Literature DB >> 18389935

Imaging as a Biomarker: Standards for Change Measurements in Therapy workshop summary.

Laurence P Clarke1, Ram D Sriram, Linda Beth Schilling.   

Abstract

Biomarkers are biological indicators of disease or therapeutic effects that can be measured by in vivo biomedical/molecular imaging, as well as other in vitro or laboratory methods. Recent work has shown that biomedical imaging can provide an early indication of drug response by use of x-ray, computed tomography (CT), positron-emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There are three primary sources of uncertainty in using imaging as a biomarker: 1) the biological variability, 2) the variability associated with the clinicians interpreting the images, and 3) the physical measurement variability associated with image data collection and analysis across the same or different imaging platforms. Although biological variability is a large source of error, the physical uncertainty often significantly reduces the robustness of the imaging methods and the clinical decision tools required for quantitative measurement of therapy response over time. Physical and biological measurement uncertainties may be addressed prior to designing a clinical trial and thus help in reducing the case size and cost of a clinical trial associated with a drug submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been approached over the last few years by several industry and medical stakeholders to address the physical sources of measurement uncertainty. NIST's initial research discovered that the characterization of measurement uncertainty poses many complex metrology and standardization problems on a scale that appears to need significant collaboration across the different medical imaging stakeholders. Many of the issues are similar to other scientific domains that NIST has addressed as part of its mission to provide metrology standards to enhance the competitiveness of U.S. industries. To better assess the measurement and standards needs for using imaging as a biomarker, NIST engaged leading representatives from many of the different imaging societies, the imaging, pharmaceutical and e-health and other health care stakeholders, as well as other key federal agencies (the National Institutes of Health Institutes and Centers [NIH ICs], and FDA) to organize and conduct a United States Measurement System (USMS) workshop: http://usms.nist.gov/workshops. The workshop entitled Imaging as a Biomarker: Standards for Change Measurements in Therapy, was thus held on September 14-15, 2006, at NIST in Gaithersburg, Maryland. (Workshop agenda, presentations. and final workshop report will be available at http://usms.nist.gov/workshops/bioimaging.htm.)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18389935     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  17 in total

1.  Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Mehmet Kocak; Harold Thurston; Tina Young Poussaint
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Imaging-based observational databases for clinical problem solving: the role of informatics.

Authors:  Alex A T Bui; William Hsu; Corey Arnold; Suzie El-Saden; Denise R Aberle; Ricky K Taira
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Quantitative imaging for evaluation of response to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Laurence P Clarke; Barbara S Croft; Robert Nordstrom; Huiming Zhang; Gary Kelloff; J Tatum
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 4.  The quantitative neuroradiology initiative framework: application to dementia.

Authors:  Olivia Goodkin; Hugh Pemberton; Sjoerd B Vos; Ferran Prados; Carole H Sudre; James Moggridge; M Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Sotirios Bisdas; Mark White; Tarek Yousry; John Thornton; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  An Assessment of Imaging Informatics for Precision Medicine in Cancer.

Authors:  C Chennubhotla; L P Clarke; A Fedorov; D Foran; G Harris; E Helton; R Nordstrom; F Prior; D Rubin; J H Saltz; E Shalley; A Sharma
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

6.  Special Section Guest Editorial: Quantitative Imaging and the Pioneering Efforts of Laurence P. Clarke.

Authors:  Robert J Nordstrom
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-09-13

Review 7.  Functional and molecular image guidance in radiotherapy treatment planning optimization.

Authors:  Shiva K Das; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.934

8.  Recommendations towards standards for quantitative MRI (qMRI) and outstanding needs.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Joshua R Biller; Jana G Delfino; Michael A Boss; Mark D Does; Jeffrey L Evelhoch; Mark A Griswold; Jeffrey L Gunter; R Scott Hinks; Stuart W Hoffman; Geena Kim; Riccardo Lattanzi; Xiaojuan Li; Luca Marinelli; Gregory J Metzger; Pratik Mukherjee; Robert J Nordstrom; Adele P Peskin; Elena Perez; Stephen E Russek; Berkman Sahiner; Natalie Serkova; Amita Shukla-Dave; Michael Steckner; Karl F Stupic; Lisa J Wilmes; Holden H Wu; Huiming Zhang; Edward F Jackson; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  The role of fMRI in drug development.

Authors:  Owen Carmichael; Adam J Schwarz; Christopher H Chatham; David Scott; Jessica A Turner; Jaymin Upadhyay; Alexandre Coimbra; James A Goodman; Richard Baumgartner; Brett A English; John W Apolzan; Preetham Shankapal; Keely R Hawkins
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 7.851

10.  Radiation-based quantitative bioimaging at the national institute of standards and technology.

Authors:  Lisa R Karam
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.