Literature DB >> 18388809

Patient choice cesarean delivery: ethical issues.

Robin B Kalish1, Laurrence B McCullough, Frank A Chervenak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We have recently identified three salient questions within the patient choice cesarean delivery controversy. First, is performing cesarean delivery on maternal request consistent with good professional medial practice? Second, how should physicians respond to or counsel patients who request patient choice cesarean delivery? Third, should patient choice cesarean delivery be routinely offered to all pregnant women? RECENT
FINDINGS: In a well informed patient, performing a cesarean delivery on maternal request is medically and ethically acceptable. Physicians, as patient advocates and promoters of overall health and welfare of their patients, however, should, in the absence of an accepted medical indication, recommend against medically unindicated cesarean delivery. While we believe that current evidence supports a physician's decision to accede to an informed patient's request for such a delivery, it does not follow that obstetricians should routinely offer elective cesareans to all patients.
SUMMARY: When a patient makes a request for an elective cesarean delivery, obstetricians, in their capacity as patient advocate, must help guide their patient through the labyrinth of detailed medical information toward a decision that respects both the patient's autonomy and the physician's obligation to optimize the health of both the mother and the newborn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18388809     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282f55df7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  7 in total

1.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.

Authors:  Stephanie T Romero; Carol C Coulson; Shelley L Galvin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

2.  The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.

Authors:  Toby Schonfeld
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-06

3.  Postnatal unit bassinet types when rooming-in after cesarean birth: implications for breastfeeding and infant safety.

Authors:  Kristin P Tully; Helen L Ball
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.219

4.  Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Bing-shun Wang; Li-feng Zhou; David Coulter; Hong Liang; Ye Zhong; Yu-na Guo; Li-ping Zhu; Xiao-ling Gao; Wei Yuan; Er-sheng Gao
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Yim-Wah Mak
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Preference for institutional delivery and caesarean sections in Bangladesh.

Authors:  S M Mostafa Kamal
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request among Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Dipty Shrestha; Rachana Saha; Shilpi Mahato
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 0.406

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.