Literature DB >> 1838793

Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis.

C A Marzi1, P Bisiacchi, R Nicoletti.   

Abstract

Using a meta-analytic procedure we have analysed 16 studies employing a simple unimanual reaction time (RT) paradigm and lateralized visual stimuli to provide an estimate of interhemispheric transfer time in normal right-handed subjects. We found a significant overall RT advantage of the left visual field over the right and of the right hand over the left. These asymmetries can be explained by a superiority of the right hemisphere for the detection of simple visual stimuli and by a corresponding superiority of the left hemisphere for the execution of the manual response, respectively. Alternatively, they may be interpreted as related to an asymmetry of interhemispheric transmission of visuomotor information, with transfer from the right hemisphere (side of stimulus entry) to the left (side of response generation) faster than in the reverse direction. Although a direct test of these hypotheses is still lacking, we think that the evidence available is more in keeping with the latter possibility.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1838793     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90031-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  68 in total

1.  Effects of trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP) on interhemispheric communication.

Authors:  HeeSeung Lee; Rob R Kydd; Vanessa K Lim; Ian J Kirk; Bruce R Russell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Martin Paré; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Attentional and intentional cueing in a Simon task: an EEG-based approach.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher; M Wolber
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-05-15

4.  At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic?

Authors:  C Cavina-Pratesi; E Bricolo; B Pellegrini; C A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).

Authors:  Claude M J Braun; Caroline Larocque; André Achim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual and tactile interhemispheric transfer compared with the method of Poffenberger.

Authors:  Robert Fendrich; Jeffrey J Hutsler; Michael S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Split-brain syndrome after hepatic transplantation: a tacrolimus-related vasculitis?

Authors:  Sara Montagnese; Sami Schiff; Carlo Poci; Pamela Iannizzi; Anna Biancardi; Renzo Manara; Chiara Briani; Daniela Mapelli; Giuseppe Realdi; Piero Amodio
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.584

10.  The impact of head direction on lateralized choices of target and hand.

Authors:  Numa Dancause; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.