence the prognosis in patients with the mentioned gynecological malignancies.
Authors: Amy S Joehlin-Price; Julie A Stephens; Jianying Zhang; Floor J Backes; David E Cohn; Adrian A Suarez Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Shannon N Westin; Zhenlin Ju; Russell R Broaddus; Camilla Krakstad; Jane Li; Navdeep Pal; Karen H Lu; Robert L Coleman; Bryan T Hennessy; Samuel J Klempner; Henrica M J Werner; Helga B Salvesen; Lewis C Cantley; Gordon B Mills; Andrea P Myers Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Amy S Joehlin-Price; Carmen M Perrino; Julie Stephens; Floor J Backes; Paul J Goodfellow; David E Cohn; Adrian A Suarez Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Hannah Arem; Yikyung Park; Colleen Pelser; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Melinda L Irwin; Albert Hollenbeck; Gretchen L Gierach; Louise A Brinton; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Charles E Matthews Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ashley S Felix; Cindy K Blair; Amy Lehman; Julie K Bower; Subha V Raman; DeAnn Lazovich; David E Cohn; Anna E Prizment Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Koji Matsuo; Michael J Gray; Dong Yun Yang; Sucheta A Srivastava; Prem B Tripathi; Laura A Sonoda; Eun-Jeong Yoo; Louis Dubeau; Amy S Lee; Yvonne G Lin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 5.482